The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 June 2017, 09:40 AM   #1
Pratfall
"TRF" Member
 
Pratfall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 58
yachtmaster 40 v 37

So after years of everything but Rolex I may finally take the plunge. Specifically with the new yachtmaster with the rhodium dial. Long story short, I prefer the dimensions of the 37mm on my wrist (yes I am a guy, but I'm firmly in the "moderate looks better than big" school) though I think the cyclops eye integrates better with the 40mm.

Anyway, is there any consensus here about whether 40mm hold value better than 37mm? I realize it is impossible to know for sure. I'm not asking that. I'm simply asking whether **in general** mid size sport models are considered tougher to resell -- old explorer i's excluded, of course. Again I realize I'm asking for speculation and that's what I expect to receive. Maybe there's no difference at all. Maybe the YM is so niche nobody is familiar enough with it to know. I'm just curious.

This won't swing the decision. I'm just trying to cover my bases. Thanks all.
Pratfall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 10:48 AM   #2
ddaly12
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Cranford
Posts: 704
40mm will be more liquid.

I'd like to see wrist shots of each.
ddaly12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 10:49 AM   #3
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
40>37, value wise imo
__________________
mjclark32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 10:57 AM   #4
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
40 likely better
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 10:58 AM   #5
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
I find the 40mm to wear quite small, esp compared to the ceramic 40s, and as the guys say there is a lot more demand at that size and hence stronger resale, altho neither's is very good so you need to buy right.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 12:22 PM   #6
MCO1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Missouri USA
Watch: Daytona C white
Posts: 2,248
If I thought I would want to flip at all I would go with the 40mm. YM is niche to begin with and 37mm would be more niche.

Beautiful watch though! I had the platinum dial once, liked it except the bezel scratched something dreadful.
MCO1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 12:44 PM   #7
Pratfall
"TRF" Member
 
Pratfall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddaly12 View Post
40mm will be more liquid.

I'd like to see wrist shots of each.
Here are two lousy in-store photos from my ancient iPhone. Difference is subtle. 37 (top) is perfect to my taste while 40 (bottom) is a **touch** big, though I agree with the poster above that they wear small.

Thanks for the feedback, everyone!
Attached Images
   
Pratfall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 12:49 PM   #8
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
There's 100% consensus that the 40mm will hold value much better. That 37mm will be HARD to sell.

With that said, I think the 37mm looks good on you.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 01:12 PM   #9
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,536
You gotta play it safe here, 40 all the way.
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 02:00 PM   #10
dhmrs
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: MI
Posts: 632
The 40 doesn't even look too big on you in my opinion.
dhmrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 02:02 PM   #11
DramaTurtle
"TRF" Member
 
DramaTurtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
I am the same as you, but the simple truth is that the dimensions of the 40 look better and the watch itself holds its value far better.
__________________
16710 Pepsi | 16570 Polar | 214270 MK2 | PAM00176 | 145.022 Speedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDL View Post
Rolex moved to its furthest point of being a tool watch. The new Sea-Dweller and Meteorite GMT seem best suited for raising PGA trophies, and that might be the closest we get to one anyway.
DramaTurtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 02:02 PM   #12
nickycheong
"TRF" Member
 
nickycheong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brisbane, Austral
Watch: Rolex 116500LN
Posts: 82
The 40mm looks great on you! Another vote for the larger size from me.
nickycheong is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.