|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 May 2016, 07:19 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Ken
Location: Taiwan & So Cal
Watch: 1655, 16570,116509
Posts: 15
|
Need help on this Red Sub
Hello:
I need advice on this 1680 Red Sub, it is advertised as 3.2 million case number, dated 1974. My question is if the case number fits the dial? More importantly, does the case look legit to you. I am a bit concern at the crown area... I am not sure if it has the correct [ ] shape from the archive. Any help comments is much appreciated!  [IMG][IMG]  [/IMG]http://i823.photobucket.com/albums/zz158/Anteaterneo/image9.jpeg[/IMG] 
|
|
|
|
29 May 2016, 08:17 PM
|
#2 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,735
|
Serial and dial match, MK-5.
Crown's look is due to polishing. Appears case back is for a 5512, not the best of pics.. Hopefully good seller.. |
|
|
|
|
29 May 2016, 10:23 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: PP 5320G
Posts: 1,259
|
Caseback is not for a 1680, stamped for a 5512.
|
|
|
|
|
30 May 2016, 08:37 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,139
|
The dial looks good to me, MK5, with homogeneous patina! As noticed, the case back is wrong.
Also, the bracelet is incorrect for the period, it should be the 9315 and not the 93150. I am not a specialist in serial numbers, but I have a Red Sub with papers and receipt that is a 3.7xxx serial and is a MK6 dial, so i guess your serial is correct for a MK5 dial. Here is mine 
__________________
Once you wear the crown, you can never go down. |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
