ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Biblebanger · 17 May 2006, 02:47 AM

Omega Seamaster 2254.50 - I have owned this watch for 10 months now. Here are the strong features that I like.

- Versatility - This watch seems to go with any dress situation. I wore it with 3 different suits at a four day convention in Las Vegas and I felt very confident that it looked fine. On the other hand I wear it with jeans or khakis to my office every day and always on the golf course. it never seems out of place.

- Fit and Finish - I love the finish of this watch. I have shopped many brands and the Omega is right up there with the best. It just looks and feels really solid. Some watches will rattle a little bit and the Omega never does.

- Ergonomics - The look and design of this watch are all really thought out nicely. The size of the face is nice and large and the bezel just goes perfectly in accordance with the face. The bracelet has a beautiful taper to it and just seems to flow nicely from the clasp to the case when it is on your wrist.

Still my favorite!!!

Breitling Aeromarine SuperOcean Steelfish X-Plus. Just received a blue face model from my wife for Christmas on the 22nd.

Bold Styling - This watch is in your face. I love the round applied markers with the luminova along with the blue face. This is the watches best feature. I actually like the polished finish on this watch. I did not like it on my seamaster but it just seems to look right on the fish. The overall appearance of the watch is just rugged and beautiful all at the same time. One more thing to add is that I love the AR coating on the crystal. I know that there is a tendency for it to scratch easier but it looks really awesome. It is also much easier to photograph.

Eye catching - This watch demands attention and gets it. I was shopping for a couple of days with my wife and I had two men at different stores ask me about my watch. One of them knew it was a Breitling and the other did not. I am not a vain person but sometimes it is nice for someone to notice the watch that you are wearing. It gives you an opportunity to talk about watches.(None of us like to do that do we?)

Now I will compare the two watches to each other.

Fit and finish - The Omega is better in this regard. The movement seems smoother and is more refined plus I think has a little better reserve(44hours vs. 42).

Versatility - goes to the Omega. I do not think I could wear the fish with just anything. I also think that if I tried to wear it on the golf course I would probably loose 10mph off of my clubhead speed. This thing is heavy.
(All you golfers will know what I am talking about.)

Bracelet - Both are beautiful and finished very nicely. I will be interested to see which one stands up to scratches better.

Clasp - Anyone who owns a Breitling know that the clasp is tough and very sturdy. Although it is kind of tight I about tore my fingernail off trying to take it on and off to show my friends over the last couple of days. It should break in after a while. It really makes me appreciate the Omega two button unit. The Seamaster IMHO is almost perfect.

Some random comparisons:

Depth Rating(Useless to me but still cool)

SMP 1000ft - Fish 6600ft

Diameter

SMP 41mm - Fish 44mm(does not feel this large)

Thickness

SMP 11mm - Fish 16mm

Movement

SMP Omega 1120(ETA 2892mod) - Fish Breitling 17(ETA 2824fin)

Bracelet

SMP 20/18 - Fish 22/20

List price/Price paid

SMP 2150/1395 - Fish 2470/1675

In closing, I have owned my Seamaster for 10 months and only one person has ever asked me about it. It is a very subtle watch. Which is alright by me. I had owned the Breitling for 6 days and already 4 people had asked me about the watch. It is kind of nice to have a watch that stands out once in a while.

Taking this into consideration I beleive these two will serve me well depending on what kind of mood I am in. Very nice contrast and a lot of dress options.

Thank you for reading my long winded review.

A few more pictures

C.J. · 17 May 2006, 02:52 AM

edt

padi56 · 17 May 2006, 02:56 AM

Good review, like the Omega, a very underrated brand IMHO.

worktolivelife · 17 May 2006, 04:56 AM

hi haj,
that 1st shot is stunning

steve

toddb · 29 October 2007, 02:06 PM

HOWS the accuracy with the 'ling? any QC issues, at all with the "B"?

Perdu · 23 November 2007, 05:30 AM

The Omega Seamaster 2254.50 is a superb design. I think it is one of Omega's finest - a modern classic. It's is very close to the Sub.Date as a watch and Omega's dial finishing is the best I've seen. I hear good things about the cal.1120 too. Thanks for the review.

frostie · 23 November 2007, 05:31 AM

The first pic is really amazing

vitacura · 23 November 2007, 10:06 AM

Very nice review! I love my Seamaster..

frostie · 23 November 2007, 05:30 PM

By the way the review was awesome

vukotab · 28 November 2007, 12:30 AM

You have a wonderful pair of timepieces.
Like most of the guys here I like the Seamaster,too.But I think that Breitling is a great and unfortunately underrated watch.
I got Breitling SuperOcean(not the Steelfish),but basicaly the same watch powered with same caliber,with some lower depth rating(5000ft instead of 6000ft),and it`s very good and reliable watch.And very precise indeed!
Here are few photos of mine!

haakon59 · 16 December 2007, 10:34 AM

Thanks for the review and pictures. For some reason, sometimes the Breitling doesn't get mentioned as often as other divers despite it toughness and general suitability.

Todd V · 17 December 2007, 07:09 AM

Great review and those and some really nice lume photos!

Here's a not so good photo of the lume on my Superocean.

Love those arabic numerals!

ssadove · 18 December 2007, 09:46 AM

Just thought i would add to this thread since my son has the Omega (which I gave to him) and I have it and the Breitling. i have to say that personally my experience is that they are both great and equally good watches. I find time accuracy to basically be equal between them. the ruggedness of each of these has been put to the test as I am a wildlife biologist working with marine mammals and sea turtles and wear my watches when i work. They have been on me when i have been thrown by whales and one has been bitten by a seal. No damage or marks (on the watch that is, me a different story). Now for the bad news. i have to say i have become partial to the B. One it is the one I do get comments on (guess a little bling goes out). Second, the omega looks so much like my Roles Sub that i sort of feel like why wear it in place of the Rolex. So that is my two cents, guess I should add that my B has a blue face, which I love
Good luck to you guys
Cheers

kingblackbolt · 18 December 2007, 10:21 AM

Great review! Those particular models are both highly wearable but for completely different reasons... if you really like the blue face of your Fish then maybe you should consider the SMP Chrono?

applebook · 7 January 2008, 03:18 PM

I agree regarding Omega's being underrated. The ONLY reason why I sold my black SMP was because it was too big for my puny wrists. Congrats on yours!

CPCC · 22 January 2008, 04:12 PM

Really like the blue face it is fantastic.

JBat · 23 January 2008, 02:23 AM

Nice write-up Biblebanger. I've had my SMP for 5 years now, and it's indeed a terrific watch. Omegas are very good.

roadcarver · 23 January 2008, 02:28 AM

I've had the chance to own the Steelfish for a month or so, and its a good hefty watch. Pro II is substantial and goes well with the 44mm watch.

duc748 · 5 February 2008, 02:59 PM

Well done. :)

tandrup · 5 February 2008, 05:10 PM

Great review!

jimjo · 11 February 2008, 10:05 PM

I have been contemplating whether to get myself at Steelfish. After reading your review, my mind is now certain. I will get one! Thks. Great review.

etp095 · 24 February 2008, 12:36 AM

i'm liking that steelfish a whole lot.

jasonbellevue · 16 March 2008, 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by etp095

i'm liking that steelfish a whole lot.

Me too. I almost got one this morning, the AD didn't budge from 25% off MSRP.

daunwaun · 25 March 2008, 01:40 PM

Nice review!!!

mikea · 24 April 2008, 04:49 AM

have the smp and steelfish and i love them both.

Terry Newton · 24 April 2008, 06:08 AM

Nice Review.

Terry Newton

mickeydainish · 13 June 2008, 09:47 PM

Love that SMP man...!! :-)

mickeydainish · 13 June 2008, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingblackbolt

Great review! Those particular models are both highly wearable but for completely different reasons... if you really like the blue face of your Fish then maybe you should consider the SMP Chrono?

Love that Chrono!!! :-)

glimmer · 4 July 2008, 03:33 PM

Nice, unbiased review...thanks for putting things in that perspective!

Personally I prefer these kinds of reviews instead of the "side by side", pseudo objective/subjective.

Glimmer

Silmarillion · 4 July 2008, 09:59 PM

thanx for the nice review)

17 May 2006, 02:47 AM	#1
Biblebanger Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Fargo Posts: 116	Omega Seamaster and Breitling SO Steelfish Review Omega Seamaster 2254.50 - I have owned this watch for 10 months now. Here are the strong features that I like. - Versatility - This watch seems to go with any dress situation. I wore it with 3 different suits at a four day convention in Las Vegas and I felt very confident that it looked fine. On the other hand I wear it with jeans or khakis to my office every day and always on the golf course. it never seems out of place. - Fit and Finish - I love the finish of this watch. I have shopped many brands and the Omega is right up there with the best. It just looks and feels really solid. Some watches will rattle a little bit and the Omega never does. - Ergonomics - The look and design of this watch are all really thought out nicely. The size of the face is nice and large and the bezel just goes perfectly in accordance with the face. The bracelet has a beautiful taper to it and just seems to flow nicely from the clasp to the case when it is on your wrist. Still my favorite!!! Breitling Aeromarine SuperOcean Steelfish X-Plus. Just received a blue face model from my wife for Christmas on the 22nd. Bold Styling - This watch is in your face. I love the round applied markers with the luminova along with the blue face. This is the watches best feature. I actually like the polished finish on this watch. I did not like it on my seamaster but it just seems to look right on the fish. The overall appearance of the watch is just rugged and beautiful all at the same time. One more thing to add is that I love the AR coating on the crystal. I know that there is a tendency for it to scratch easier but it looks really awesome. It is also much easier to photograph. Eye catching - This watch demands attention and gets it. I was shopping for a couple of days with my wife and I had two men at different stores ask me about my watch. One of them knew it was a Breitling and the other did not. I am not a vain person but sometimes it is nice for someone to notice the watch that you are wearing. It gives you an opportunity to talk about watches.(None of us like to do that do we?) Now I will compare the two watches to each other. Fit and finish - The Omega is better in this regard. The movement seems smoother and is more refined plus I think has a little better reserve(44hours vs. 42). Versatility - goes to the Omega. I do not think I could wear the fish with just anything. I also think that if I tried to wear it on the golf course I would probably loose 10mph off of my clubhead speed. This thing is heavy. (All you golfers will know what I am talking about.) Bracelet - Both are beautiful and finished very nicely. I will be interested to see which one stands up to scratches better. Clasp - Anyone who owns a Breitling know that the clasp is tough and very sturdy. Although it is kind of tight I about tore my fingernail off trying to take it on and off to show my friends over the last couple of days. It should break in after a while. It really makes me appreciate the Omega two button unit. The Seamaster IMHO is almost perfect. Some random comparisons: Depth Rating(Useless to me but still cool) SMP 1000ft - Fish 6600ft Diameter SMP 41mm - Fish 44mm(does not feel this large) Thickness SMP 11mm - Fish 16mm Movement SMP Omega 1120(ETA 2892mod) - Fish Breitling 17(ETA 2824fin) Bracelet SMP 20/18 - Fish 22/20 List price/Price paid SMP 2150/1395 - Fish 2470/1675 In closing, I have owned my Seamaster for 10 months and only one person has ever asked me about it. It is a very subtle watch. Which is alright by me. I had owned the Breitling for 6 days and already 4 people had asked me about the watch. It is kind of nice to have a watch that stands out once in a while. Taking this into consideration I beleive these two will serve me well depending on what kind of mood I am in. Very nice contrast and a lot of dress options. Thank you for reading my long winded review. A few more pictures Last edited by Biblebanger; 17 May 2006 at 02:53 AM.. Reason: Change title

17 May 2006, 02:52 AM	#2
C.J. "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: * Posts: 10,196	edt __________________ Me? I'm still looking for Kokomo. I just hope that damn golfer isn't there Last edited by C.J.; 25 May 2006 at 05:59 AM..

17 May 2006, 02:56 AM	#3
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 53,060	Good review, like the Omega, a very underrated brand IMHO. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

23 November 2007, 05:30 AM	#6
Perdu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Gary Location: GMT-6 Watch: GMT Posts: 3,350	The Omega Seamaster 2254.50 is a superb design. I think it is one of Omega's finest - a modern classic. It's is very close to the Sub.Date as a watch and Omega's dial finishing is the best I've seen. I hear good things about the cal.1120 too. Thanks for the review. __________________ Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter

28 November 2007, 12:30 AM	#10
vukotab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Vukota Brajovi Location: Belgrade,Serbia Watch: ing movies! Posts: 3,812	Nice review! You have a wonderful pair of timepieces. Like most of the guys here I like the Seamaster,too.But I think that Breitling is a great and unfortunately underrated watch. I got Breitling SuperOcean(not the Steelfish),but basicaly the same watch powered with same caliber,with some lower depth rating(5000ft instead of 6000ft),and it`s very good and reliable watch.And very precise indeed! Here are few photos of mine! Attached Images

17 May 2006, 04:56 AM	#4
worktolivelife "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: UK Posts: 1,365	hi haj, that 1st shot is stunning steve

29 October 2007, 02:06 PM	#5
toddb "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: TB Location: SO Cal. Watch: Xplorer 40 Posts: 216	HOWS the accuracy with the 'ling? any QC issues, at all with the "B"?

23 November 2007, 05:31 AM	#7
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	The first pic is really amazing

23 November 2007, 10:06 AM	#8
vitacura "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Florida, USA Posts: 290	Very nice review! I love my Seamaster..

23 November 2007, 05:30 PM	#9
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	By the way the review was awesome

16 December 2007, 10:34 AM	#11
haakon59 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Seattle Posts: 1,571	Thanks for the review and pictures. For some reason, sometimes the Breitling doesn't get mentioned as often as other divers despite it toughness and general suitability.

17 December 2007, 07:09 AM	#12
Todd V Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Philadelphia Posts: 41	Superocean - Love it Great review and those and some really nice lume photos! Here's a not so good photo of the lume on my Superocean. Love those arabic numerals! Attached Images

18 December 2007, 09:46 AM	#13
ssadove "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: New York Posts: 4	Breitling Superocean Just thought i would add to this thread since my son has the Omega (which I gave to him) and I have it and the Breitling. i have to say that personally my experience is that they are both great and equally good watches. I find time accuracy to basically be equal between them. the ruggedness of each of these has been put to the test as I am a wildlife biologist working with marine mammals and sea turtles and wear my watches when i work. They have been on me when i have been thrown by whales and one has been bitten by a seal. No damage or marks (on the watch that is, me a different story). Now for the bad news. i have to say i have become partial to the B. One it is the one I do get comments on (guess a little bling goes out). Second, the omega looks so much like my Roles Sub that i sort of feel like why wear it in place of the Rolex. So that is my two cents, guess I should add that my B has a blue face, which I love Good luck to you guys Cheers

18 December 2007, 10:21 AM	#14
kingblackbolt "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Ren Location: Toronto On Canada Posts: 1,886	Great review! Those particular models are both highly wearable but for completely different reasons... if you really like the blue face of your Fish then maybe you should consider the SMP Chrono? Attached Images __________________ “Hail to the king, baby" Ash (Army of Darkness 1992)

7 January 2008, 03:18 PM	#15
applebook "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: vancouver Posts: 1,918	I agree regarding Omega's being underrated. The ONLY reason why I sold my black SMP was because it was too big for my puny wrists. Congrats on yours!

22 January 2008, 04:12 PM	#16
CPCC "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Bill Location: USA Posts: 1,857	Really like the blue face it is fantastic. __________________

23 January 2008, 02:23 AM	#17
JBat "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: John Location: Washington Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ Posts: 7,329	Nice write-up Biblebanger. I've had my SMP for 5 years now, and it's indeed a terrific watch. Omegas are very good.

23 January 2008, 02:28 AM	#18
roadcarver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Vernon Location: C-a-n-a-d-a Watch: 16600 Posts: 5,641	I've had the chance to own the Steelfish for a month or so, and its a good hefty watch. Pro II is substantial and goes well with the 44mm watch. __________________ I'm just a cook...

5 February 2008, 02:59 PM	#19
duc748 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: madison, wi Posts: 117	Well done. :)

5 February 2008, 05:10 PM	#20
tandrup "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: USA Watch: 14060M Posts: 921	Great review! __________________ Regards, Lars 14060M, 16570 White, 116200 Tuxedo Dial Georg Jensen 2347

11 February 2008, 10:05 PM	#21
jimjo "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Singapore Posts: 1	I have been contemplating whether to get myself at Steelfish. After reading your review, my mind is now certain. I will get one! Thks. Great review.

24 February 2008, 12:36 AM	#22
etp095 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: rudolph Location: chicago burbs Posts: 2,026	i'm liking that steelfish a whole lot.

25 March 2008, 01:40 PM	#24
daunwaun "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Ken Location: toronto Watch: 18K YG Day Date Posts: 2,985	Nice review!!! __________________ DAUNWAUN

24 April 2008, 04:49 AM	#25
mikea "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: mike Location: Dallas, Tx Watch: Rolex and AP Posts: 1,088	have the smp and steelfish and i love them both.

24 April 2008, 06:08 AM	#26
Terry Newton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Terry Newton Location: Michigan Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c Posts: 6,644	Nice Review. Terry Newton __________________ Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc

13 June 2008, 09:47 PM	#27
mickeydainish Banned Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Michael Location: LaLa Land Watch: Sub Date 16610 Posts: 1,757	Love that SMP man...!! :-)

4 July 2008, 03:33 PM	#29
glimmer Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Here, everywhere Posts: 1,244	Nice, unbiased review...thanks for putting things in that perspective! Personally I prefer these kinds of reviews instead of the "side by side", pseudo objective/subjective. Glimmer

4 July 2008, 09:59 PM	#30
Silmarillion "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Delaware Posts: 5	thanx for the nice review)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)