Finally saw a Jumbo

[lapince]

I finally saw a Jumbo, in SS and in RG, never had before, just 15400, which for a moment I mistaked for a Jumbo, and to say the truth I didn't like it much, but the 15202 is something else, the proportions seem much better to me than 15400, I still prefer the dial and second hand of the 5711, but it is a stunner, hell just with a second hand I would maybe get one if ever I one day want a second SS blue dial watch, I have one in order which is a little too close to the 5711, it is clearly a stunner, what is incredible is that I saw it at the AP boutique and at chronopassion store, at 30 minutes intervals, the AP boutique doesn't have a list according to them, first come first served.

I found the proportions to be perfect, finition and movement impeccable, when seeing the 15400 it did nothing to me, also saw the RG ultra thin skeleton, with date, on full RG, wow what a watch, the RG Jumbo next to it looks really boring in fact, if ever one day I want a full RG watch I think that would be the one I would choose, a masterpiece on your wrist IMO

[Tay821]

What is the difference between the jumbo and the 15400? I had previously thought they were the same watch.

[Rachaphon]

Originally Posted by Tay821

What is the difference between the jumbo and the 15400? I had previously thought they were the same watch.

38mm vs 41mm
The 202 is way thinner too!!

[Robert993]

There is no comparison. 15202 ultra thin is the ONE!

[Abdullasaif]

Originally Posted by Tay821

What is the difference between the jumbo and the 15400? I had previously thought they were the same watch.

Different movement, case, bracelet, no seconds hand, different dial, dial color, no quick set function, better looking rotor

[martinr]

Actually the 15202 is 39mm, no second hand, no screw down crown. The Jumbo ultra thin skeleton with date in RG is my favorite Royal Oak. Around $84,000 USD, but what a watch.

[martinr]

15202

[martinr]

15400

[brettpaul]

Originally Posted by martinr

Actually the 15202 is 39mm, no second hand, no screw down crown. The Jumbo ultra thin skeleton with date in RG is my favorite Royal Oak. Around $84,000 USD, but what a watch.

100% agree on the skeleton mate!!

As for the 202 versus the 400, I tried both and prefer the 400 to the 202....the 202 feels fragile to me, even compared to my PP 5711.

I've gone for the 400 as I won't feel like I have to be overly careful with the watch...just my 2-cents.

In the end, either AP is an amazing watch!

[lapince]

In fact the Jumbo is ultra thin and IMO the proportions are much nicer, but that's just me, some prefer the 15400, they had it also in blue, and for me jumbo is best and by very far

[csquared317]

I love the Jumbo, I too think the proportions are better. However, I like the seconds hand, and the quickset date haha.

[capote]

Originally Posted by lapince

I found the proportions to be perfect, finition and movement impeccable, when seeing the 15400 it did nothing to me, also saw the RG ultra thin skeleton, with date, on full RG, wow what a watch, the RG Jumbo next to it looks really boring in fact, if ever one day I want a full RG watch I think that would be the one I would choose, a masterpiece on your wrist IMO

Are you saying the case finish is better on the 15202? Its obviously a different case than the 15400 but I have never heard anybody compare overall finish.

[Patton250]

Okay I am confused. I am new to all of this. What is the model number of the "jumbo"? Thanks.

[rebel_1]

Originally Posted by Patton250

Okay I am confused. I am new to all of this. What is the model number of the "jumbo"? Thanks.

15202ST.OO.1240ST.01 is the full model number from what I can find in the net. Typically it's just referred to as the 15202.

[Tay821]

Just to confirm...So the Jumbo = 39MM and thinner case? Ref is 15202? And the difference is there is no second hand and no quickset date? It also looks like the Jumbo has a larger AP logo and better placement on the dial IMO (more visible)

[rebel_1]

Originally Posted by Tay821

Just to confirm...So the Jumbo = 39MM and thinner case? Ref is 15202? And the difference is there is no second hand and no quickset date? It also looks like the Jumbo has a larger AP logo and better placement on the dial IMO (more visible)

As for the quick set date, you are a little off. The Jumbo has a rapid date advance. So technically not a quick set, but quicker than going around the month. As for the logo, here is a picture of my jumbo on my hairy beast wrist.

[brettpaul]

Originally Posted by Tay821

Just to confirm...So the Jumbo = 39MM and thinner case? Ref is 15202? And the difference is there is no second hand and no quickset date? It also looks like the Jumbo has a larger AP logo and better placement on the dial IMO (more visible)

Also, the 202 does not have a screw-down crown and the 400 does.

[Claymie]

Yes and don't forget the $6-7K price difference for the jumbo...Having worn both, I agree the jumbo's proportions are perfect. Thankfully, I can pull both off and really like the quick set date and second hand. So for me, I'll save the $$'s and opt for the silver 15400...that's as of right now. Ask me later this afternoon and I'll probably change my mind:)

[ec00421]

0Aesthetically, cant argue with 15202. One of the best looking watches in my book. I was seriously considering a 15202 a few years ago but the lack of second hand put me off at the end, and decided to go for a 15400, which is powered by the beautiful cal. 3120 (and i preferred the looks of the cal. 3120 over 2120)

Having said that, the fit, proportions, dial and history of 15202 still seduces me till this day

[cervantes]

The Jumbo 15202 has:
a smaller tapisserie work on the dial (and a bit more matte than the 15400),
no 3 marker where the date is,
smaller markers and hands,
different layout of the AP logo and automatic script,
slightly thinner bracelet,
no second hand
famous JLC based movement.

The purist choice. Arguably a bit more finicky than the new models but the proportions of the case and bracelet are legendary - and quite simply perfect.

[K3vin]

No seconds hand is personally a deal breaker for me, but so are the proportions of the 15400. I'd personally go for a 15300 with the smaller case and the sweet 3120!

[Mrkamir9]

Originally Posted by K3vin

No seconds hand is personally a deal breaker for me, but so are the proportions of the 15400. I'd personally go for a 15300 with the smaller case and the sweet 3120!

Yes! To be honest I've seen them all. The 15400 is just not appealing to me, proportions are all wrong (imo). The 15202 is absolutely stunning, but has a fragile feel. The no seconds hand wouldn't make it a deal breaker for me but I'd prefer one. The 15300 is to me the best of both worlds. The dial is beautiful with the oversized AP logo, date is cleaner without a marker hanging off, and it's just a durable solid example. I also prefer the whiter dial instead of silverish sheen, in certain lighting it still has that effect. I went back and forth but chose the 15300 for price and because it's a better everyday Royal Oak. Believe me, at 9.4mm thick it's definitely still ultra thin! Here's a few pics!

[ibenimages]

Originally Posted by Mrkamir9

Yes! To be honest I've seen them all. The 15400 is just not appealing to me, proportions are all wrong (imo). The 15202 is absolutely stunning, but has a fragile feel. The no seconds hand wouldn't make it a deal breaker for me but I'd prefer one. The 15300 is to me the best of both worlds. The dial is beautiful with the oversized AP logo, date is cleaner without a marker hanging off, and it's just a durable solid example

I second this. Well obviously because I also have one! (Albeit black dial). It's perfectly sized for me at 39mm.. And I think it's quite thin (well compared to my IWC and Rolex LOL)

Here some of the pics! Sorry for a crap iPhone quality :)

[Peterandwatches]

The 15400 is essentially the sports version of the 15202 Jumbo. They have different qualities (the 15400 having some modern comforts and the Jumbo recreating some vintage charm).

I think the 15400 bridges the gap between the RO and ROO line and is better value than the Jumbo. I would go for the 15400 and happily pocket the difference.

[agsstructures]

Originally Posted by Peterandwatches

The 15400 is essentially the sports version of the 15202 Jumbo. They have different qualities (the 15400 having some modern comforts and the Jumbo recreating some vintage charm).

I think the 15400 bridges the gap between the RO and ROO line and is better value than the Jumbo. I would go for the 15400 and happily pocket the difference.

Exactly, great point!

[el1125]

I own many watches and have owned many APs....my only APs left are 44 RG ROO AND the 15202 in RG! 202 is simply perfect! I also believe it may depend on your body SIZE. If you are a LARGE person, I'd go with the larger version. The smaller the person and wrist obv. go for the 202!

[AK797]

Originally Posted by el1125

I own many watches and have owned many APs....my only APs left are 44 RG ROO AND the 15202 in RG! 202 is simply perfect! I also believe it may depend on your body SIZE. If you are a LARGE person, I'd go with the larger version. The smaller the person and wrist obv. go for the 202!

Have you got a pic of both together? These two are right at the top of my list.

[el1125]

Originally Posted by AK797

Have you got a pic of both together? These two are right at the top of my list.

I don't now but will take and post for you

[Hairdude1]

Love the 15202 and my 5711, they do look great met to each other

[Billfav]

Those two watches next to each other are stunning. You are a lucky man.