GMT Master II

[tommywerdz]

Everything look good with this GMT?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Snow-Dweller]

Any particular reason you're asking?

Probably the photography, but the ceramic bezel looks odd to me.

[sachal007]

All gen

[tommywerdz]

Originally Posted by Snow-Dweller

Any particular reason you're asking?

Probably the photography, but the ceramic bezel looks odd to me.

A friend asked me, and I thought it looked good, but I wanted to verify with you guys first!

[GoingPlaces]

Originally Posted by Snow-Dweller

Any particular reason you're asking?

Probably the photography, but the ceramic bezel looks odd to me.

Bezel looks dull, maybe photography?

[antrolexsub]

All good. Easiest tell on modern GMT's is the hand stack. Fakes have the GMT hand below the hour hand when it should be above it. This isn't true for vintage models though.

[tommywerdz]

Thanks guys.

[Etschell]

Originally Posted by antrolexsub

All good. Easiest tell on modern GMT's is the hand stack. Fakes have the GMT hand below the hour hand when it should be above it. This isn't true for vintage models though.

untrue. some fakes have correct hand stack.

[antrolexsub]

Originally Posted by Etschell

untrue. some fakes have correct hand stack.

You're correct, Sorry I should have mentioned there are modified clone movements with the correct hand stack. I've only ever come across one. I believe it was a modifed clone movement bought from a notorious Chinese fake online dial maker. But these watches will also have other subtle errors not found on a genuine Rolex which the watch in question doesn't have.