ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 August 2017, 03:02 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,139
|
HELP! Complete set VS non-complete RED SUB
Hi Guys,
Need help on a possible trade. I own this 1680 Mark VI Red Sub, just the watch no box nor papers. I`ve been offered to trade it for a Mark V with the complete set! I`ve seen the paper and all is matching. What do you guys think? Whats the premium that the complete set command? Thanks for any thoughts. This is my watch: This is the complete Set:
__________________
Once you wear the crown, you can never go down. |
12 August 2017, 03:08 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Gogland
Watch: Timex
Posts: 267
|
I prefer the even patina on the one you've already got .....
|
12 August 2017, 03:13 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,757
|
I am a huge fan of B/P but in this case why trade ? To me, vintage nitwit, your watch looks much nicer than the one in the set. A box, anchor and the booklets can be found online. New papers can be obtained via a fresh RSC service. Your watch certainly looks beautiful
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
12 August 2017, 03:47 AM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
|
I too am a fan of B&P (within reason) but mostly the box which you can easily source. Therefore just looking at the watches, yours has much more going for it (and it's a gorgeous piece btw). Better/matching patina. Dial appears to be "cleaner" (the other one has bubbling?). And your case is in overall better condition; less "sleeve polish" and sharper. Just my thoughts.
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808) |
12 August 2017, 03:59 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,139
|
Thanks for all the answers!!
__________________
Once you wear the crown, you can never go down. |
12 August 2017, 05:31 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
Case on the other one looks nicer to me but the damaged dial would be a dealbreaker.
|
12 August 2017, 05:47 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: 1665,1675,1680,SD4
Posts: 1,837
|
Most the value in the "full set" will be the warranty paper with the serial number (as everyone else mentioned all other pieces can be separately sourced). Also a premium on "punched paper" over hand written. I'm guessing your example is handwritten.
Taking that into consideration + the damaged dial, I would expect that the value between the two examples may be more closer than apart from either other. Its not worth the headache down the road trying to sell the full set with that dial on it. You're going to get haggled down with that dial...people that want full sets are going to be more discerning on condition. BTW - where is the bracelet and it's condition on the "full set?" I would pass without regret. |
12 August 2017, 06:28 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
If that outer box is a USA BUfkor, gold bottom, green top, the inner box is not correct. Additionally, the Bufkor box is not correct for that set either.
As far as trade, keep what you have. The other watch has dial issues.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
12 August 2017, 06:44 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
|
no way... the dial on the second one is not good.
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
12 August 2017, 08:42 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 72
|
Keep what you have
|
12 August 2017, 09:35 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Dallas
Watch: 1675 gilt chapter
Posts: 266
|
I've seen that watch for sale , it doesn't have punched papers. Keep what you have
|
13 August 2017, 02:10 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Europe
Watch: Anything
Posts: 2,586
|
The Dial has way too much nastiness going on pass , all them lumps and bumps
|
13 August 2017, 03:55 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
13 August 2017, 04:03 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 53
|
You don't look at your warrenty papers all day, but you do look at your Red all day.
Your Red is Beautiful. |
14 August 2017, 10:10 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 203
|
keep yours - unless you find one in same condition and 100% gurranteed that the papers and items it came with 'from birth', don't swap
|
15 August 2017, 01:12 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,640
|
No experience with vintage, but I think I'd keep what you have.
Yours look to be in much nicer condition.
__________________
WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.