ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 October 2016, 03:54 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
|
16660
looking for opinions on that's 16660.
1984 gloss dial,does 6k sound reasonable,no box or papers. Thanks. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
15 October 2016, 12:12 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Thailand
Posts: 19
|
Look nice piece with fair price .
Have one like this with almost same price . |
15 October 2016, 02:31 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
|
Quote:
Serial number is 842xxxx,should this be a matte dial. On the DRSD website it says Matt dials up to 8.5 million or thereabouts. Is 842 too early for a gloss dial does anybody know Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
16 October 2016, 12:18 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
|
Not too early of a serial for gloss dial. That was right in the period where Rolex was transitioning out from the matte tritium no metal surrounds dials.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090 Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M |
16 October 2016, 03:00 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Thailand
Posts: 19
|
Should be same period as yours .
FYI FYI |
17 October 2016, 01:56 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
|
Very nice piece with great tritium patina and fat case. Try to see the watch in person, because the dials from this period have a tendency to go matte or craze a little with mottling, which is often tough to see in photos. You need to see the dial cross-lit at angles. You can see a little of this type of aging around the date window in the posted photos. Of course, some guys might love that look, like patina! Good luck!
|
17 October 2016, 03:50 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
|
Quote:
It actually says in the watch description that the dial is turning Matt around the 5 and 10 past markers. Would this put buyers off if I was to try and resell in the future? I'll be seeing it tomorrow in person,not sure if I like faded dials or not,I'll know when I pick it up. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
19 October 2016, 12:53 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Asia
Watch: SD Triple 6
Posts: 56
|
I assume you're saying 6k in USD?
I have the exact same model and around the same price. Except it's a bit older put together in 1980. Its a beautiful piece and you can see the pearl is ageing nicely. Get the authentication sorted out and go for it! All the best Sent from my ASUS_Z011D using Tapatalk |
19 October 2016, 01:05 AM | #9 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
|
Quote:
|
|
19 October 2016, 04:09 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
|
Well, I saw the watch in person,it was a lot nicer in the flesh,the dial was a lot better than it looked in the photos.
Unfortunately an issue with the bracelet so I decided to pass. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
19 October 2016, 04:13 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Caleb
Location: California
Watch: Rolex 1500
Posts: 1,295
|
It looks nice!
|
20 October 2016, 07:44 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NC/USA
Posts: 295
|
What was the bracelet issue it could be an easy fix and/or a negotiating point for you
|
20 October 2016, 10:40 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.