The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 September 2017, 12:00 PM   #1
WrxOwner
"TRF" Member
 
WrxOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Tustin/Alabang
Watch: 124060 116710
Posts: 42
16800, 168000 or 16610

I changed the strap on my father in law's Sub but I couldn't read the exact model
Number on it since we were at the beach. I thought I saw 16610, but he said that he got the watch sometime before any of his kids were born (so some time around 1980), and I thought 16610 started its production run in 1987(?). Just by the pics, can you guys tell if its a 16800, 168000 or even 16610??

This sub is literally daily worn since the day it was bought. Serviced only once!!






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
WrxOwner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2017, 12:05 AM   #2
sgoody1
"TRF" Member
 
sgoody1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Watch: Omega 1971 Speedm
Posts: 18
My guess is its NOT a 16610, as that would not have t<25.
It is clearly not a matte dial, so it is either a later 16800, or possibly 168000, which as far as I know are very hard to distinguish between, other than the looking between the lugs.
However, the 168000 is much rarer, with a very short run, and was late in the 80s, so that narrows it down to the gloss 16800, with service hands and bezel. IMHO.
sgoody1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2017, 12:08 AM   #3
matthewbell
"TRF" Member
 
matthewbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Singapore
Watch: 16570 + 16600
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgoody1 View Post
My guess is its NOT a 16610, as that would not have t<25.
I can't comment on the rest of your points, but this is most certainly not accurate. The 16610 had the T<25 marking up until the late 90s. Transitional models then had "Swiss" written on them, followed by the now familiar "Swiss Made" from around the turn of the century.
matthewbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2017, 12:08 AM   #4
sgoody1
"TRF" Member
 
sgoody1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Watch: Omega 1971 Speedm
Posts: 18
nb I may be wrong about 16610 not having tritium dials, but the date would still be an issue
sgoody1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2017, 02:58 AM   #5
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
I don't know, but the rubber at the 7 o'clock looks messed up
__________________
mjclark32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2017, 03:21 AM   #6
JManuel
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Mexico
Watch: 1975 Explorer II
Posts: 123
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjclark32 View Post
i don't know, but the rubber at the 7 o'clock looks messed up
+1
JManuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.