The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 July 2016, 12:52 AM   #1
WWC
"TRF" Member
 
WWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
First AP. 15400 black or 26470 navy. Please help me decide!

I'm pretty much set on my next purchase and I think it's come down to one of the following two. The Royal Oak 15400 black vs. ROO 26470 in navy blue with the rubber band.

The plan is to sell my sub partially help fund the AP. I'll be keeping the rest of the collection.

The biggest decision is between these two AP. Which one would you go for and most importantly why?

I find this decision very hard to make. I like both watches and feel like I can pull it off on a 6.5 inch wrist.

Comments are very much appreciated.
__________________
Royal Oak 15500ST
Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 | Luminor GMT PAM 00335
Aquanaut 5167A-001 | Nautilus 5712/1A-001
Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 | DEEPSEA 126660 | Explorer 214270 | GMT Master II BLRO 16710 | GMT Master II VTNR 126720 | Submariner LV 16610 | Sky-Dweller 326139 | Prince Oysterdate 90630
WWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 12:56 AM   #2
911Cab
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 560
Both are great watches. The ROO is more sporty and bulky and has more wrist presence. The 15400 is more of a dress watch that goes great with a suit or a formal occasion. The RO bracelet is to die for. I like both so I own one of each.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
911Cab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 01:00 AM   #3
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
Navy ROO for me but don't rule out the diver. It's a great piece.
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 01:01 AM   #4
WWC
"TRF" Member
 
WWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by 911Cab View Post
Both are great watches. The ROO is more sporty and bulky and has more wrist presence. The 15400 is more of a dress watch that goes great with a suit or a formal occasion. The RO bracelet is to die for. I like both so I own one of each.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Thanks! Could you elaborate on the AP bracelet? What do you mean by "its to die for" I've only worn only the Rolex oyster bracelets. How would you compare it to that?

I'm thinking which one would be better for me in the long run.

Anything I should be aware between these two movements?
__________________
Royal Oak 15500ST
Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 | Luminor GMT PAM 00335
Aquanaut 5167A-001 | Nautilus 5712/1A-001
Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 | DEEPSEA 126660 | Explorer 214270 | GMT Master II BLRO 16710 | GMT Master II VTNR 126720 | Submariner LV 16610 | Sky-Dweller 326139 | Prince Oysterdate 90630
WWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 01:11 AM   #5
911Cab
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by WWC View Post
Thanks! Could you elaborate on the AP bracelet? What do you mean by "its to die for" I've only worn only the Rolex oyster bracelets. How would you compare it to that?

I'm thinking which one would be better for me in the long run.

Anything I should be aware between these two movements?


The RO bracelet is 180 degree turn from the oyster. It's a scratch magnet as it has both brushed & polished surfaces. But if you don't mind the hairlines it's absolutely worth having. It's a work of art as its hand made and the light reflects off it spectacularly. Just google images of it and you'll get an idea. Both are in house movements and both have proven to be very reliable. Here's a shot of mine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
911Cab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 01:16 AM   #6
WWC
"TRF" Member
 
WWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by 911Cab View Post
The RO bracelet is 180 degree turn from the oyster. It's a scratch magnet as it has both brushed & polished surfaces. But if you don't mind the hairlines it's absolutely worth having. It's a work of art as its hand made and the light reflects off it spectacularly. Just google images of it and you'll get an idea. Both are in house movements and both have proven to be very reliable. Here's a shot of mine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Great wrist shot!

How's the comfort of the bracelet? As the links are more clustered and smaller in size do they pull hair or scratch the skin?
__________________
Royal Oak 15500ST
Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 | Luminor GMT PAM 00335
Aquanaut 5167A-001 | Nautilus 5712/1A-001
Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 | DEEPSEA 126660 | Explorer 214270 | GMT Master II BLRO 16710 | GMT Master II VTNR 126720 | Submariner LV 16610 | Sky-Dweller 326139 | Prince Oysterdate 90630
WWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 01:18 AM   #7
911Cab
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by WWC View Post
Great wrist shot!

How's the comfort of the bracelet? As the links are more clustered and smaller in size do they pull hair or scratch the skin?


Thanks ! The bracelet couldn't be more comfortable. No issues whatsoever. I definitely endorse the 15400 over the ROO. The bracelet for the win !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
911Cab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 01:42 AM   #8
WWC
"TRF" Member
 
WWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by 911Cab View Post
Thanks ! The bracelet couldn't be more comfortable. No issues whatsoever. I definitely endorse the 15400 over the ROO. The bracelet for the win !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


If I may ask. What's your wrist size? Any issues wearing the bigger size ROO vs the 15400?
__________________
Royal Oak 15500ST
Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 | Luminor GMT PAM 00335
Aquanaut 5167A-001 | Nautilus 5712/1A-001
Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 | DEEPSEA 126660 | Explorer 214270 | GMT Master II BLRO 16710 | GMT Master II VTNR 126720 | Submariner LV 16610 | Sky-Dweller 326139 | Prince Oysterdate 90630
WWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 01:48 AM   #9
911Cab
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by WWC View Post
If I may ask. What's your wrist size? Any issues wearing the bigger size ROO vs the 15400?


7". No issues with either. Here are some pics.








Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
911Cab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 01:50 AM   #10
lig
"TRF" Member
 
lig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,611
Have you tried them on yet?

At 6.5" you may have lug overhang on both of the references you mentioned.

That sub in your avatar is going to wear smaller than either of those.
lig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 01:52 AM   #11
JD521
"TRF" Member
 
JD521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
My first AP was an older black themes but found it to be just a bit too bulky, more sporty and less versatile for me. And the since this was the older style deployment buckle, not as comfortable as the new models with the pin buckle.
Now I have the 15400 as my one and only AP (for now hopefully) and I could not be happier. The most well balanced watch I've ever owned both in how it wears and how it looks. And the bracelet...head and shoulders above the oyster on my sub ceramic.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JD521 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 02:08 AM   #12
agsstructures
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
agsstructures's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,401
Black 15400, great watch and is my only AP. Good luck and congrats in advance!
agsstructures is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 04:06 AM   #13
Samui
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 611
Quote:
Originally Posted by 911Cab View Post
The RO bracelet is 180 degree turn from the oyster. It's a scratch magnet as it has both brushed & polished surfaces. But if you don't mind the hairlines it's absolutely worth having. It's a work of art as its hand made and the light reflects off it spectacularly. Just google images of it and you'll get an idea. Both are in house movements and both have proven to be very reliable. Here's a shot of mine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The RO and the ROO does not have an inhouse chronograph movement yet.
Samui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 04:09 AM   #14
911Cab
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samui View Post
The RO and the ROO does not have an inhouse chronograph movement yet.

I'm pretty sure the new 42&44's ROO's have a in house Chrono movement. I know the 41MM RO don't.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
911Cab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 04:11 AM   #15
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
I would pick the RO over the Blue ROO, but I'd take the Grey ROO over the 15400.

The 15400 will wear the same as your Sub, and Pix can't show how beautiful the RO bracelet is. though I agree, there are lots of great wrist shots of them, you just have to see and hold it to appreciate it.

Have you tried these 2 on? If possible, that's your best bet and decide form there.
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 04:11 AM   #16
Samui
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 611
Quote:
Originally Posted by 911Cab View Post
I'm pretty sure the new 42&44's ROO's have a in house Chrono movement. I know the 41MM RO don't.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Im pretty sure they dont. Would love to be proven otherwise.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Samui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 04:15 AM   #17
911Cab
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samui View Post
Im pretty sure they dont. Would love to be proven otherwise.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You are right. Still a module for the Chrono on the new 42 & 44's.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
911Cab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 04:22 AM   #18
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by 911Cab View Post
I'm pretty sure the new 42&44's ROO's have a in house Chrono movement. I know the 41MM RO don't.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The 41 RO is in house, the ROC is not.
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 05:31 AM   #19
lpolito415
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Loren
Location: Bay Area
Watch: Rolex, AP
Posts: 224
Go with the 15400. I just bought one last week and I am very happy. My first AP as well
lpolito415 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 09:54 AM   #20
Dolor Doc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 'merica
Watch: AP 15400
Posts: 151
Have you tried both on?

I find the 15400 to be great for casual wear and it dresses up nicely. Quite versatile.

Agree that the bracelet is out of this world. The dial is stunning. But nothing looks as good as when it's on your wrist.

Good luck with the decision! Honestly can't go wrong either way.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dolor Doc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 11:38 AM   #21
WWC
"TRF" Member
 
WWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
Thanks for all the responses guys.

I'm easily swayed either way but you guys bring out a good point. The size of both watches on my wrist. I've tried the 15400 but not the 26470. Too bad I forgot to take pics of it when I was at the AD the other day. Hopefully I'll be going there once again and taking pics of both of them on my wrist.

I do feel like the new ceramic sub is a watch I can handle but maybe nothing beyond that. Let's see.

As for the movement. Are both these watches in house calibers?! Or not?
__________________
Royal Oak 15500ST
Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 | Luminor GMT PAM 00335
Aquanaut 5167A-001 | Nautilus 5712/1A-001
Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 | DEEPSEA 126660 | Explorer 214270 | GMT Master II BLRO 16710 | GMT Master II VTNR 126720 | Submariner LV 16610 | Sky-Dweller 326139 | Prince Oysterdate 90630
WWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 11:57 AM   #22
daytonaTBR
"TRF" Member
 
daytonaTBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,466
navy
daytonaTBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 12:43 PM   #23
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
I prefer the 15300 or a 15202 over a 15400. In this case go Navy
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 01:56 PM   #24
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by WWC View Post
As for the movement. Are both these watches in house calibers?! Or not?
15400: in house cal 3120

ROO: 3126/3840 = 3120 + Dubois Depraz chronograph module

As such ROO is not fully in house, outsourcing its chrono module. I wouldn't let it stop you though. The chrono module and its added thickness are part of the ROO history at this point
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 08:58 PM   #25
watchlover135
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 124
41 mm roc all the way !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
watchlover135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 09:48 PM   #26
chuey38
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: UK
Watch: 15202
Posts: 184
i think it depends on the use case. i have a 15400 but only wear it to the office - so it does get plenty of wear.

for weekends when theres more chance of scratching with other activities, im thinking about getting a ROO - diver maybe, as i just know i'll scratch up the 15400 bracelet faster.
chuey38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 July 2016, 11:41 PM   #27
masyv6
2024 Pledge Member
 
masyv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: 35000ft
Posts: 3,771
I'll always pick a RO over the ROO. There is a soft spot in my heart for the ROOs though. I'd pick whichever one I thought went best with my normal daily attire.
masyv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2016, 01:16 PM   #28
kentheevil
"TRF" Member
 
kentheevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Ken Kelvins
Location: bkk
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 587
Roo first then RO !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kentheevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2016, 02:39 AM   #29
jrs146
"TRF" Member
 
jrs146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by WWC View Post
As the links are more clustered and smaller in size do they pull hair or scratch the skin?
Mine does every now and then, not really a big deal. It's an amazing bracelet. My only grip is no micro-adjustment. I have a 1.5 link, but even with that sometimes it's hard for me to get a perfect fit.
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own."
-Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter
jrs146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2016, 10:08 AM   #30
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by kentheevil View Post
Roo first then RO !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Grey for the win!!!
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.