ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 June 2017, 09:40 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 58
|
yachtmaster 40 v 37
So after years of everything but Rolex I may finally take the plunge. Specifically with the new yachtmaster with the rhodium dial. Long story short, I prefer the dimensions of the 37mm on my wrist (yes I am a guy, but I'm firmly in the "moderate looks better than big" school) though I think the cyclops eye integrates better with the 40mm.
Anyway, is there any consensus here about whether 40mm hold value better than 37mm? I realize it is impossible to know for sure. I'm not asking that. I'm simply asking whether **in general** mid size sport models are considered tougher to resell -- old explorer i's excluded, of course. Again I realize I'm asking for speculation and that's what I expect to receive. Maybe there's no difference at all. Maybe the YM is so niche nobody is familiar enough with it to know. I'm just curious. This won't swing the decision. I'm just trying to cover my bases. Thanks all. |
9 June 2017, 10:48 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Cranford
Posts: 704
|
40mm will be more liquid.
I'd like to see wrist shots of each. |
9 June 2017, 10:49 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
40>37, value wise imo
__________________
|
9 June 2017, 10:57 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
|
40 likely better
|
9 June 2017, 10:58 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I find the 40mm to wear quite small, esp compared to the ceramic 40s, and as the guys say there is a lot more demand at that size and hence stronger resale, altho neither's is very good so you need to buy right.
|
9 June 2017, 12:22 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Missouri USA
Watch: Daytona C white
Posts: 2,248
|
If I thought I would want to flip at all I would go with the 40mm. YM is niche to begin with and 37mm would be more niche.
Beautiful watch though! I had the platinum dial once, liked it except the bezel scratched something dreadful. |
9 June 2017, 12:44 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 58
|
Here are two lousy in-store photos from my ancient iPhone. Difference is subtle. 37 (top) is perfect to my taste while 40 (bottom) is a **touch** big, though I agree with the poster above that they wear small.
Thanks for the feedback, everyone! |
9 June 2017, 12:49 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
There's 100% consensus that the 40mm will hold value much better. That 37mm will be HARD to sell.
With that said, I think the 37mm looks good on you. |
9 June 2017, 01:12 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,536
|
You gotta play it safe here, 40 all the way.
|
9 June 2017, 02:00 PM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: MI
Posts: 632
|
The 40 doesn't even look too big on you in my opinion.
|
9 June 2017, 02:02 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
|
I am the same as you, but the simple truth is that the dimensions of the 40 look better and the watch itself holds its value far better.
__________________
16710 Pepsi | 16570 Polar | 214270 MK2 | PAM00176 | 145.022 Speedy |
9 June 2017, 02:02 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brisbane, Austral
Watch: Rolex 116500LN
Posts: 82
|
The 40mm looks great on you! Another vote for the larger size from me.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.