ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 June 2018, 05:52 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Diego
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 79
|
Wild Caseback
I've made an offer on a stunning red sub, but there is one quirk - the inside of the case back appears to have been damaged somehow. I can't tell if this is extensive pitting, or (maybe more likely), some kind of grinding something touched it. The sub is otherwise pretty immaculate. Just wonder if anyone has any thoughts on this? I assume it's not a major cause for concern or issue to avoid, since it is not a visible defect, but welcome your thoughts.
BTW, seller stated he was not sure what happened with the caseback, but it's good with the 1680 reference, and dated - he cannot see the exact year but can read II.6?. This is a 2.2m Mark II, meters first sub. The sub comes on a 7206 riveted bracelet with 82 end links and a 4/69 clasp. I believe the seller is reputable and trust that everything is legit, but thought I'd also ask opinions/verifications on the bracelet, end links, and clasp as well. Thanks! |
8 June 2018, 06:44 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
Wild Caseback
Well there is no proof this case back is original to this watch then. It would be difficult n expensive to find loose II69 case back in the wild. Depends on how ocd u r and the final price.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
8 June 2018, 06:50 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,839
|
The back of the mid-case looks REALLY sharp... Dare I say TOO sharp...
I'd like to see more pictures of the rest of the case, with and without the movement if at all possible. If you trust the seller, it might be a really nice, basically unworn watch. But, no matter how nice, there is always bracelet wear and it happens pretty quickly. So, I'm being overly cautious. It may just be the particular photo but I'm concerned clearly. |
8 June 2018, 07:40 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Diego
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 79
|
Thank you. Attached are some additional photos of the watch. It does look only very lightly or perhaps not polished. Is the case too good? I do trust the seller, but I nevertheless value your opinions and thoughts.
And here are some good shots of the lugs. |
8 June 2018, 07:41 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,000
|
Would it be a keeper ... ?
I ask cos, if all else is in order ... and the price allows for the flawed case-back, it might be a nice watch but it will never appeal to hard-core collectors.
I can't imagine why but it almost looks like someone has bounced an engraving tool around the inner case-back, perhaps to obliterate watchmaker inscriptions ? Anyway, that will always be a "Please Explain" aspect of the watch and will always take away value. I've owned similarly flawed watches before , fun to own but they can be very difficult to sell. |
8 June 2018, 07:44 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Diego
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 79
|
Quote:
That's an interesting comment. I would think because, once the back is screwed on, you'd never see or think about it again, that it wouldn't be such a big deal, so long as one can tell it is legit Rolex and a proper 1680 caseback from the right time period, which it appears to be. Thank you for that advice. |
|
8 June 2018, 07:53 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,562
|
thats not pitting. That looks like someone used an engraving pen to remove some marks on the case back. Probably removing service marks - though baffles me why they would do that and agreed that the case looks very new from the back.
Be careful |
8 June 2018, 08:01 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Charles
Location: Montreal, QC
Watch: 1680 Red, 116710
Posts: 359
|
Call it a gut feeling, but I'd really do my due diligence with this one. My opinion. Good luck
__________________
1972 1680 SUB 2018 116710 BLNR 2005 Citizen Skyhawk C651 |
8 June 2018, 08:38 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Diego
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 79
|
Hm. Your responses are disturbing me, as I've already made an offer on the watch (have not received a response, so obviously no payment yet).
Is there anything specific anyone can point to that looks off, other than the case looking "too good"? I mean, the dial looks legit right down to slight marbling in some of the plots (e.g. 4) and hour hand, to slight chips on a few markers. Is it not possible that the watch is authentic and well taken care of? BTW, I also have photos of the open 6 and 9 on the date wheel. |
8 June 2018, 08:51 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: GMT
Posts: 79
|
Always evaluate a vintage watch in its entirety. That midcase is suspect and the dial shot looks a lot of the components don't jive, patinawise.
Funny how the pitting on the caseback managed to miss majority of the pertinent Rolex text engravings. Be extra careful. |
8 June 2018, 09:09 AM | #11 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Diego
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 79
|
Quote:
Quote:
I should say this is a seller with locations in Paris and London, is a member of the Watch Trader Association and International Watch & Jewelry Guild, and is a trusted seller on Chrono24. The seller also has a few 4-digit Daytonas and some other pretty high Rolexes and Pateks for sale. They guarantee the authenticity of all watches, and offer an 85% price buy-back within the first year for any reason (basically for trade-in purposes). It just does not "smell" like fraud or insincerity to me. That does not mean someone isn't mistaken, but they are claiming to be expert and guaranteeing authenticity... Would still love to hear more opinions, especially with specific details. One note: the case markings (model and serial) look legit to me, and the photos are pretty close up and details, so I feel like that'd be something that'd probably look off if it were. Thanks! |
||
8 June 2018, 09:37 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 215
|
Not an expert.
Chamfers on the lugs look really shallow to me. The back of the case looks very sharp, as someone else said. The corners of the crown guards(backside) look off to me. |
8 June 2018, 09:42 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,839
|
Let me comment again after the added photos.
I am happy to see bracelet wear between the lugs as well as traces of crevice corrosion where the case back goes on. There should be CORRESPONDING crevice corrosion evidence on the back, where they were aligned while corroding. The mid Case looks more convincing now. Lug sides have been polished but it is not terrible at all. Dial and hands look pretty good to me. Lume color match is close. Very close. That’s good. Tell tale for me on a “fake” dial is not there. I believe it is a genuine dial. If the price is correct then it’s a good buy. That case back will cause heartburn when it is sold again but if the corrosion is aligned it’s original in my book. Crystal is clearly aftermarket. Bezel ring is also quite polished but that isn’t a deal breaker. Just pointing it out. |
8 June 2018, 10:19 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
Here are my observations, take it with a grain of salt.
I’m speculating this watch had a hard life. First of all, the lume on both the markers and hands are quite lite for a 50 yr old watch. So that means it’s been exposed to sunlight most of its life on someone wrist. The mid case has been polished rather poorly. Maybe it had many scratches and dents. The same can probably be said to the case back, hence someone tried to replace it with another from a different period. (I would probably say it’s almost impossible to find a late 60’s case back). The bezel is almost brand new, too minty for a 50 yr old watch. The bezel is usually the first to soften from use. The insert is from early 80’s, so it’s been replaced. Personally I feel when u r collecting such an iconic watch, u would want everything to be original. That’s the reason why u r lusting after that tiny little red text on the dial, no? This watch is not perfect. If it’s mine I would send the mid case for refinishing. Find the proper insert, either long 5 or kissing 40. Hoping my lucky star is shining to let me find a 68 or 69 case back. If you are a patient guy, then maybe u will enjoy doing all of these. That said, it’s still a meter first red sub. Parts alone are worth ten of thousands. If the price is really good then go ahead. Otherwise, I feel you might get buyer remorse. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
8 June 2018, 11:45 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Diego
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 79
|
Thank you for those comments, J!m and omitohud. I feel like I'm being pulled in both directions a little bit now. It's maybe got some problems, but seems overall genuine, correct? But maybe not original is case back, bezel, bezel insert, crown (triplock), and crystal?
Assume I don't mind the case back issue so much. I really love the dial. I like the contrast of the almost stark white markers with the bright red "submariner." My offer was approximately $26.5k. Good buy or too much? Another one I'm considering is at craft & tailored, here - https://www.craftandtailored.com/col...1680-mk-v-dial It's pretty similar, but there is more marbling in the markers, and a little oil staining on the hands, and it's a Mark IV. Claims to be unpolished. Do you all feel this is a better buy at about $22k? I can always keep looking, of course. I actually do have one more on my short list, which is very different (Mark IV, yellow patina, blueing insert), also claims to be unpolished. Here's a quick pic. |
8 June 2018, 12:14 PM | #16 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
Not for nothing, but a 2.29x,xxx serial 1680 should be REGISTERED DESIGN, Not Orig Reg Design, eh? As for the caseback? Engravers Gone Wild.
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
|
8 June 2018, 12:44 PM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,030
|
I personally would prefer the Craft&Tailored Red Sub.
|
8 June 2018, 12:49 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
Quote:
Good catch. It didn’t register with my mind. The case is way much later then. It should be just registered design. In this case, I would avoid this watch like a plague. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
8 June 2018, 01:01 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: usofmfa
Posts: 3,157
|
Oh, fake. Case is aftermarket.
__________________
Instagram: soundsoserious |
8 June 2018, 01:02 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,839
|
Yep! Right in my face and I missed it. “Can’t see the Forrest through the trees!”
Possibly a service replacement case. I don’t think that insert is 80’s vintage, maybe late 70’s (looks a lot like my ‘78 9411 insert) so perhaps it got a second lease on life at that point. Probably not worth more than 15k as parts I’m guessing. I wouldn’t pay more than that (Assuming I had that). Most of it in the dial and hands. So maybe that is the original case back but the rest of the case is newer... interesting piece. |
8 June 2018, 01:28 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: Georgia
Watch: All of them
Posts: 579
|
Looks like the date bubble may be polished down since it has poor mag vs aftermarket.
Those modern style thin chamfers are either recut or perhaps replacement cases did not have the nice thick ones.
__________________
Current:
Rolex Daytona 116500 | Rolex Submariner 116610 | Zenith El Primero 03.2150.400/69 Past: Rolex Sea Dweller 126600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 16600 | Rolex Submariner 16610 | Rolex Submariner 1680 |
8 June 2018, 01:44 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
|
8 June 2018, 01:49 PM | #23 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
Hard Pass
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
|
8 June 2018, 01:49 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SoCal
Watch: 1675 GMT/1680 MKIV
Posts: 319
|
Good eye guys ,myself i like the 3rd one with the nicer patina ,i'm not a fan of the stark white look (just doesn't look vintage) & the 3rd one has a nice fat almost kissing 40
__________________
Rolex 1680 Red Submariner MKIV Full set Rolex 1675 Pepsi GMT Full set Rolex 1675 GMT Radial dial Full set TAG Heuer Carrera Chronograph Day Date Bell & Ross BR03-92 |
8 June 2018, 01:53 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Diego
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 79
|
Thanks a lot guys. I actually was researching this myself, "Registered Design" versus "Orig Rolex Design" to see if that was right, but I hadn't found an answer yet.
Whew. Thanks for saving me the headache. With that case issue, that tips the scale for me to a hard no. Too bad, love this dial. |
8 June 2018, 03:30 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,418
|
Fake case and caseback to start. Very similar caseback s were sold on eBay by a known faker 2-3 years ago his practice ones I had assumed.
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting |
8 June 2018, 09:26 PM | #27 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
I got suckered in on one four years back, got a refund and reported but he is still there.
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.