ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 June 2016, 01:23 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex GMT Masters
Posts: 238
|
Is this 1675 Super FAT insert real?
Hi, can anyone shed some light on whether this pepsi insert is real or not?
Cheers! |
3 June 2016, 02:33 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
Looks good to me
Edit, not sure, actually, the triangle at the top...
__________________
|
3 June 2016, 02:37 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
|
Looks good to me. Worn out pad, super fat font.
|
3 June 2016, 03:15 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
Semi OK with it - would want sharp macros of the 22 8 18 to be more sure ;)
Would need to compare to my files but I do have a little bit of reservation with it
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
3 June 2016, 03:40 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex GMT Masters
Posts: 238
|
thanks for all the input so far.
the reason why I am asking is that it looks a bit different to the other FAT FONT inserts I have seen. I find the 2 and 22 touching the top too much (no gap) and the 8 from the 18 normally touches the red colour and this one does not However I did managed to find a picture on the web which is pretty close to my picture Unfortunately I only have 1 pic atm. Would need more help! thx |
3 June 2016, 03:51 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
Doesn't look like any that I have seen before.
Is it a red back? Here are a couple super fat fonts for comparison.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
3 June 2016, 04:58 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SF East Bay
Posts: 585
|
An observation comparing the examples Springer posted: the red in the OP's insert ends at the "1" in "18" while in each of the other examples the red extends well past into the "8"
|
3 June 2016, 05:21 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Anirudh
Location: Limbo
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 186
|
I would pass on it. The triangle, the split of the numbers and the way its faded put me off
|
3 June 2016, 06:17 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
|
The 2's do look a little longer on the bottom curve than others. I was comparing it to mine which I happen to be wearing. Hard to do with just a loupe and one crappy pic. I just have not seen a fake like this before.
JP that first insert is a beauty. I love the fade on that. |
3 June 2016, 07:42 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
Here's my mega-fat one for comparison, also - note the small space above the top edge of the triangle at 12. There's blue between it and the edge of the bezel ring.
__________________
|
3 June 2016, 08:09 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
See the squished 8 in the bottom super fats above?
Couple more examples
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
3 June 2016, 12:08 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex GMT Masters
Posts: 238
|
thanks everyone! really appreciated :))
|
3 June 2016, 12:10 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex GMT Masters
Posts: 238
|
yes i find the 22 and 2 touched the top too much (no gap) and the 8 from the 18 should be touching the red color and it doesnt. I thought it might be an rare genuine rolex insert but i doubt it. i did however found one pic on the web that looks like this one i posted but means nothing. Anyway thanks everyone, i think i will pass on :)
|
3 June 2016, 07:28 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: SeB
Location: Germany
Watch: MaD_aT_gMt
Posts: 1,219
|
Not OK! Definitely AM IMO!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.