ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Gold Crown · 2 April 2017, 02:59 AM

When it clearly has not been made for 50 years? A bit dishonest as I see it.

GB-man · 2 April 2017, 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gold Crown

When it clearly has not been made for 50 years? A bit dishonest as I see it.

How do you figure? Seadweller was released in 1967.

GradyPhilpott · 2 April 2017, 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gold Crown

When it clearly has not been made for 50 years? A bit dishonest as I see it.

I think you might be a bit too concrete in your thinking.

Gold Crown · 8 April 2017, 11:41 AM

The watch has not been produced for 50 years. Clearly its not 50 years old.

CDNWatchNut · 8 April 2017, 12:42 PM

I think its quite obvious that they're referring to the 50 years of the model's heritage...or am I missing the point here?

teo · 8 April 2017, 01:21 PM

This new sea dweller is 50yrs old so Rolex put a cyclops hope it can see better. As u know when 50yrs old watches do need glasses they r like human.

Also Watch does grow fatter when it is 50yrs old they r like human put on weight.

Maxy · 8 April 2017, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gold Crown

When it clearly has not been made for 50 years? A bit dishonest as I see it.

I don't think anyone means 50 yrs of continuous production but rather 50 yrs of its launch. Still it can be 50 years as Deepsea is still part of Sea-Dweller model for the times regular SD was not made. Do you see the same thing with 60th anniversary models of Omega's trilogy announced this year? None all of them are continuous productions and especially Railmaster!

phillycheez · 8 April 2017, 03:21 PM

Caught some fish I see..

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Canook · 8 April 2017, 03:31 PM

i agree! when car manufactures release a 50th anniversary edition of a car i dont understand why they dont build it exactly as it was 50 years ago

***note this was intended as a full sarcastic comment lol!***

2 April 2017, 02:59 AM	#1
Gold Crown Banned Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Ross Location: Chicago Area Watch: 6265 18K Daytona Posts: 928	Is It Really Correct To Call The 2017 Sea Dweller 50 Years Old? When it clearly has not been made for 50 years? A bit dishonest as I see it.

8 April 2017, 03:31 PM	#9
Canook "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Real Name: Jason Location: Aussie/Malaysia Watch: too many to list Posts: 1,470	i agree! when car manufactures release a 50th anniversary edition of a car i dont understand why they dont build it exactly as it was 50 years ago *note this was intended as a full sarcastic comment lol!* __________________ Current lineup -116610LV Sub -16233 Tapestry Datejust -16610LV KERMIT -116600 SD4000....16612 Yachtmaster- 16710 PEPSI -216570(polar)- -Yachtmaster II 116688 126300 Datejust 41 jubilee * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons *

8 April 2017, 11:41 AM	#4
Gold Crown Banned Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Ross Location: Chicago Area Watch: 6265 18K Daytona Posts: 928	The watch has not been produced for 50 years. Clearly its not 50 years old.

8 April 2017, 12:42 PM	#5
CDNWatchNut "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Juan Location: Sherwood Park, Ab Watch: 114060 Posts: 1,509	I think its quite obvious that they're referring to the 50 years of the model's heritage...or am I missing the point here?

8 April 2017, 01:21 PM	#6
teo "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: amk Posts: 792	This new sea dweller is 50yrs old so Rolex put a cyclops hope it can see better. As u know when 50yrs old watches do need glasses they r like human. Also Watch does grow fatter when it is 50yrs old they r like human put on weight.

8 April 2017, 03:21 PM	#8
phillycheez "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Portland Posts: 398	Caught some fish I see.. Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)