|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
24 July 2017, 12:57 AM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
|
SD4000 vs Submariner comparison
For those who are interested, I just put together a comparison video of my new SD4000 vs the SubC. Let me know what you think!
https://youtu.be/wLhDdfryLi8 |
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 01:34 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: U.S.
Posts: 2,702
|
Thanks for sharing! +1 for SD4K!
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 01:43 AM
|
#3 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 02:29 AM
|
#4 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: David Cote
Location: 603/Boston 617
Watch: Watches etc
Posts: 2,322
|
 
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 02:33 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,575
|
SD4K!
Sub is classic and always will be but the proportions of SD4K, better lugs dimensions (non square), no Cyclops, and short production run make the SD4K MY choice :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 02:43 AM
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
|
Thanks guys and agreed on the SD4K. I've become more fond of 5-digit Rolex recently because of their less bulky cases. The SD4K is the perfect blend of a 5-digit diver case with the 6-digit goodies- ceramic bezel, glidelock, better movement components
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 03:52 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: David
Location: Home
Watch: Classics
Posts: 773
|
Nice video, thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 04:08 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: Pam233K
Posts: 19
|
Great video comparison. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 05:14 AM
|
#9 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Ken
Location: USA
Watch: DJ41 (126300-0007)
Posts: 445
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 05:24 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: L.J.
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 111
|
Good comparison. I enjoyed it. Thanks
__________________
All the Best, L.J. _______________________________________________ "Eternity is a long time...Especially towards the end" Woody Allen. |
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 06:55 AM
|
#11 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 07:13 AM
|
#12 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Ken
Location: USA
Watch: DJ41 (126300-0007)
Posts: 445
|
Quote:
 I guess your review had its intended affect! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 05:31 AM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
|
Well done! And yes, now I want one instead of my 116610lv
Hmmmmm, maybe both! 
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 07:42 AM
|
#14 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Durham NC
Posts: 373
|
Nice comparison. How does the SD thickness compare to the Sub? It seems quite a bit thicker. I'm not a fan of the cyclops at all but having a date function is nice.
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 07:59 AM
|
#15 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
|
Quote:
I don't have exact dimensions, but it seems to only wear a few mm higher. Definitely not nearly as high as a DSSD. I don't notice any substantial difference from the sub. |
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 07:54 AM
|
#16 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
|
Nice video !
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 08:56 PM
|
#17 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 16570
Posts: 120
|
Nice comparison thanks
 Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 10:02 PM
|
#18 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 10:39 PM
|
#19 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,064
|
Awesome! Very nicely done. This video has cemented my choice as I decide which one to get. I was on the fence and having a devil of a time deciding. Now, however, I know I'm going for the Sub with confidence in my choice.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono |
|
|
|
|
24 July 2017, 11:06 PM
|
#20 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 July 2017, 12:59 AM
|
#21 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,064
|
Quote:
That's what made it such a tough choice. Both are spectacular watches. What finally tipped the scales in favor of the Sub for me was the cyclops. Not only is it quintessentially Rolex, but it's useful for me. And I'm all about utility.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono |
|
|
|
|
|
25 July 2017, 02:59 AM
|
#22 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,895
|
Good video ;.)
|
|
|
|
|
25 July 2017, 03:37 AM
|
#23 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 454
|
Thanks, nice video!
Both are greats watches, for myself I prefer the SD. |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
