ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Jeffreyc87 · 3 April 2018, 11:56 PM

Rarely, to me, is a tt more attractive when compared to its full gold counterpart. As much as I love the tt bluesy, the full yg version is nicer looking.
But when it comes to the new rg gmt chnr...I think the TT version is nicer than the full gold version. I think it’s because the bezel gets washed out sitting up against an entire rg watch where as the tt has ss which draws your eye to the chnr bezel.

What r ur thoughts?

dmash · 3 April 2018, 11:57 PM

Never

beshannon · 3 April 2018, 11:58 PM

Never to me

justdate · 4 April 2018, 12:05 AM

Never for me. Definitely not on the RG GMT either.

soran · 4 April 2018, 12:05 AM

TT is never more attractive than full PM. And very rarely more attractive than SS.

1. PM
2. SS
3. TT

dmash · 4 April 2018, 12:06 AM

Haha don’t think these are the responses OP wanted

HorologyK · 4 April 2018, 12:08 AM

TT never.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

bluebeamer · 4 April 2018, 12:09 AM

when your bank account says so

benlee · 4 April 2018, 12:10 AM

No. Full RG is far nicer. TT always give me that "neither here nor there" feeling. Apologies to any TT owners.

Zestywesley · 4 April 2018, 12:15 AM

Might be a generational thing as TT is considered cool when I ask most people on this, and full gold is considered too gaudy/douchey. I read that TT is more popular for the younger people these days (sub 25).

samson66 · 4 April 2018, 12:16 AM

I'd put this TT ahead of a many PM's

Eiso · 4 April 2018, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffreyc87

Rarely, to me, is a tt more attractive when compared to its full gold counterpart. As much as I love the tt bluesy, the full yg version is nicer looking.
But when it comes to the new rg gmt chnr...I think the TT version is nicer than the full gold version. I think it’s because the bezel gets washed out sitting up against an entire rg watch where as the tt has ss which draws your eye to the chnr bezel.

What r ur thoughts?

First part, i have to disagree. THE FULL GOLD BLUESY 116618LB IS SO SO SO MUCH GOOD LOOKING.

Second part, totally agree. The two-tone brings out the colors so much more.

Sent from my VKY-L29 using Tapatalk

Hackdaddy66 · 4 April 2018, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samson66

I'd put this TT ahead of a many PM's

Samson66, I was just going to post my DJ 41 chocolate as the exception to that premise as well!

mation · 4 April 2018, 12:22 AM

I am kind of with OP on this one. Actually till the new gmt TT came out I was never a fan of any YG PM or TT. I found the gold colour to be to flashy for my taste. I always liked the white gold PMs, because it was not flashy.

But TT GMT is beautiful in my opinion and Id take it over any of the YG or RG models.

HL65 · 4 April 2018, 12:25 AM

I have not owned a TT since 1990 when I owned a Bluesy which I gifted to my brother who still wears it. For the first time since then I like a TT more than full gold model and yes it’s the new GMT CHNR. The watch just looks so right in TT. So we shall see but am contemplating getting one over the full RG to go with new Pepsi.

4BostonB · 4 April 2018, 12:28 AM

PM (WG/Plat) > SS > PM (YG/RG) > TT

fishingbear · 4 April 2018, 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samson66

I'd put this TT ahead of a many PM's

ap1 · 4 April 2018, 12:33 AM

I have to say this new one is quite attractive - still not sure I’d wear it though

tkdgod · 4 April 2018, 12:34 AM

Never!!!!!

scarlet knight · 4 April 2018, 12:37 AM

I never considered an all PM model due to cost and my impression that it is “over the top.”

I would consider a TT that looks particularly attractive to me, such as the Bluesy, the Black TT Sub or the Chocolate DJ41 with the jubilee Everose bracelet pictured above.

dafuture · 4 April 2018, 12:37 AM

With the new RG GMTs

gliderpilot · 4 April 2018, 12:41 AM

GMT CHNR for 2 reasons:

1) RG is more subtle than YG and the combination of SS, RG, black and brown is well balanced

2) TT with RG accents is more visually interesting (to me) than a watch made entirely of the same metal

peterpl · 4 April 2018, 12:42 AM

PM always wins. The only limiting factor is cost. Dropping $25k+ on a watch is a lot of money. And when 1 piece is not enough well your wallet is in serious trouble. LOL

cchris · 4 April 2018, 12:46 AM

I believe this is an underrated TT.

Snow-Dweller · 4 April 2018, 12:48 AM

I totally agree with the OP.

I’m not big on brown either, but that new TT GMTc looks stunning to me. Last week I tried on both a RG Daydate and RG TT DJ41 just to have a good look at the colour. Then I ordered the new TT GMT.

Let’s have a few pics just for fun (not mine)

Chadridv · 4 April 2018, 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffreyc87

Rarely, to me, is a tt more attractive when compared to its full gold counterpart. As much as I love the tt bluesy, the full yg version is nicer looking.
But when it comes to the new rg gmt chnr...I think the TT version is nicer than the full gold version. I think it’s because the bezel gets washed out sitting up against an entire rg watch where as the tt has ss which draws your eye to the chnr bezel.

What r ur thoughts?

I think i'd still take the full gold in this case. But I totally understand what you're saying. There's very little coloring contrast in this particular model. It's almost a strange choice of color for a rose gold watch.

Chadridv · 4 April 2018, 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snow-Dweller

I totally agree with the OP.

I’m not big on brown either, but that new TT GMTc looks stunning to me. Last week I tried on both a RG Daydate and RG TT DJ41 just to have a good look at the colour. Then I ordered the new TT GMT.

Let’s have a few pics just for fun (not mine)

It's a beautiful watch.

I'm honestly thinking of getting it and wearing it on a brushed glidelock bracelet.

Swiss Mad! · 4 April 2018, 01:15 AM

100% agree

Can't wait to see one in the flesh.

Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

HogwldFLTR · 4 April 2018, 01:36 AM

I'm definitely in the TT CHNR camp and like the way it come together better than the full gold version. Also I'd say with the older TT DJs have become icons and stand on their own versus any other model.

fosbibr · 4 April 2018, 01:59 AM

Never; but I do own a TT Root Beer. If I could find a solid gold one I liked, I would pull the trigger. Same as a sub - some may call me crazy, I'd rather own a YG than a SS. But whatever floats your boat.

3 April 2018, 11:56 PM	#1
Jeffreyc87 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Earth Posts: 369	When is a TT more attractive then full PM? Rarely, to me, is a tt more attractive when compared to its full gold counterpart. As much as I love the tt bluesy, the full yg version is nicer looking. But when it comes to the new rg gmt chnr...I think the TT version is nicer than the full gold version. I think it’s because the bezel gets washed out sitting up against an entire rg watch where as the tt has ss which draws your eye to the chnr bezel. What r ur thoughts?

3 April 2018, 11:58 PM	#3
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	Never to me __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

4 April 2018, 12:10 AM	#9
benlee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Ben Location: SIN & JKT Watch: Rolex, AP, PP Posts: 9,874	No. Full RG is far nicer. TT always give me that "neither here nor there" feeling. Apologies to any TT owners. __________________ Follow me on Instagram : benlee789

4 April 2018, 12:25 AM	#15
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 64,006	I have not owned a TT since 1990 when I owned a Bluesy which I gifted to my brother who still wears it. For the first time since then I like a TT more than full gold model and yes it’s the new GMT CHNR. The watch just looks so right in TT. So we shall see but am contemplating getting one over the full RG to go with new Pepsi. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

4 April 2018, 12:37 AM	#21
dafuture "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: NYC Posts: 1,944	With the new RG GMTs __________________ Current Rolex Submariner 126610LN \|\| Cartier Tank Americaine

3 April 2018, 11:57 PM	#2
dmash Member Join Date: Feb 2017 Location: USA <> BKK Posts: 6,160	Never

4 April 2018, 12:05 AM	#4
justdate "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: RJ Location: UK Coast Watch: PP/AP/Rolex Posts: 1,359	Never for me. Definitely not on the RG GMT either.

4 April 2018, 12:05 AM	#5
soran "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: wait list Watch: Daytona Posts: 551	TT is never more attractive than full PM. And very rarely more attractive than SS. 1. PM 2. SS 3. TT

4 April 2018, 12:06 AM	#6
dmash Member Join Date: Feb 2017 Location: USA <> BKK Posts: 6,160	Haha don’t think these are the responses OP wanted

4 April 2018, 12:08 AM	#7
HorologyK "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: USA Posts: 1,363	TT never. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

4 April 2018, 12:09 AM	#8
bluebeamer "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: Asia Posts: 409	when your bank account says so

4 April 2018, 12:15 AM	#10
Zestywesley "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2017 Location: San Jose Posts: 48	Might be a generational thing as TT is considered cool when I ask most people on this, and full gold is considered too gaudy/douchey. I read that TT is more popular for the younger people these days (sub 25).

4 April 2018, 12:16 AM	#11
samson66 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Downy Ocean Hon Watch: my money leaving! Posts: 13,792	I'd put this TT ahead of a many PM's

4 April 2018, 12:22 AM	#14
mation "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Canada Posts: 35	I am kind of with OP on this one. Actually till the new gmt TT came out I was never a fan of any YG PM or TT. I found the gold colour to be to flashy for my taste. I always liked the white gold PMs, because it was not flashy. But TT GMT is beautiful in my opinion and Id take it over any of the YG or RG models.

4 April 2018, 12:28 AM	#16
4BostonB "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2018 Location: Boston Watch: 116710LN Posts: 196	PM (WG/Plat) > SS > PM (YG/RG) > TT

4 April 2018, 12:33 AM	#18
ap1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,536	I have to say this new one is quite attractive - still not sure I’d wear it though

4 April 2018, 12:34 AM	#19
tkdgod "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: usa Posts: 318	Never!!!!!

4 April 2018, 12:37 AM	#20
scarlet knight "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: USA Watch: Good ones Posts: 8,468	I never considered an all PM model due to cost and my impression that it is “over the top.” I would consider a TT that looks particularly attractive to me, such as the Bluesy, the Black TT Sub or the Chocolate DJ41 with the jubilee Everose bracelet pictured above.

4 April 2018, 12:41 AM	#22
gliderpilot "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Toronto, Canada Watch: your attitude Posts: 135	GMT CHNR for 2 reasons: 1) RG is more subtle than YG and the combination of SS, RG, black and brown is well balanced 2) TT with RG accents is more visually interesting (to me) than a watch made entirely of the same metal

4 April 2018, 12:42 AM	#23
peterpl Banned Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: . Posts: 6,692	PM always wins. The only limiting factor is cost. Dropping $25k+ on a watch is a lot of money. And when 1 piece is not enough well your wallet is in serious trouble. LOL

4 April 2018, 12:46 AM	#24
cchris "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: USA Watch: Hulk Posts: 31	I believe this is an underrated TT. Attached Images

4 April 2018, 12:48 AM	#25
Snow-Dweller 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Real Name: Clive Location: The Alps Watch: collections change Posts: 6,284	I totally agree with the OP. I’m not big on brown either, but that new TT GMTc looks stunning to me. Last week I tried on both a RG Daydate and RG TT DJ41 just to have a good look at the colour. Then I ordered the new TT GMT. Let’s have a few pics just for fun (not mine) __________________ . The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings... ——————————————————————————————————— . 16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. GMW-B5000D.

4 April 2018, 01:15 AM	#28
Swiss Mad! "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Real Name: Max Location: UK Watch: Various Posts: 3,727	100% agree Can't wait to see one in the flesh. Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk __________________ instagram: max.parkin

4 April 2018, 01:36 AM	#29
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,693	I'm definitely in the TT CHNR camp and like the way it come together better than the full gold version. Also I'd say with the older TT DJs have become icons and stand on their own versus any other model. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

4 April 2018, 01:59 AM	#30
fosbibr "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Colorado Posts: 127	Never; but I do own a TT Root Beer. If I could find a solid gold one I liked, I would pull the trigger. Same as a sub - some may call me crazy, I'd rather own a YG than a SS. But whatever floats your boat.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)