ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jay_kay · 9 September 2018, 01:59 AM

Way back since last July when I got my 126600 I have wondered what it would look like with no cyclops.

Today whilst browsing through the internet I came across this image.

I have seen a couple of photoshopped images of what it could look like.

But the actual removed cyclops it makes the date look too far it. This could be due to the larger dial and lack of the huge rehaut like on the DSSD and possibly why they made the decision to add a cyclops.

On this photo of mine it does appear that the date aperture is well to the left of the cyclops.

Please ignore the dust!

9 September 2018, 01:59 AM	#1
jay_kay "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Barrowford Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54 Posts: 1,699	Rolex 126600 with cyclops removed. Way back since last July when I got my 126600 I have wondered what it would look like with no cyclops. Today whilst browsing through the internet I came across this image. I have seen a couple of photoshopped images of what it could look like. But the actual removed cyclops it makes the date look too far it. This could be due to the larger dial and lack of the huge rehaut like on the DSSD and possibly why they made the decision to add a cyclops. On this photo of mine it does appear that the date aperture is well to the left of the cyclops. Please ignore the dust! __________________ Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)