ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
29 October 2017, 05:56 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20
|
Confused and disappointed - RO 15400ST
Decided to get a real watch recently and felt in love with the 15400ST in black but never actually tried one until today, I think...
When I tried at the AD today, it looked so much smaller than the pictures and videos on peoples wrists I've seen all over the internet, it was very disappointing... The price tag on it was $17800 which matches the model and the sales person said it was the 41mm. Is it possible that I was shown a 37mm or 39mm instead of 41mm with that price tag? Btw my wrist is 6.75", nothing abnormal. |
29 October 2017, 09:23 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 2,027
|
With a picture we could identify if it was a 15450 instead of 15400. What is your benchmark for size of preference? Most people tend to think the 15400 is large in size.
__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other… |
29 October 2017, 09:58 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
I have not tried the 15400, but have tried the 26331 (41mm ROC, in case I’ve transposed some numbers).
I generally wear larger watches - ROO 42s and a 44 feature prominently in my rotation - and I did not find the ROC too small at all for my 7” wrist. Surprisingly, I liked it a lot, so much so that it’s moving near to the top of my “next to acquire” list. As other posters have said, it would be good to see some photos. |
29 October 2017, 10:02 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: John
Location: newport beach
Watch: Pateks Plural
Posts: 1,620
|
We always need photos here... Helps us to enable each other!
|
29 October 2017, 10:04 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,090
|
|
29 October 2017, 10:05 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
Size looked good to me, though I expect the ROC wears a bit larger than the 15400 |
30 October 2017, 12:18 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: England
Posts: 391
|
|
30 October 2017, 02:41 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
|
30 October 2017, 12:24 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,634
|
|
30 October 2017, 02:42 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
|
29 October 2017, 10:32 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 1,674
|
My wrist is 6.5" and the 15400 wears quite big - more like a 43mm. I'm guessing that you tried the 15450.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
30 October 2017, 02:25 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
|
30 October 2017, 12:25 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 2,384
|
You wouldn’t have been shown a 39mm since those have been discontinued for a few years and no one is ever going to mistake a 15202 for a 15400.
|
30 October 2017, 12:33 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: RolexHQ boardroom
Posts: 1,232
|
15400ST silver/white dial on 6.5”-6.75” wrist. Probably borderline big for me. |
30 October 2017, 02:43 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
|
30 October 2017, 05:12 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Singapore
Watch: 1665 Great White
Posts: 52
|
|
30 October 2017, 12:41 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,701
|
One hit wonder
|
30 October 2017, 12:55 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
|
It wears similar to a Rolex sub but significantly thinner.
__________________
|
30 October 2017, 01:13 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,598
|
I would guess A 41mm AP on your wrist would make you ask us if we think it's too big?
definitely Not too small
__________________
|
30 October 2017, 03:34 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
As the guys say I reckon you tried on the 15450 at 37mm, hardly ever hear the 15400 wears small unless maybe you have 8 inch wrists. The RO Chronos are also 41mm so you can check against them for the size.
|
30 October 2017, 03:53 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
ROC on my wrist. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
30 October 2017, 04:53 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
|
Wrist presence depends on your own actual wrist. The look of the watch varies not only by your wrist size but also the “nature” of your wrist I.e round, flat, etc. I’ve seen individuals with larger wrist (6.75-7.0) than me (6.3-6.5) which looks way too big simply because their wrist is round versus mine which is flat and bonier allowing the watch and lug to lug length to sit well.
|
30 October 2017, 01:34 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20
|
Thanks for all the replies and pictures guys!
Going back to the AD to try it again and make sure I have the right one. |
30 October 2017, 10:41 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
|
Look at the index next to the date...if it's reeeaaaly short (not even half as long as the other indicies), it is a 37mm 15450.
__________________
Russ |
30 October 2017, 02:45 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: WA
Watch: 5167/15400/Sub/JLC
Posts: 1,023
|
No worries. The original Jumbo was supposed to be big. The 41 captures that essence in modern times.
Just make sure the dash by the 3 marker is about twice as long as the date. That's a quick and dirty way to verify the 15400. |
30 October 2017, 09:53 PM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Real Name: Brett
Location: Florida
Watch: 5205R
Posts: 5,160
|
You must have tried on a 37mm. I have 6.5” wrists. Here are pictures of the 41mm I had and flipped because it was too big on me. The 2nd picture is a 37mm I tried on in an AP boutique. It’s too small for me. So I have settled on 39mm being the perfect size for me.
41mm 15400ST 37mm Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Morality does not derive from consensus. It only comes from one place. Pride goes before destruction, and haughtiness before a fall. Often times unbelief is disguised as wisdom Instagram - patton250 |
30 October 2017, 10:24 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Uk
Posts: 1,069
|
This too happened to me years ago
Go back and ask to see both. Then you'll know |
30 October 2017, 10:27 PM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Real Name: Brett
Location: Florida
Watch: 5205R
Posts: 5,160
|
I have been to the AP boutiques in New York City once and the one in Miami many times. It seems to me people here know 100 times more about the brand then the employees at those boutiques do.
__________________
Morality does not derive from consensus. It only comes from one place. Pride goes before destruction, and haughtiness before a fall. Often times unbelief is disguised as wisdom Instagram - patton250 |
30 October 2017, 11:12 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
|
Do they not simply have a tag hanging on the watch with reference number or something? I would think that they would probably have both references in stock, should be pretty easy to determine which is which, the 15400 being substantially larger and all...as tifosi noted, the hour marker at 3:00 next to the date is much shorter on the 450, I would just point out that if you compare pics in the link below, the one on the 15400 is actually less than half the length of the full hour markers, while on the 450 it's so short that it is about the same width of one of the bezel screws.
This article has some comparison shots: https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/ex...mm-and-15450-3
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.