The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 November 2017, 12:16 AM   #1
Fuzzball
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Argentina
Posts: 8
PAM 510 vs PAM 359

Hi guys! A newbie here!

Wich one will u choose between a new PAM 510 and a used 359

I have been reading the forum and seems like the new 510 doesn't come with the sandwich dial and the 359 is discontinued, so I can't buy it new.

Regarding the movement I won't be wearing it everyday and taking into account that it will be my first Panerai I believe I have to go with a traditional manual movement. What do you think?

Tks!

PD: I have rewrote this post because seems like the moderator is not allowing me to post values of the watches?
Fuzzball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2017, 07:19 AM   #2
Fuzzball
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Argentina
Posts: 8
Well I have been doing some research and the 510 has been discarded I want a 1950 case :-)

Lets see if now some help me to decide between a PAM01312 or PAM00359


Should I go with the newest or trust the old P9000?


Thank you!
Fuzzball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2017, 11:00 AM   #3
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
It wears top heavy. Have you tried it on?
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2017, 12:31 PM   #4
zesty55
"TRF" Member
 
zesty55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: US
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 272
1312 vs 359? I'd go 1312 because the small non-3/6/9/12 numerals look wrong to me.
zesty55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2017, 01:36 PM   #5
Fuzzball
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Argentina
Posts: 8
no I have not tried, is not a classic? what do you mean with "wears too heavy" ?
Fuzzball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2017, 01:38 PM   #6
Fuzzball
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Argentina
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by zesty55 View Post
1312 vs 359? I'd go 1312 because the small non-3/6/9/12 numerals look wrong to me.
I was wrong on the 359 it is a 312 almost the same watch but different machine and a little slim, Am I right?
Fuzzball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2017, 04:13 PM   #7
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,299
359 has the same case and movement as the 312. Differences are the fully polished case and dial style.

Depending on your wrist, it can wear thick and feel too heavy. But, for the lucky ones, it's a great fit and looks really good.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2017, 05:04 PM   #8
S2000_driver
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So Cal
Posts: 268
I strongly recommend that you try on the 44mm 1950 automatics. They have a thick case back that is quite small (area of contact with your wrist). The case itself is tall and heavy. Depending on the shape of your wrist, it can be quite unstable due to higher center of gravity. I know you are no longer looking at the 510, but those are amazing when it comes to comfort because they have a wide and thin case back. I personally found 47mm manual wind watches like 372 and 422 to be way more stable and comfortable than those 44mm 1950 automatics. My wrist is only a shade over 6.5", so that was quite the surprise.

1312 wears slightly better than the 312 because it is about 2.5mm shorter and slightly lighter.

I personally do not like that mix of large and small numerals on the 359 :)
S2000_driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2017, 08:22 PM   #9
rootbeer7
2024 Pledge Member
 
rootbeer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
having bought a PAM after many years of looking, I went with 44mm manual as the 1950 cases and auto's felt wrong. They are indeed very top-heavy unless I guess you have a large 'flat' wrist. Make sure you try them all on. As soon as a tried a manual I knew it was right. It was then just finding the dial/complications I wanted. I went base, tobacco dial and gold hands with a limited edition 390
__________________
@imrootbeer7
rootbeer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2017, 12:51 AM   #10
itsjknight
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 361
I’ve been into Panerai since 2002 and owned a lot of different models over the years. My favorite and daily wear is the 560 followed very closely by the 424.
itsjknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2017, 01:12 AM   #11
Fuzzball
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Argentina
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by S2000_driver View Post
I strongly recommend that you try on the 44mm 1950 automatics. They have a thick case back that is quite small (area of contact with your wrist). The case itself is tall and heavy. Depending on the shape of your wrist, it can be quite unstable due to higher center of gravity. I know you are no longer looking at the 510, but those are amazing when it comes to comfort because they have a wide and thin case back. I personally found 47mm manual wind watches like 372 and 422 to be way more stable and comfortable than those 44mm 1950 automatics. My wrist is only a shade over 6.5", so that was quite the surprise.

1312 wears slightly better than the 312 because it is about 2.5mm shorter and slightly lighter.

I personally do not like that mix of large and small numerals on the 359 :)
Thanks! I should try it because I have a skinny wrist :-( so skinny that I believe all PAM will feels too heavy.. so I will have to get used to it I believe
Fuzzball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2017, 10:44 AM   #12
CyclePath1
"TRF" Member
 
CyclePath1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: DFW
Watch: FPJ, SubC, PAM
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by S2000_driver View Post
I strongly recommend that you try on the 44mm 1950 automatics. They have a thick case back that is quite small (area of contact with your wrist). The case itself is tall and heavy. Depending on the shape of your wrist, it can be quite unstable due to higher center of gravity. I know you are no longer looking at the 510, but those are amazing when it comes to comfort because they have a wide and thin case back. I personally found 47mm manual wind watches like 372 and 422 to be way more stable and comfortable than those 44mm 1950 automatics. My wrist is only a shade over 6.5", so that was quite the surprise.

1312 wears slightly better than the 312 because it is about 2.5mm shorter and slightly lighter.

I personally do not like that mix of large and small numerals on the 359 :)
This...

I too have small wrists so the slightly thinner and lighter newer model 1312 was perfect for me. I recently picked one up and have no regrets. Enjoy the hunt!
CyclePath1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 November 2017, 10:23 AM   #13
cpd stick
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 78
Yeah I have a coworker that had a 312 and much prefers his new 1312
cpd stick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.