The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 November 2018, 03:51 PM   #1
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Oyster perpetual date vs datejust

Am I missing something here? Other then the bracelet what would be the biggest difference in buying these 2 models? If I wanted a 39mm oyster band smooth bezel without the pcls for thousands less then the DJ what would stop me? I know fluted and jubilee but for this point let’s compare it to the DJ41 smooth and oyster for considerably less money. Am I missing something? I honestly didn’t even know a oyster perpetual can come with a date. I always thought It was more of an entry level watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2018, 06:18 PM   #2
hhtwaijri
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 185
The oyster perpetual does not have a date, that the main difference...

The DJ has polished steel oyster bracelet, while the OP has brushed steel (better looking IMO).

The DJ has a wider and flatter bezel, while the OP has a slight thinner and domed bell.

I would personally go with OP.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
hhtwaijri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2018, 06:29 PM   #3
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by hhtwaijri View Post
The oyster perpetual does not have a date, that the main difference...

The DJ has polished steel oyster bracelet, while the OP has brushed steel (better looking IMO).

The DJ has a wider and flatter bezel, while the OP has a slight thinner and domed bell.

I would personally go with OP.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk




I thought that too but it seems as though they are putting dates on some oyster perpetuals? I’m confused and not sure one is worth 3k more then the other?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2018, 07:05 PM   #4
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
After doing a little research I think the biggest oyster with date they make is 34mm? Do they make a 39mm with date?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2018, 08:47 PM   #5
rootbeer7
2024 Pledge Member
 
rootbeer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
Oyster Perpetual Date 34mm. Datejust 28, 31, 36 and now 41 I think.
__________________
@imrootbeer7
rootbeer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2018, 03:11 AM   #6
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by teabags001 View Post
Am I missing something here? Other then the bracelet what would be the biggest difference in buying these 2 models? If I wanted a 39mm oyster band smooth bezel without the pcls for thousands less then the DJ what would stop me?. . .
Nothing stops you. The Datejust offers more options and dials, more than any other model.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2018, 04:54 AM   #7
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Nothing stops you. The Datejust offers more options and dials, more than any other model.


I didn’t know the 39 didn’t come with a date. And the DJ41 being a 39.5 watch. If I was looking for a smooth with oyster band and date why wouldn’t you go with the OP date over the datejust. But the biggest OP with date is 34mm. Now get your wife the OP over the DJ36 and save 3k. And it will for her better if she has smaller wrist. ;)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2018, 04:54 AM   #8
dubins930
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dubins930's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Aaron
Location: WA
Posts: 840
OP date is 34mm... DJ is 36 or 41.... if you can rock a 34mm I would take an OP date for sure
dubins930 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2018, 01:56 PM   #9
mmmmp
"TRF" Member
 
mmmmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mark P
Location: Toronto
Watch: SS Wimbledon DJ41
Posts: 2,046
Some great info here.

IMO - the 34mm OP Date is too small. I've tried it on and it doesn't work for me. The 39mm is okay, but a little plain. I really liked the DJ41 which is the nicest Rolex I've ever owned. (I've had about 5 over the last 30 years.)

Go try em all on, compare and even go back a few times to be sure. You'll find the one that sings to you, price not withstanding.

Good luck,
Mark

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
mmmmp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2018, 04:51 PM   #10
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmmp View Post
Some great info here.

IMO - the 34mm OP Date is too small. I've tried it on and it doesn't work for me. The 39mm is okay, but a little plain. I really liked the DJ41 which is the nicest Rolex I've ever owned. (I've had about 5 over the last 30 years.)

Go try em all on, compare and even go back a few times to be sure. You'll find the one that sings to you, price not withstanding.

Good luck,
Mark

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk


Thanks. I was just curious about the OP date because I am a DJ fan. Couldn’t see a reason to buy a DJ smooth oyster if you could get the OP date and save a few grand. But Being the biggest size is a 34 I guess they realized if they made a 39mm OP date it would eat into the DJ sales. That being said I bought the DJ41 black fluted jubilee with sticks. I loved it. It just wore too small for me as a every day watch. Not a huge Sports model fan. I flipped it for a DJ ll diamond dial rhodium oyster and couldn’t be happier. If the DJ41 wore just a little bigger I would have kept it forever.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2018, 08:41 AM   #11
mmmmp
"TRF" Member
 
mmmmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mark P
Location: Toronto
Watch: SS Wimbledon DJ41
Posts: 2,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by teabags001 View Post
Thanks. I was just curious about the OP date because I am a DJ fan. Couldn’t see a reason to buy a DJ smooth oyster if you could get the OP date and save a few grand. But Being the biggest size is a 34 I guess they realized if they made a 39mm OP date it would eat into the DJ sales. That being said I bought the DJ41 black fluted jubilee with sticks. I loved it. It just wore too small for me as a every day watch. Not a huge Sports model fan. I flipped it for a DJ ll diamond dial rhodium oyster and couldn’t be happier. If the DJ41 wore just a little bigger I would have kept it forever.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sounds like you made a sensible, and very cool purchase. The DJ41 and the DJII are both beautiful pieces, I'm sure you'll enjoy yours for years. As I mentioned, I Can't seem to shut up about my new DJ41, but I scored the Wimbledon dial with fluted / Jubilee and I couldn't be happier. The new movement and better regulation keeps mine running at a solid -1 per day. Add in the easy-link clasp and 'super' (solid link) Jubilee and I'll say Rolex came up with a winner. A decent price, no waiting lists makes me happy to be a DJ fan. (I've tried, but as nice as the Subs, GMT's are, I'm also not a sports/tool watch guy.)

Wear your watch in good health.
Mark.

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
mmmmp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2018, 08:59 AM   #12
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Call me crazy, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say the seller who posted that as an "oyseter perpetual" got the size wrong. Is there a model number associated with that screen cap? As far as I am aware, the OP Dates stop at 34mm, and are actually listed on the Rolex website under the DJ line. The stand-alone OPs are non-date designs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by teabags001 View Post
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2018, 09:29 AM   #13
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
Call me crazy, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say the seller who posted that as an "oyseter perpetual" got the size wrong. Is there a model number associated with that screen cap? As far as I am aware, the OP Dates stop at 34mm, and are actually listed on the Rolex website under the DJ line. The stand-alone OPs are non-date designs.


I agree with you. I think this is a 34mm and the person posted it as a 39mm which got me confused.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2018, 09:45 AM   #14
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Oyster perpetual date vs datejust

Quote:
Originally Posted by teabags001 View Post
Thanks. I was just curious about the OP date because I am a DJ fan. Couldn’t see a reason to buy a DJ smooth oyster if you could get the OP date and save a few grand. But Being the biggest size is a 34 I guess they realized if they made a 39mm OP date it would eat into the DJ sales. That being said I bought the DJ41 black fluted jubilee with sticks. I loved it. It just wore too small for me as a every day watch. Not a huge Sports model fan. I flipped it for a DJ ll diamond dial rhodium oyster and couldn’t be happier. If the DJ41 wore just a little bigger I would have kept it forever.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I agree that the DJ41 is the better watch. And I wanted to love it. But it just wore too small for my wrist. The DJll fits better. Is heavier I love the bigger bezel. Knowing all that I still bought the DJ41. Just didn’t wear like I wanted it too. So at the end of the day I gave the DJll a chance and it’s perfect for me. I almost got the DJll Wimbledon 2 tone. But decided on the stainless diamond dial. Wasn’t a fan of the Battons being so fat. So romans or diamond dial for me. I can tell you with the larger bezel the diamond dial really pops. Wouldn’t get diamonds on the DJ41 as the battons on that model are very nice.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2018, 09:55 AM   #15
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
That diamond rhodium DJII is an awesome model. It's the one DJII model that I thought hung together proportionally. I think I would prefer that to the equivalent model in the DJ41. With stick indexes, though, it's DJ41 all the way.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2018, 10:02 AM   #16
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
115200 is the reference. It's 34mm with a 19mm bracelet.

__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2018, 12:38 PM   #17
watchguy14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 2
Correct - it is 34mm. Here's my silver one. Sort of halfway between an OP and a DJ, with the size of the OP34 but look and feel of a smooth-bezel Datejust.
Attached Images
 
watchguy14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2018, 02:59 PM   #18
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchguy14 View Post
Correct - it is 34mm. Here's my silver one. Sort of halfway between an OP and a DJ, with the size of the OP34 but look and feel of a smooth-bezel Datejust.


Awesome watch. If I had the wrist I would definitely get the one you have. Wear in good health.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2018, 03:02 PM   #19
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
That diamond rhodium DJII is an awesome model. It's the one DJII model that I thought hung together proportionally. I think I would prefer that to the equivalent model in the DJ41. With stick indexes, though, it's DJ41 all the way.


I love the rhodium stick dial with fluted and jubilee. Or oyster with smooth. Actually it’s the only DJ I like with smooth and jubilee. To me that’s my favorite Rolex DJ. But since I can’t wear it since it wears small on my wrist I went with the rhodium diamond DJll which is my favorite DJll. I envy those who can pull off the DJ41. Who knew just a couple of mm would make such a difference. That and I love the bigger fluted bezel.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2018, 03:06 PM   #20
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by sillo38 View Post
115200 is the reference. It's 34mm with a 19mm bracelet.



That is a good looking watch. I prefer it to the DJ36 to be honest knowing I saved a few grand. Those with smaller wrist have all the fun in the watch world. 34-40mm would be better then my 41-43 preference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2018, 03:27 PM   #21
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by teabags001 View Post
Am I missing something here? Other then the bracelet what would be the biggest difference in buying these 2 models? If I wanted a 39mm oyster band smooth bezel without the pcls for thousands less then the DJ what would stop me? I know fluted and jubilee but for this point let’s compare it to the DJ41 smooth and oyster for considerably less money. Am I missing something? I honestly didn’t even know a oyster perpetual can come with a date. I always thought It was more of an entry level watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The only watch under the Oyster Perpetual moniker with a date is the 34mm Date. Strange it's not considered a DJ. FWIW, the DJ41 is actually 39.5mm/
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2018, 04:00 PM   #22
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Oyster perpetual date vs datejust

Quote:
Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR View Post
The only watch under the Oyster Perpetual moniker with a date is the 34mm Date. Strange it's not considered a DJ. FWIW, the DJ41 is actually 39.5mm/


Yeah. I tried the DJ41 but most of the people on this forum said it looked like a 36mm on my wrist. So if a 39.5 wears small there is no way I could pull off a 34mm watch. But I think it looks amazing. The DJll (41.2mm) fits me like a glove.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 November 2018, 01:53 AM   #23
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by teabags001 View Post
That is a good looking watch. I prefer it to the DJ36 to be honest knowing I saved a few grand. Those with smaller wrist have all the fun in the watch world. 34-40mm would be better then my 41-43 preference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah too small for me... it's my girlfriend's lol. But it's a beautiful watch either way and does wear a little larger than your typical 34mm.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR View Post
Strange it's not considered a DJ.
Think this goes back to when 34mm was still a mans watch. So this was considered the cheaper alternative to the DJ, but they didn't want to give it the DJ name to encourage people to buy the more expensive one. That's my guess at least.
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 November 2018, 04:35 AM   #24
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by sillo38 View Post
Yeah too small for me... it's my girlfriend's lol. But it's a beautiful watch either way and does wear a little larger than your typical 34mm.



Think this goes back to when 34mm was still a mans watch. So this was considered the cheaper alternative to the DJ, but they didn't want to give it the DJ name to encourage people to buy the more expensive one. That's my guess at least.


I wonder if they made the OP 39 date how much would that cut into the DJ41 sales? I prefer the domed bezel over the smooth as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 November 2018, 04:50 AM   #25
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
I believe you can get a DJ41 with the smooth bezel.
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 November 2018, 07:15 AM   #26
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by sillo38 View Post
I believe you can get a DJ41 with the smooth bezel.


Smooth but not domed. Domed looks better imo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2018, 12:55 AM   #27
Newrolexguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Charlotte nc
Posts: 76
When did production stop for the 34mm date?
Newrolexguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2018, 01:51 AM   #28
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newrolexguy View Post
When did production stop for the 34mm date?
It didn't, you can still get it.

https://www.rolex.com/watches/dateju...5200-0007.html
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.