ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
17 October 2017, 12:07 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP 26400SO
Posts: 113
|
Forged Carbon vs Offshore Chronograph Diver
Given the choice between the forged carbon 44mm against the yellow Offshore Chrono Diver, which would you guys pick? Bear in mind this will be a companion to a 41mm blue dial royal oak.
I'm stuck in between as the forged carbon is a completely different material and look from the 15400. However, the yellow Offshore Chrono Diver is way sportier and is of a very unique color. Which would you choose?? Any opinions would be nice. I'm leaning more towards the forged carbon, but the limited edition of 375 is pulling its weight in my decision making. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
17 October 2017, 12:26 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 106
|
Forged Carbon vs Offshore Chronograph Diver
I’ve had the forged carbon 44. It’s very nice and very light. However if you are going for the black look, I would suggest a ceramic case. The finishing of AP Ceramic is something special. And I think it will wear better than the FC in the long run. You could find a ceramic with black dial, anthracite dial, or the new one with gold highlights.
And I would agree with going for the 44 over the Chrono Diver. |
17 October 2017, 01:01 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
of those two the FC. Not a fan of the chrono divers in any color.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition) |
17 October 2017, 04:19 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Italy
Posts: 14
|
|
17 October 2017, 01:13 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP 26400SO
Posts: 113
|
Quote:
Thanks for your input! However, I don't think I feel like stretching the budget for the Premium of the ceramic over the FC! How has the FC aged for you? Does it scratch easily? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
17 October 2017, 01:20 AM | #6 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
I only kept the FC for a couple months. To me, it felt like it would scratch easily. If not scratch, then it seemed like the edges of the case would soften up. I switched to the ceramic/anthracite dial which I really liked. The ceramic won’t scratch, the edges will stay sharp, and the finishing is so nice. I think it’s worth the premium. Others who have had the FC for longer may chime in with their input. |
|
17 October 2017, 01:36 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP 26400SO
Posts: 113
|
Quote:
|
|
17 October 2017, 02:23 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
The CE should be available for USD3-4K more than the FCs I’ve seen of late (prices for lightly used models)
|
17 October 2017, 01:14 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
Quote:
Agree with this! I’m a big fan of the CE watches I tried on the orange Diver and it really didn’t sing to me. The FC 44 is pretty cool (see below) but if it is the black dial you like, i would suggest the older version of the CE 44 with the same dial Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
17 October 2017, 01:29 AM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: England
Posts: 391
|
Quote:
|
|
17 October 2017, 02:20 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
Quote:
26400au - black dial, forged carbon |
|
17 October 2017, 02:40 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: England
Posts: 391
|
|
17 October 2017, 12:14 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP 26400SO
Posts: 113
|
Quote:
Thanks for the comparison pics! That 44 anthracite does look amazing with a suit!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
17 October 2017, 01:07 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
The FC.
The colored divers are cartoony to me to be honest although if I am still in my 20s, I will probably get the yellow one.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789 |
17 October 2017, 01:12 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP 26400SO
Posts: 113
|
|
17 October 2017, 01:20 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
Quote:
P/S: The FC44 does have the advantage of being very light and hence very comfortable for daily wearing.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789 |
|
17 October 2017, 01:36 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP 26400SO
Posts: 113
|
Haha that's exactly where the dilemma lies! I love the sporty and youthful look of the chrono diver. But I have a feeling it will be a painful loss in the wallet come the day I decide to flip it, whereas the forged carbon can be flipped easily and would be very practical for daily use!
|
17 October 2017, 01:28 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,634
|
FC is better for daily wear - the lightweight case makes it more comfortable for daily wear.
As for wear and tear - there's going to be some with FC, but in general it holds up pretty well. I've had my JT for 4 years and there are a few marks in the carbon, but it blends in with the texture of the case and is barely noticeable. Though if I was given a choice again I would take something in full CE. Maybe a good middle ground would be a preowned FC Diver? You get the lightweight case, it's 42mm and there's yellow. |
17 October 2017, 01:38 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP 26400SO
Posts: 113
|
Quote:
|
|
17 October 2017, 08:27 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 15407ST
Posts: 963
|
I would go with the 44
|
17 October 2017, 08:34 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
Between the two choices the 44 takes the diver by a country mile for me. Isn't the price quite different between them as well?
|
17 October 2017, 09:02 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,747
|
Out of those two I would go with the FC 44mm.
I second looking for an FC diver. Add a yellow strap and its super sporty. If it becomes too much then go back to the black strap. FC is plenty durable. I've had mine for 5 years and it still looks new. Also like that it has the cut/turned dial like the RO vs. the stamped dials of the ROO. The closed caseback isnt a big deal if you have other RO/ROOs where you can look at the movement on occasion. I would have a really hard time choosing between the two but with used prices being $10k apart I would lean towards the diver. These two get bay FAR the most wrist time of my APs because of the comfort and durability. |
17 October 2017, 09:22 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
Quote:
|
|
17 October 2017, 12:13 PM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP 26400SO
Posts: 113
|
Quote:
Thanks for your insight! Do you find the forged carbon very monotonous as compared to the ceramic anthracite for the 44s? The FC diver may be off the table right now as it is quite hard to source for one. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
17 October 2017, 04:27 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: John
Location: newport beach
Watch: Pateks Plural
Posts: 1,620
|
The ce is beautiful IMO.
|
17 October 2017, 11:06 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP 26400SO
Posts: 113
|
Thanks to everyone for chiming in with their opinions! The NWA has arrived. Stay tuned for pictures of what I got if you happen to care Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
18 October 2017, 05:06 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: NH
Watch: 228239, PAM00684
Posts: 2,121
|
FC out of those two for sure...I feel like novelty of the yellow would wear off over time personally.
__________________
Rolex 228239 PAM00684 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.