ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
6 April 2017, 10:48 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 5
|
116710LN for 16710 Coke??
Hi guys, I'm facing a huge dilemma right now and could really use some advise.
So today I stumbled upon someone selling a GMT Coke 16710, and I'd recently gotten the 116710LN after I had surrendered a long search for the 16710 Coke. And now I'm wondering if I should trade my 116710LN for the 16710 Coke or if I should buy it and sell mine(hoping to earn more out of it), and also wondering if it's worth doing so. Both watches have full sets and are in similar conditions. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 April 2017, 03:36 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: London
Posts: 3,318
|
I have both.
Things to bear in mind..... The newer ceramic model is a more robust piece. It will handle the day to day knocks of life a little better than the old Coke will. Don't get hung up on the 16710 bezel colour. You could buy a 16710 LN and swap the bezel insert for a Coke one for peanuts. The bracelet on the ceramic is much better quality than the old hollow link and tuna can clasp of the 16710. Having said all this, 16710 prices are still climbing and who knows where they will stop. The ceramics are still in production and depreciate from new. I love the 16710's I own, but much prefer the ceramic GMT for day to day. I treat the others as 'semi retired' now and don't give them a hard time so as to preserve their longevity as best I can, but the 16710's are still more than capable of being a daily wearer. I guess it all boils down to which one sings to you the most. |
6 April 2017, 05:52 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 1,369
|
I have made this exact same switch in the past and can understand the need for some colour but like what has been said above - just think about what you would lose if you made the switch.
The 16710 def feels nice on the wrist once you get the fitment right but after a while I think you will miss the prescence of the newer model. Plus the newer model can be worn in pretty much all situations from casual to work seemlessly. I don't think you can say that all the time about the Coke. As much as I love the classics of yesteryear - I think you should stick with what you have IMO. Unless you are thinking long term as the prices are defintely rising on the older 16710's with full set but you have to wear the watch at the end of the day and you should want to enjoy it now rather then box it away for the future. |
6 April 2017, 06:19 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Blighty (England)
Watch: Daytona/Pepsi/Sub
Posts: 1,517
|
116710LN for 16710 Coke??
I would make that trade. They are not making anymore of that model and good ones will become harder to get.
You can always get another Ceramic GMT. I swapped SubC to 16610 and made the right choice for me as I have smaller wrists and like the classic lines. The Ceramic wear big, so if this is an issue definitely make he change. |
6 April 2017, 07:48 PM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
|
Quote:
For me, I almost went with the LN as the 16710 was no longer sold new, and was concerned about finding a Coke in excellent condition. But I simply could not get past the new styling, my dislike of the polished center links, and no use for ceramic bezel upgrade. Finally, a 16710 model came along that met all my requirements. That was two years ago, and prices have only continued to rise since. My opinion, if you truly prefer the 16710, and have no need for the "upgrades" to the LN, and are able to make a good trade - yes - I would do it. |
|
6 April 2017, 08:32 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,060
|
Quote:
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
6 April 2017, 08:38 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Syd,Aust
Posts: 109
|
|
6 April 2017, 09:14 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,486
|
You were searching for a 16710 and gave up looking. Sounds like the LN was second fiddle. Get the Coke!
|
6 April 2017, 09:20 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,764
|
I would not do a trade. If you have the funds for the purchase, buy it and wear both as they are truly two different watches. If you can only have one I would keep the one you have. Modern case, dial and bracelet. I also believe the newer model is more robust in design and as such will hold up better in the long run. The older GMT hype I do not get and some of the prices are not reasonable in my opinion. For me it is just another kind of Rolex hype fueled by dealers, the internet and owners pushing prices up. Just my thoughts.
|
6 April 2017, 09:52 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 5
|
I definitely do prefer the 16710 because of the brushed links and I love the Coke bezel better.
But I do agree that the newer model is more robust and the upgrades are kinda needed as I have quite big wrists and need that bigger look the newer model offers. I've thought of possibly changing the bezel insert, but I feel like the Coke bezel with the green GMT hand wouldn't work together. I have tried on the Coke before and it did look a little small on my wrist at first but it did grow on me after a few minutes, not too sure if I was just trying to make myself feel better about it, unfortunately I did not manage to take any pictures of it at that time. I guess I'm very drawn to it because that was the model that called out to me when I first started to research and look around at luxury watches. Here's a picture of the 116710LN if it helps with any reference to the size. Haha. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
7 April 2017, 12:52 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: CO, USA
Watch: Made in Suisse
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
OP, I would do the trade if I were you. The 16710 is timeless.
__________________
Rolex 14060M · 16710 · 114270 · 16570 · 116520 · 16200 Tudor 79090 Breitling · Hamilton · IWC · Jaeger-LeCoultre · Longines · Omega · Tag Heuer · Zenith |
|
7 April 2017, 01:28 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 3,952
|
My husband wanted a daily wearer watch because he had a SS/black Sub with sentimental value, that he wanted to conserve. We found a basically unusued 16710 coke. The dealer also got a brand new Pepsi bezel from RSC, and a vintage Pepsi bezel for it. My husband wears the vintage Pepsi bezel every day. The bracelet is much more comfortable than the Sub, and because he travels the GMT function is practical.
Plus, there is the "Magnum P.I." coolness factor. (Maybe the Ferrari will arrive some day). There is nothing flimsy about the bracelet or clasp. He has worn it daily for almost two years and loves it. So, new bezels are available from the RSC, if you want new looking. If you favor the Pepsi bezel, but can find a good deal only on the Coke, the bezel can be easily swapped out. I think the best new ceramic bezel is BLNR so that would be a tough choice. |
6 April 2017, 11:36 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 618
|
do it, and then save up for a batman.
|
6 April 2017, 11:46 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
I'd definitely do it. I'm not sure I can think of a 6-digit watch that I wouldn't trade for its preceding 5-digit version.
|
7 April 2017, 12:38 AM | #15 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,999
|
Quote:
There might technically have been millions made of all the old Rolex GMTs, but trust me, the ones in great condition are getting harder and harder to find. I spent a long time looking for a good 16700. They're out there, but you need to hunt, and prices are going up and up. |
|
7 April 2017, 12:41 AM | #16 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,005
|
Quote:
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
|
8 April 2017, 03:05 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,611
|
|
7 April 2017, 12:41 AM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
16710 all day long. Since they were original to the model, RSC will sell you Pepsi and black bezel inserts if you like, plus a jubilee bracelet. Also the 116710 is just too lumey and huge number on bezel for my taste.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk |
9 April 2017, 08:25 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Australia
Watch: SS Skydweller
Posts: 659
|
[QUOTE=tomchicago;7504452]16710 all day long. Since they were original to the model, RSC will sell you Pepsi and black bezel inserts if you like, plus a jubilee bracelet. Also the 116710 is just too lumey and huge number on bezel for my taste.
I second that |
7 April 2017, 09:47 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: sydney
Posts: 226
|
Do the trade all day, every day.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk |
7 April 2017, 09:49 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Vincent B
Location: New York, NY
Watch: '06 GMT Master II
Posts: 1,261
|
I own a coke 16710 and it is my go to watch. I have pepsi and black inserts, too. The 16710 never fails.
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
__________________
Wearing Today: * Seiko SRP777 (2017) |
7 April 2017, 09:50 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,443
|
It's funny because if this was the BLNR....the decision would become 100x harder....but I agree with the 5 digit supporters...the 16710/16700 is a cooler cat than the ln. If the loss isn't great or you gain a bit....make the trade.
|
7 April 2017, 11:03 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Oddly enough, while I'd take the 5-digit over either by a long shot, I actually prefer the LN to the BLNR.
|
7 April 2017, 11:22 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,443
|
|
7 April 2017, 11:05 AM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I prefer the bezel insert on the ceramic, never did like the old numbers.
|
7 April 2017, 12:43 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
|
7 April 2017, 01:29 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Florida
Watch: LVc | SubC
Posts: 2,285
|
I would do it (not because I prefer 5 digits) because you can always go back and get a GMTc LN for a really good price (it seems you can find them for a great discount from trusted sellers.)
The 5 digit GMT is the only 5 digit I would consider (besides the Day Date) because I really like the fact that you can buy a LN and BLRO insert and swap them out whenever you feel like it |
7 April 2017, 08:50 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Syd,Aust
Posts: 109
|
So, sorry if I derail the original topic a bit. But would you go Coke z series for 7k usd or blnr for 8k usd? Sort of moving back on forth on this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
7 April 2017, 11:55 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
It's solely a matter of taste, so it's up to you. Some people think it's nuts to spend nearly the same for the old model, but I'd pick the old model all day.
|
8 April 2017, 12:22 AM | #30 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,527
|
Quote:
I would take a BLNR before a 3185 but not a 3186. Peter would agree?
__________________
E |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.