ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 November 2016, 06:24 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 12
|
Rolex Dial
Hi. Just after some advice . I have had the watch a fee years. Inherited. The dial has what looks like a scratch. Just wondering what could have caused this to happen. Thanks in advance. P
|
4 November 2016, 06:37 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
Is it actually on the dial or on the crystal?
|
4 November 2016, 06:41 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 12
|
It's on the dial. Thanks for the reply.
|
4 November 2016, 06:48 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
|
4 November 2016, 06:58 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 12
|
No it hasn't it's always being this way. I inherited from an uncle who has passed and I never got to ask him. Just thinking of selling ,but not sure of an explanation of how the damage has occurred . Thanks again
|
4 November 2016, 07:12 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Chamblee GA
Posts: 227
|
What in the world??? Too bad that's pretty valuable dial
|
4 November 2016, 07:17 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
|
Looks like someone intentionally did that. Hard to believe a watch smith could do that and it did not happen from hand drag. Looks like they tried to draw a baseball diamond on there.
Too bad as that is a great watch/dial combo. |
4 November 2016, 07:22 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 12
|
I was told it could have been damaged by heat would anyone agree.
|
4 November 2016, 07:32 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
No idea what caused it
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
4 November 2016, 08:12 AM | #10 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
|
Quote:
that scrawl connects the 3,6,9,12 markers. Pretty unlikely that it would be anything that happened by itself. It seems to clearly be intentional (or unintentionally) by somebody at some point in time.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
4 November 2016, 08:13 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
|
4 November 2016, 08:19 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 12
|
The marks do look worse under direct light, not that easy to see at times. Looking at the pictures above I've noticed a mark under the 6 baguette . WI'll try and get better pics up tomorrow. Thanks everyone for showing a interest. Thumbs up.
|
4 November 2016, 08:21 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
Yes, it looks like the scratch continues there.
|
4 November 2016, 08:25 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
A larger pic of the dial.
|
4 November 2016, 08:43 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mr. Hsu
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Datejust
Posts: 607
|
That's just horrible. Heat did not do that.
__________________
Good things come to those who wear Rolexes. |
4 November 2016, 09:30 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Boston
Posts: 9
|
Did a diamond come loose and get dragged around the dial before being fixed?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
4 November 2016, 03:11 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: san diego
Watch: me soak up the sun
Posts: 1,245
|
I have no idea why but agree that was intentional as there's no other logical explanation, but I'd love to be proven wrong because that's just wrong
|
4 November 2016, 04:00 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 5513~1675x2~1680~
Posts: 523
|
Is that dial made of some other non-standard materials, ie. similar to the lapis dials? It's a weird pattern but it looks more like a crack than a scratch.
|
4 November 2016, 07:28 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 12
|
I agree.jban5 more of a crack
|
4 November 2016, 07:34 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 12
|
A few other pics under day light.Doesn't look so bad
|
4 November 2016, 07:49 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
|
4 November 2016, 09:25 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 12
|
Just a thought. I've been told the bezel isn't rolex original. If this is a tight fit "Going to sound dumb " but could it be stressing the dial .
|
4 November 2016, 11:29 PM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
|
4 November 2016, 11:41 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 5513~1675x2~1680~
Posts: 523
|
I think that "stress" cracks is the best descriptive of these lines. If the rehaut for some reason is pushing down on the dial with even pressure all around the outside diameter perhaps that could be the cause.
|
5 November 2016, 12:16 AM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: PRJ
Posts: 1,732
|
If we're going with the "stress crack" theory, if the dial were not fully seated into the movement or something was holding it up, and you attempted to install it, the inside of the crystal might push on the three largest, thickest diamonds and cause stress crack, literally bending the dial along those axes (would even account for the weirdness under the 6). Of course, it could never have been installed completely that way: the hands wouldn't be able to travel. Could have been a mishap while re-assembling? Do I get creative points for trying?
__________________
"Do you like Breitling?" "I don't know, really, I've never been Breitled" |
5 November 2016, 12:23 AM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,003
|
Couldn't this just be the beginning of cracking like on so-called "Spider Dials?"
|
5 November 2016, 12:33 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
This is unfortunate. I hate to say it, but I would say that that scratch could only have occurred by some deliberate action by someone who had the watch apart. Maybe scorn, extreme frustration, heartbreak or possibly substance abuse could have fueled this unfortunate defacing of the dial.
|
5 November 2016, 05:08 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 220
|
|
5 November 2016, 05:12 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
Possibly...but I still like my theory the best...
|
5 November 2016, 07:10 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 12
|
If only I had asked my uncle when he was around..
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.