The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 December 2016, 10:52 AM   #1
rushca01
"TRF" Member
 
rushca01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,754
Deep Sea Seadweller size Vs Seamastee XL

Does anyone have pics of a deep sea next to an omega planet ocean xl (45.5). Trying to decide if the deep sea is too big, I wear a planet ocean from time to time but the deep sea seems larger.
rushca01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2016, 11:19 AM   #2
Atleo
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 190
Just a small collection I keep handy for such an occasion:

https://www.google.com/search?q=deep...iw=768&bih=909


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Atleo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2016, 11:19 AM   #3
kromdom
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 530
pic found via GOOGLE (many, many more )

kromdom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2016, 02:36 PM   #4
Saoirse32
2024 Pledge Member
 
Saoirse32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by kromdom View Post
pic found via GOOGLE (many, many more )



That's not a DSSD.
OP-
I've owned both and the Omega will look bigger because of the overall face. If you're talking the 8500, about the same thickness too. The DSSD is very thick but when you look at it head on, the dial/face appears "smaller" due to the inner ring, writings on the dial etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
PANERAI Luminor 8 Days GMT “Dot” Dial (PAM00233)
PANERAI Submersible (PAM01055)
PANERAI Radiomir (PAM01385)
ROLEX Sea-Dweller Mk1 (126600)
ROLEX DeepSea D-Blue (136660)
OMEGA Speedmaster “Silver Snoopy Award” (310.32.42.50.02.001)
OMEGA Seamaster Diver 300M 75th Anniversary (210.30.42.20.03.003)
IWC Chronograph Top Gun Edition “Woodland” (IW389106)
Saoirse32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2016, 02:43 PM   #5
WJGESQ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
The PO is sweet.
WJGESQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2016, 03:32 PM   #6
WS9D
"TRF" Member
 
WS9D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,415
I have a 2016 PO 43.5 and a DSSD blue (44mm). They where very similar, and I find both very comfortable considering their large size. I will try to post a side by side later. I have just slightly under 7 inch wrists
WS9D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2016, 07:41 PM   #7
kretinou
"TRF" Member
 
kretinou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Switzerland
Watch: DSSD in a feu days
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ks6pd View Post
I will try to post a side by side later. I have just slightly under 7 inch wrists
Thank you
kretinou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 December 2016, 02:51 AM   #8
WS9D
"TRF" Member
 
WS9D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,415
Here they are together. IMHO, even thought the Omega is a 43.5mm, it wears larger than the DSSD because the dial is bigger. The DSSD ring lock makes dial smaller giving the overall watch a smaller feel. I know the OP was specifically asking about the 45.5mm, but this is the best I can do.

As I've mentioned in a few posts under the Omega groups on TRF, I think Omega crushed it this year with the 2016 PO and changing up the specs. It is a great watch. Having owned the DSSD for a month now, I like it better, but it was also twice the cost of the Omega. At 5700 USD after negotiating with AD, the new Omega holds it's ground well. I had an 8500 but sold it. All of the things I didn't like about it were fixed in 2016 by Omega. I mention all of this because I believe Omega did away with the 45.5mm PO this year and only offers it in 43.5.
Attached Images
   
WS9D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 December 2016, 05:32 AM   #9
kretinou
"TRF" Member
 
kretinou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Switzerland
Watch: DSSD in a feu days
Posts: 37
Thx for your feedback and the pics !
kretinou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 December 2016, 06:21 AM   #10
rushca01
"TRF" Member
 
rushca01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ks6pd View Post
Here they are together. IMHO, even thought the Omega is a 43.5mm, it wears larger than the DSSD because the dial is bigger. The DSSD ring lock makes dial smaller giving the overall watch a smaller feel. I know the OP was specifically asking about the 45.5mm, but this is the best I can do.

As I've mentioned in a few posts under the Omega groups on TRF, I think Omega crushed it this year with the 2016 PO and changing up the specs. It is a great watch. Having owned the DSSD for a month now, I like it better, but it was also twice the cost of the Omega. At 5700 USD after negotiating with AD, the new Omega holds it's ground well. I had an 8500 but sold it. All of the things I didn't like about it were fixed in 2016 by Omega. I mention all of this because I believe Omega did away with the 45.5mm PO this year and only offers it in 43.5.
Very nice! Thanks for taking the post. My PO is the older model with orange aluminum bezel.
rushca01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.