ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Vingard · 25 July 2016, 01:02 PM

I've been offered a trade for a Tudor Submariner 7928. My knowledge of this reference is limited, and the owner is unable to provide much info. Can anyone provide me with some info on this piece based on the picture below?

harry in montreal · 25 July 2016, 01:25 PM

Unfortunately, it's not great. The insert is questionable. The dial looks like a poor redial. The hands seem too new. Do you have a profile or rear shot? It may be entirely a knockoff. I would need to see more. From what I do see, this is just a case and a movement. I need more to see if these parts are legit.

Vingard · 25 July 2016, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harry in montreal

Unfortunately, it's not great. The insert is questionable. The dial looks like a poor redial. The hands seem too new. Do you have a profile or rear shot? It may be entirely a knockoff. I would need to see more. From what I do see, this is just a case and a movement. I need more to see if these parts are legit.

Thanks for the feedback. Here are two additional pics. Not particularly good quality though.

alwayshere · 25 July 2016, 01:37 PM

fake all the way

Vingard · 25 July 2016, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alwayshere

fake all the way

How can you tell? So I know what to look out for in future.

harry in montreal · 25 July 2016, 02:01 PM

Yeah, the case back is all wrong. Study a 7928 that is for sale on this site. Look at the depth and quality of the engraving. The pic above shows poorly defined stamping. Light. Same with the dial. It's all wrong. Look at the depth printing. Blurry. Bad fonts.

I don't like to get uber specific since the fakers read these discussions. I don't want them to know how we tell. Sounds kinda depressing.

crowncollection · 25 July 2016, 02:52 PM

dial is a bad respray, band is fake, case is questionable need better pics

linesiders · 25 July 2016, 10:46 PM

As mentioned previously dial hands insert (97%) are all fake - actually first fake on the THAT insert I have seen. Case is not good and never seen a double chin caseback before

jdog111578 · 26 July 2016, 01:00 AM

Agreed with all above. Nothing good about that piece. Nothing original either.

25 July 2016, 01:02 PM	#1
Vingard "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: New York Posts: 52	Thoughts on this Tudor 7928? I've been offered a trade for a Tudor Submariner 7928. My knowledge of this reference is limited, and the owner is unable to provide much info. Can anyone provide me with some info on this piece based on the picture below?

25 July 2016, 02:52 PM	#7
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	dial is a bad respray, band is fake, case is questionable need better pics __________________ watches many

25 July 2016, 10:46 PM	#8
linesiders 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: RedSox Nation Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis Posts: 5,503	As mentioned previously dial hands insert (97%) are all fake - actually first fake on the THAT insert I have seen. Case is not good and never seen a double chin caseback before __________________ I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg!

25 July 2016, 01:25 PM	#2
harry in montreal "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Montreal Watch: The Habs pick 1st! Posts: 3,589	Unfortunately, it's not great. The insert is questionable. The dial looks like a poor redial. The hands seem too new. Do you have a profile or rear shot? It may be entirely a knockoff. I would need to see more. From what I do see, this is just a case and a movement. I need more to see if these parts are legit.

25 July 2016, 01:37 PM	#4
alwayshere "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Australia Posts: 1,562	fake all the way

25 July 2016, 02:01 PM	#6
harry in montreal "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Montreal Watch: The Habs pick 1st! Posts: 3,589	Yeah, the case back is all wrong. Study a 7928 that is for sale on this site. Look at the depth and quality of the engraving. The pic above shows poorly defined stamping. Light. Same with the dial. It's all wrong. Look at the depth printing. Blurry. Bad fonts. I don't like to get uber specific since the fakers read these discussions. I don't want them to know how we tell. Sounds kinda depressing.

26 July 2016, 01:00 AM	#9
jdog111578 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Real Name: Jason Location: Connecticut Watch: Tudor 7016, 94010 Posts: 256	Agreed with all above. Nothing good about that piece. Nothing original either.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)