ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Pmt2 · 26 September 2016, 08:22 AM

Which one of these would you choose? The 116600 or the 116613ln? Both are stunning watches. This would be my one and only Watch btw. Thanks in advance.

aekdb · 26 September 2016, 08:32 AM

116600 for me, just not a huge tt fan. Although as I said in a previous thread I want a bluesy in my collection at some point.

ap1 · 26 September 2016, 08:33 AM

TT- dial for the win (blue)

Ruud Van Driver · 26 September 2016, 08:35 AM

If it were me, I'd go 116600 because I'm not a fan of TT. The 116600 is probably more versatile with your wardrobe too.

Good luck

Hotrod297 · 26 September 2016, 08:35 AM

For showing off, 116613. Daily wearer, 116600.

warrior · 26 September 2016, 09:00 AM

SD 4k. Just a classier, more versatile every day watch. Like a better looking, more unusual black Submariner. Not a fan of two-tone--IMO, two tone is a little "old man" style. YMMV.

Watch Rob · 26 September 2016, 09:03 AM

SD4k. it's just cool.

Ritch99 · 26 September 2016, 09:31 AM

116600, absolutely.

sickened1 · 26 September 2016, 09:32 AM

SD4k.

AK797 · 26 September 2016, 09:40 AM

TT sub.

Wcdhtwn · 26 September 2016, 10:17 AM

SD4K. also not a TT fan but if you decide TT my recommendation is the black dial.

WAK4 · 26 September 2016, 10:17 AM

Sea Dweller for me, no question. Best all around watch IMO.

bradj · 26 September 2016, 10:19 AM

I made this decision last week.. :)

docmarioce · 26 September 2016, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bradj

I made this decision last week.. :)

I made my decision yesterday... although next in my list a new ceramic TT blue as yours. I had an old style bluessy (see my profile pic) and flipped it long ago. This new ceramic one is smoking hot.

mpcdude · 26 September 2016, 10:52 AM

Sd4k!!

HoosierRolexFan · 26 September 2016, 11:10 AM

Sd4k!

armybuck041 · 26 September 2016, 11:14 AM

No question, this one!

stratguy · 26 September 2016, 11:17 AM

Also not a fan of TT, so I'd go with the SD4K.

incontrol · 26 September 2016, 11:20 AM

Love the Bluesy! My choice easily.

Spartacus · 26 September 2016, 11:21 AM

Tough call. I can make an argument for both. Good luck!

Speed · 26 September 2016, 11:23 AM

SD is much more versatile.

kilyung · 26 September 2016, 11:24 AM

Tough one. I'd generally pick anything with some gold but the 116600 is great.

viper · 26 September 2016, 11:33 AM

SD4K!! It's as good as they get!

cdnwatchguy · 26 September 2016, 11:40 AM

A bit of an apple and oranges comparison between SS and rolesor.

As I am not a two tone fan and I do own an SD 4000k the choice is easy.

Duke84 · 26 September 2016, 12:42 PM

Love the 116600 and I'm not a fan of two tone watches, so SeaDweller by a mile here.

hhcave · 26 September 2016, 12:48 PM

116600 for me! Not a fan of TT personally

Brian Page · 26 September 2016, 12:50 PM

personal pref. SD is probably would be my vote

DCheeta · 26 September 2016, 01:08 PM

I chose this one.

ajas · 26 September 2016, 01:32 PM

Sd400

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

mandrick · 26 September 2016, 02:42 PM

I may be biased, I just picked this up today, but SD4K for me!. I actually had the debate in store between the BLNR and SD4K, and even though the "rarity" of the BLNR was tempting, I couldn't get past the polished links myself, which would probably be the case with the 2 tone for me. But honestly, you can't go wrong with either, go with your gut!

26 September 2016, 08:22 AM	#1
Pmt2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: USA Posts: 1,145	Pick one? SD 4000 or subc two tone ? Which one of these would you choose? The 116600 or the 116613ln? Both are stunning watches. This would be my one and only Watch btw. Thanks in advance.

26 September 2016, 08:35 AM	#4
Ruud Van Driver "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: Chopped Liver Location: S. Wales Valleys Watch: Mickey Mouse Posts: 9,926	If it were me, I'd go 116600 because I'm not a fan of TT. The 116600 is probably more versatile with your wardrobe too. Good luck __________________ 116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 *"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott* Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

26 September 2016, 08:35 AM	#5
Hotrod297 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Rod Location: USA & UAE Watch: Rolex Posts: 766	For showing off, 116613. Daily wearer, 116600. __________________ "I collect Rolex because I love'um and dig'um"

26 September 2016, 09:31 AM	#8
Ritch99 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Real Name: Mitch Location: CONUS Watch: DSSD and others Posts: 1,186	116600, absolutely. __________________ Sua Sponte!

26 September 2016, 11:14 AM	#17
armybuck041 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Fred'ton Canada Watch: Easy Come, Easy Go Posts: 304	No question, this one! __________________ Easy come, easy go....

26 September 2016, 08:32 AM	#2
aekdb "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Real Name: Jason Location: MS Watch: Rolex, Tudor Posts: 1,315	116600 for me, just not a huge tt fan. Although as I said in a previous thread I want a bluesy in my collection at some point.

26 September 2016, 08:33 AM	#3
ap1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,537	TT- dial for the win (blue)

26 September 2016, 09:00 AM	#6
warrior "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: massachusetts Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,692	SD 4k. Just a classier, more versatile every day watch. Like a better looking, more unusual black Submariner. Not a fan of two-tone--IMO, two tone is a little "old man" style. YMMV.

26 September 2016, 09:03 AM	#7
Watch Rob "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: Chicago Watch: 114200 Posts: 1,265	SD4k. it's just cool.

26 September 2016, 09:32 AM	#9
sickened1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Ed Location: SoCal Watch: ugiveiswatchuget Posts: 9,054	SD4k.

26 September 2016, 09:40 AM	#10
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	TT sub.

26 September 2016, 10:17 AM	#11
Wcdhtwn "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Houston Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2 Posts: 5,059	SD4K. also not a TT fan but if you decide TT my recommendation is the black dial.

26 September 2016, 10:17 AM	#12
WAK4 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Bill Location: NJ Watch: Always changing Posts: 4,172	Sea Dweller for me, no question. Best all around watch IMO.

26 September 2016, 10:19 AM	#13
bradj "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Austin, TX Watch: 116610LN 116613LB Posts: 359	I made this decision last week.. :)

26 September 2016, 10:52 AM	#15
mpcdude "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: South Korea Posts: 205	Sd4k!!

26 September 2016, 11:10 AM	#16
HoosierRolexFan "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Location: Indiana Posts: 48	Sd4k!

26 September 2016, 11:17 AM	#18
stratguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: USA Watch: Speedmaster Pro Posts: 670	Also not a fan of TT, so I'd go with the SD4K.

26 September 2016, 11:20 AM	#19
incontrol "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Kevin Location: Somewhere in PA Watch: All of them... Posts: 10,355	Love the Bluesy! My choice easily.

26 September 2016, 11:21 AM	#20
Spartacus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: DC Watch: Daytona Posts: 2,745	Tough call. I can make an argument for both. Good luck!

26 September 2016, 11:23 AM	#21
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	SD is much more versatile.

26 September 2016, 11:24 AM	#22
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	Tough one. I'd generally pick anything with some gold but the 116600 is great.

26 September 2016, 11:33 AM	#23
viper "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Northeast Posts: 943	SD4K!! It's as good as they get! __________________ 16610LV 16200 116600 116500

26 September 2016, 11:40 AM	#24
cdnwatchguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Alberta, Canada Posts: 921	A bit of an apple and oranges comparison between SS and rolesor. As I am not a two tone fan and I do own an SD 4000k the choice is easy. __________________ Keith

26 September 2016, 12:42 PM	#25
Duke84 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: T Location: USA Watch: 116600 Posts: 998	Love the 116600 and I'm not a fan of two tone watches, so SeaDweller by a mile here.

26 September 2016, 12:48 PM	#26
hhcave "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Real Name: HC Location: London, UK Watch: Sea-Dweller 4000 Posts: 186	116600 for me! Not a fan of TT personally Attached Images

26 September 2016, 12:50 PM	#27
Brian Page "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: USA Posts: 6,624	personal pref. SD is probably would be my vote

26 September 2016, 01:08 PM	#28
DCheeta "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Dave Location: NYC Posts: 7,181	I chose this one.

26 September 2016, 01:32 PM	#29
ajas "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Real Name: Will Location: Kuala Lumpur Watch: SubC, Pam, Speede Posts: 3,146	Sd400 Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

26 September 2016, 02:42 PM	#30
mandrick "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: BC, Canada Posts: 67	I may be biased, I just picked this up today, but SD4K for me!. I actually had the debate in store between the BLNR and SD4K, and even though the "rarity" of the BLNR was tempting, I couldn't get past the polished links myself, which would probably be the case with the 2 tone for me. But honestly, you can't go wrong with either, go with your gut!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)