ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 March 2017, 01:37 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
|
New SS Sky-Dweller
I have never liked the watch but I have to admit that looking at the new version with the blue dial it looks great. It's a very useful complication but I'm not sure about the size.
How does it compare to the new Datejust 41 or the previous Datejust II (I used to own one of those in the past)
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation |
27 March 2017, 01:45 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
A bit bigger than a datejust 2 as it is 42mm.
|
27 March 2017, 01:53 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Scotland
Watch: 116333
Posts: 415
|
You have to have pretty big wrist to wear this watch. However, it looks really amazing (especially in PM). It is very nice that this watch just became more affordable for wider range of people.
|
27 March 2017, 02:40 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,392
|
It wears a bit bigger than a DJ II but not by much.
|
27 March 2017, 02:59 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
I'm also one of those wider range of people that it became more affordable for. I would rather have ~3 watches vs 1 Skydweller in PM. Will definitely be getting the new SD50 as a stablemate for my DSSD, then just have to decide on which of the SS Skydwellers to get. The blue is beautiful, just not sure I'm a "blue" wearer. |
|
27 March 2017, 03:14 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
|
I really disliked its bulbous look and dial layout. They have cleaned up the dial issue with the baton markers and changing the 24 ring so that is great. Need to try it on again and see if the size is still a turn off.
__________________
Rolex 116613LN Rolex 16610LN Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm Omega Geneve Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112 Orient Ray 2 |
27 March 2017, 06:55 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Hendricks
Location: USA
Watch: 116600
Posts: 826
|
It is a lot bigger. I tried it on many times trying to make it fit but it's big..
And it is thick. People that are interested have to try it on . The photo made it look like a DJ 41 but it is not |
27 March 2017, 09:00 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,787
|
It is bigger than the DJ II by 1 mm and the case is thicker. It has a nice wrist presence and looks amazing in my opinion. Wears a lot like my Explore II, 42 mm.
|
27 March 2017, 10:22 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
|
Its ALOT bigger than a DJ2 and alot thicker. By measurements it might be 1 or 2mm but it looks and feels alot more - I used to own both and I still do. LOL
|
27 March 2017, 11:32 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dubai
Posts: 181
|
On the list for a SS blue dial. It will compliment the Batman. Can't wait. And there will be money left over for a PM WG Cellini Dual Time. Three killer watches for the price of one.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
27 March 2017, 11:42 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ross
Location: Houston, TX
Watch: yourself
Posts: 838
|
|
28 March 2017, 12:09 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: LSU
Watch: Constantly changes
Posts: 3,815
|
|
28 March 2017, 12:19 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
It does wear pretty big but worth going to the gym for this magnificent bad boy!
|
28 March 2017, 12:21 AM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
It's not often mentioned but a SkD is significantly thicker than DD40 or DJ41
|
28 March 2017, 12:36 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 44
|
The SKD is stunning on the wrist . The white gold on a bracelet wears deceptively smaller than the yellow gold . Ive never liked Roman numerals , but the WG roman is just superb .
|
28 March 2017, 12:37 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 44
|
|
28 March 2017, 12:43 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
It wears big...the dial is the largest in the line up, see diagram below. And as Mike said, it's really got some thickness going on as well.
I'm curious to see how the steel version wears. I tried on a WG model with the black dial a few months ago and felt a noticeable difference to the BLRO I had worn into the store. |
28 March 2017, 09:11 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: China
Watch: IWC IW389001
Posts: 762
|
|
28 March 2017, 09:57 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
It's quite thick at 14.1 mm
A subc is 12.8 and a pelagos is 13.8
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
29 March 2017, 02:29 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
|
Quote:
I can't get my head around how Rolex being so conservative is jumping so late into bigger watches... just when every other brand is downsizing. I used to like big watches but now I can't go beyond 40mm and thickness is a big issue for me now, I have gotten used to relatively flat watches, only on the weekends I can wear thicker ones. Too bad, because I really liked it, maybe in the future they will apply to Datejust formula like the did to the Datejust II now 41, get the proportions right and slim it down.
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation |
|
29 March 2017, 02:34 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
|
|
29 March 2017, 02:40 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 4
|
Absolutely love the new Sky-dweller. It's a dream watch of mine that was previously out of reach due to only being in PM. Still pretty expensive at $14,400 though. I'll have to keep saving, lol.
|
29 March 2017, 02:45 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
|
|
29 March 2017, 02:53 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
Quote:
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
|
29 March 2017, 02:57 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
|
I tried on the white gold version a couple days ago to see the size. Way to big for my 6.5"~ wrist.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich |
29 March 2017, 03:01 AM | #26 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: 116500
Posts: 3,216
|
I did this as well, tried on the WG Black dial version and felt it wasn't too big for my wrist! Now the waiting begins lol (and I'm still waiting for my Daytona-C to arrive )
__________________
Rolex: 126334 (BL) | 116610LN | 116500LN (WT) | 116500LN (BK) | 126710BLRO | 116610LV | 116710BLNR |
29 March 2017, 04:41 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: England
Watch: Sub LV
Posts: 200
|
Quote:
PS - the full rose gold on bracelet BTW OMG the weight, the presence, the fluted bezel and they way it reflects light blew me away. £35,850 pounds though. Its an incredible watch and will be almost as stunning in SS. Can't wait to get mine. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.