The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 September 2017, 08:19 AM   #1
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
Zenith Event… (Technical Announcement)

Tomorrow, Thursday 14th September, Zenith will be revealing what they are claiming to be a “chronometric revolution”.

http://www.watchprosite.com/horologi...076.9023021/0/

http://www.watchprosite.com/zenith/h...151.9023591/0/

It’ll be interesting to see what they’ve developed, and how widespread (or not) they plan to make it within their model ranges.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2017, 04:35 PM   #2
mps354
2024 Pledge Member
 
mps354's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 9,098
Could be very interesting, thanks for sharing!
mps354 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2017, 05:44 PM   #3
edo
"TRF" Member
 
edo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sarajevo
Posts: 1,929
Can't wait to style it with neon green and pink on Bamford website

They last Defy 21 (no metter it looks a bit Hublotish) is really impressive watch...
edo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2017, 07:59 PM   #4
regnant
"TRF" Member
 
regnant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Close to Rolex AD
Posts: 3,474
I have heard of that too. Let's see what Zenith has in the store
__________________
http://s30.postimg.org/eykg4i271/A_Lange_Sohne_Movement.jpg
regnant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2017, 08:25 PM   #5
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
http://www.watchprosite.com/zenith/b...841.9019361/0/
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2017, 11:27 PM   #6
themast
"TRF" Member
 
themast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: US
Posts: 2,707
Wow, I looked at it very briefly, it seems to be a very interesting and promising development. As many things in horology, it will boil down to how much the manufacturing is up to the math.
themast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2017, 11:57 PM   #7
tamiya
"TRF" Member
 
tamiya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Willy
Location: AU, SG, MY
Posts: 1,248


Interesting innovation, wonder how shockproof it'll prove.

Metal foam case intriguing too.
tamiya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 04:26 AM   #8
Arclight
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=559885
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 07:23 PM   #9
unknown
"TRF" Member
 
unknown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
this is a gamechanger and I don't understand why it gets more attention on this forum.
ETA and Sellita are probably on Prozac right now

In 1969 Zenith introduced the El Primero and it became THE chronograph reference, they sold many movements to many brands

This will imo be similar, it might become very important
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches
unknown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 08:33 PM   #10
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
^
Probably because the majority of members have absolutely no interest in movements, bar what they have been or can be regulated to achieve.

I thought this might’ve stimulated a decent discussion, but it just proves the above statement.
C’est la vie!
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 08:43 PM   #11
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post
^
Probably because the majority of members have absolutely no interest in movements, bar what they have been or can be regulated to achieve.

I thought this might’ve stimulated a decent discussion, but it just proves the above statement.
C’est la vie!
to me, i love the movements from Zenith. Not a huge fan of the watches those movements go in. Its about movements and overall design to me and i just don't like the look. Its a shame because i would really love to own one otherwise.

But i agree most are not into movements unless we are talking the "in house" argument and then suddenly it matters and not always on the merit of the actual movement, just the label.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 08:47 PM   #12
RHJ
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
RHJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: here
Watch: 214270 Mk1
Posts: 924
I think too, that is a revolutionary step in movement history. And soon others will follow.
Great archivement for Biver and Zenith!
... just Biver behaves as Steve Jobs...
__________________
here to learn
RHJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 09:50 PM   #13
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
Other than the el primero and the daytonas with zenith movements im not a big fan of their other offerings.

Is this 30k swiss francs per watch. Geeze. I presume once in mass production it wont be that much...
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 10:21 PM   #14
unknown
"TRF" Member
 
unknown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post
^
Probably because the majority of members have absolutely no interest in movements, bar what they have been or can be regulated to achieve.

I thought this might’ve stimulated a decent discussion, but it just proves the above statement.
C’est la vie!
maybe they can take 15 minutes and this will explain quite lot




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWh0p9Irznw


impressive
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches
unknown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 10:27 PM   #15
unknown
"TRF" Member
 
unknown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etschell View Post
Other than the el primero and the daytonas with zenith movements im not a big fan of their other offerings.

Is this 30k swiss francs per watch. Geeze. I presume once in mass production it wont be that much...
the 30K is a lot but indeed for regular production it will probably be more in line with other typical Swiss watches from that segment so 6 to 12 K
The case material will also be more 'normal'.

This is not something that will compete with high end horlogery like Patek, Lange, Breguet.
But all those watches that use an ETA, UNITAS, VALJOUX or SELLITA today .. so as good a all the brands that don't go 100% in-house might be seduced to follow this path.
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches
unknown is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2017, 01:54 AM   #16
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
http://www.watchprosite.com/page-wf....l-intro-video/

Very interesting, though not a fan of Zenith designs, what is amazing is that this was invented in 1675, so Zenith didn't invent anything they just tried to put an old invention to work, I wonder if I can ask Kari to change the system on my watch to have this one before Tuesday, oh never mind, would have to wait another year
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2017, 12:36 PM   #17
themast
"TRF" Member
 
themast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: US
Posts: 2,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post
^
Probably because the majority of members have absolutely no interest in movements, bar what they have been or can be regulated to achieve.

I thought this might’ve stimulated a decent discussion, but it just proves the above statement.
C’est la vie!
I have to say, if the thread was only in this section I would not be surprised since there is not much traffic here. However, since it was linked in the general section it is interesting that it got so many hits.

In any case, if they can manufacture this system efficiently, I think they have a winner.
themast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2017, 02:21 PM   #18
watchmavan
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
It's a very impressive development. For anyone claiming otherwise get your head out of the sand. Can't say I like anything about the case. I'm also a little unimpressed with the movement thickness. I had started to think the pendulum was coming back to senseably sized chunks to metal.

Oh for a 40x12!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
watchmavan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2017, 08:22 PM   #19
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
^
The 10 pieces produced with the movement used, is more a proof of concept.
I thought the same on the thickness, but it is planned for the part to be shrunk such that it will replace existing escapements.
If/when they achieve that, then concerns about the movement thickness will be nullified.

@themast – they (will) have the ability to churn out a million of these escapements per annum, so it’s going to be interesting to see how the rest of the industry embraces the idea.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2017, 08:28 PM   #20
Hollister
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post

it’s going to be interesting to see how the rest of the industry embraces the idea.
Lead balloon, I suspect. Daniels had to hawk his coaxial escapement around various bits of Geneva until Omega adopted it, IIRC. It's the Not Invented Here syndrome.

BW,

James
Hollister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2017, 09:05 PM   #21
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
^
But George was English/British, and the industry then was buoyant. Since the recession of 2010/11, the industry has been in the doldrums, but have turned to and embraced silicon in certain areas.
With Zenith being Swiss, and Biver being who and what he is, the industry will have been paying close attention to this announcement.
Many small brands, if the accuracy can be maintained when scaled down, will be all over this so that not being COSC certified is no longer a reason for potential customers to pass them over – even though many non-COSC movements can be regulated to run better than COSC.

If there’s to be any lead ballooning, then it’ll be that the concept doesn’t match with antiquated notions (convention) of what a mechanical movement should look like – Seiko’s Spring Drive for example, not withstanding Piaget’s 118-piece Ltd Edition version of the same, at $70K!
However, if the capability and material was around 100-200 years ago, you can bet the watchmakers at that time would’ve utilised it, so I see no reason to eschew it just because it wasn’t.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2017, 09:45 PM   #22
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
I never cared if my watches were COSC or not, the most accurate one I had in all was my BLNR, but other non certified were running great.
About the industry paying attention, for sure, and Biver being great in marketing will make a big difference
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2017, 10:12 PM   #23
Arclight
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
https://youtu.be/xWh0p9Irznw
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2017, 12:34 AM   #24
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight View Post
Thanks for the video, on the one I watched and posted, either I am stupid and don't understand english, either they were saying this had been invented in 1675, and for those who know I like to party, no I hadn't had a single drink, at least here it's well explained.
So yes quite amazing, even if I think I prefer visually a balance wheel and the classical 40 plus pieces instead of one. This will surely change the industry in a huge way...

Edit: ok it's me who is stupid, I just re-read the link I posted and was probably in a hurry, or stupid, or both, as it says "abandoned" what was invented in 1675, I guess I lmissed the word "abandoned and thought it was an old invention that Zenith was using. PJ why you didn't tell me I was completely OFF?
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2017, 02:50 AM   #25
Arclight
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
I agree the silicone lacks soul. But then again I've always preferred natural to silicone.
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2017, 10:54 PM   #26
willski
"TRF" Member
 
willski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Will
Location: New York
Posts: 500
Technically amazing, but watching it "vibrate" makes me feel nauseous hah.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
willski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.