ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 February 2017, 11:08 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: TX
Posts: 5
|
14060 Submariner serial numbers help
I acquired a 14060 submariner with a U21 serial number. Some sources place production in 1997 and others in 1998. It has the T25 dial though i think its behaving like a luminova (still unsure).
It charges in light but only lasts a couple mins time before dimming significantly (i've heard tritium can do this too just because of the paint). It doesnt last long enough to convince me it's luminova - How long should luminova charge last? Anyway do the numbers in the serial number tell me any more details about the watch? |
9 February 2017, 12:53 PM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
U serials were first seen in late '96 and made for a few years, easily into the Luminova era.
Yours has a tritium dial so it is likely in the earlier part of the production run. It is always the "paint" that glows. Tritium is a colorless radioactive compound that excites the paint at all times and so if the tritium is active, the paint glows. The paint will still glow for a very short period when excited. If it is Luminova it will glow brightly for several hours after exposure to light.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
9 February 2017, 02:32 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: AZ
Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs
Posts: 1,974
|
If it's a T-dial that charges with light exposure, I would say that it's been re-lumed at some point.
|
10 February 2017, 01:33 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: TX
Posts: 5
|
I don't believe 'relume' is all that common is it?
I've read some of the early luminova ones still used t25 dials because they had in stock, i was thinking this is the more likely case but again i'm still not convinced what lume i have. For the serial number, i get that the letter is the generation but do the numbers have any meaning? like production number? or options code? |
10 February 2017, 02:31 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Justin S.
Location: Southeastern U.S.
Watch: 5513 Sub
Posts: 790
|
Some U series watches Marked Tritium can in fact be Luminova
I have had a couple U see GMT's & Sub's with "Swiss T<25" that are in fact Luminova from the factory, not re-lumed, so this watch is correct. Although would have to see pics to be 100% certain. But it's very likely ok.
Justin |
10 February 2017, 03:42 AM | #6 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
|
Quote:
Yes, that's true, but those are service replacement dials, and the glow from the luminova on them would be much stronger and easier to identify as such. The tritium dials from the '90s that still glow a little are pretty faint, in my experience anyway. |
|
10 February 2017, 06:52 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,125
|
My U-serial Sub has "Swiss Made" and luminova dial and hands.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
10 February 2017, 08:20 AM | #8 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
Quote:
Letter prefixes were begun after Rolex finished up with their 6 digit number combinations in ~1987, and are not meaningful in any way except for the general "dating" that enthusiasts have discovered, and even those are not 100 percent accurate.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
10 February 2017, 08:21 AM | #9 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
Quote:
Letter prefixes were begun after Rolex finished up with their 7 digit number combinations in ~1987, and are not meaningful in any way except for the general "dating" that enthusiasts have discovered, and even those are not 100 percent accurate.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
10 February 2017, 09:57 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: TX
Posts: 5
|
The funny thing to me is that if it is luminova it is the worst darn lume i've ever seen. It takes a bright light to get a decent glow and it only lasts minutes. Can anyone with confirmed luminova relate to this?
|
10 February 2017, 10:41 AM | #11 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
|
Quote:
Here's my U-serial 14060, all tritium. Luminova will have a whiter appearance than tritium, which takes on a warmth in tone as it ages. |
|
10 February 2017, 10:53 AM | #12 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
Quote:
|
|
11 February 2017, 06:43 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: AZ
Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs
Posts: 1,974
|
Quote:
He also stated that the charge time was very short. That is what made me think it may be a re-lume job (using sub-par lume material). My second guess would be that it's a standard factory Luminova service dial, as Justin surmised. Close up pics of the dial (before/after light charge) would help to clarify. |
|
11 February 2017, 07:18 PM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
|
Not a relume, just a little of the original phosphorescence remaining that the weak tritium us unable to activate but exposure to sunlight can activate for a very short time.
This is not uncommon.
__________________
E |
12 February 2017, 02:20 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: TX
Posts: 5
|
|
12 February 2017, 02:30 PM | #16 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
Or earlier supply/sale at least (from what I have gathered). Higher serial numbers tend to come with later dated papers than lower numbers in any given letter series for the same model. Same goes for transitional feature changes like dials, movements.
|
12 February 2017, 06:57 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: AZ
Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs
Posts: 1,974
|
Quote:
Some of them even had a green (Cu) tint to the lume itself. That mix seemed to be more resistant to tritium degradation as well, and many still glow quite nicely when exposed to light (photoluminescence). However, I have never seen (or been able to replicate) this effect in practice on any 80's-90's pieces. I've owned several T-dialed Subs & GMTs from that era, including a few later U & A serials. Not one would "charge" with exposure to light. Once the tritium (radiation) killed the paint's ability to phosphoresce, that was it. Nothing would make them glow, even for a second. So, it would seem that whatever paint mix Rolex was using during the 80's-90's was either very sensitive to tritium degradation, or made to be radio-luminescent but not photo-luminescent. |
|
16 February 2017, 01:35 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: TX
Posts: 5
|
Thanks for all the replies. I've tried taking pics but my only camera is an old iphone and can't get one in focus for some reason.
Guess time will tell if its tritium or luminova |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.