SD 16600 vs 116600

[GaloCinza]

I was looking for a used SD and realized the huge price difference between similar models: the 16600 and the short-lived 116600.

Ceramic bezel is an obvious differences, but does it make sense for a 50% premium? Om the other hand i love the vintage look and feel of the 16600!

Any special insight to change my mind?


Enviado do meu iPhone usando Tapatalk

[superstarmar]

I can't speak for the 16600 but I had a 116600...
If you can go for the Ceramic go for it...
The wrist presence, solid link bracelet and glide lock plus
the ceramic bezel are just perfect... Nice heft too but
comfortable... A perfect daily...

[glamorama]

Seems like the 16600 is a good deal then, apart from the modern upgrades 116600 is predicted to be collectible and that’s probably driving the premium plus you have no other option if the SD43 is too big and you want a modern SD.

[HogwldFLTR]

The 116600 was only a three year run and as such is available in limited quantities. This accounts for the higher prices. It also is the last of the SD line with 40 mm case and no cyclops. The modernized bracelet and ceramic bezel insert add to the advancements and value.

[sillo]

What do you prefer aesthetically? Have you been able to try both on?

[MickCollins1916]

If you could try them both on, that would be best, but isn’t always possible. The SD4K is my all-time favorite watch and the glidelock makes it so comfortable.

I recently sold a 16600 and I’m currently on the hunt for another, since I miss it. The fit on that model may not be for everyone, but it was definitely for me. Such a good fit on my wrist with its deep caseback.

I love both, but I would pick the ceramic between them.

[BT1985]

Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR

The 116600 was only a three year run and as such is available in limited quantities. This accounts for the higher prices. It also is the last of the SD line with 40 mm case and no cyclops. The modernized bracelet and ceramic bezel insert add to the advancements and value.

Originally Posted by MickCollins1916

If you could try them both on, that would be best, but isn’t always possible. The SD4K is my all-time favorite watch and the glidelock makes it so comfortable.

I recently sold a 16600 and I’m currently on the hunt for another, since I miss it. The fit on that model may not be for everyone, but it was definitely for me. Such a good fit on my wrist with its deep caseback.

I love both, but I would pick the ceramic between them.

I agree with these comments. It was not only a short three year run but didn’t sell well at the time so is pretty scarce relatively. I have said this on other threads but I truly think it takes the best attributes from a 5 digit and 6 digit Rolex diver while staying true to its heritage.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[sond86]

I like the 16600
But if I had a bigger wrist greater than 7.5” I’d prob opt for the larger

[HogwldFLTR]

Originally Posted by sond86

I like the 16600
But if I had a bigger wrist greater than 7.5” I’d prob opt for the larger

The 116600 isn't larger. The 126600 is the larger one and not in the discussion.

[red1108nyc]

Both pretty cool and I like the 16600 better.

[sond86]

Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR

The 116600 isn't larger. The 126600 is the larger one and not in the discussion.

Ahh ok thanks!

I just watched a video and learned a lot! Didn’t know the differences

[mirror]

I like the 16600 more. If you ask me. I would go for it anytime.
Well that’s my opinion

[bowsersdaddy]

Just recently purchased a 16600.

I took it over the 116600 because the case proportions... 16600 proportions just look better to me. Also the ceramic bezel on the 116600 looked way too flashy for my liking. I got the SD because it is a rugged tool watch. Having a blingy shiny bezel on it makes it look like a piece of jewelry rather than a mechanical piece of hardware. Totally up to you in terms of what you like but for me I much prefer the less flashy bezel on 16600.

My choice is above combined with fact that 116600 prices are high due to scarcity and possible speculation.. i really dont care. Just wanted a beautiful watch that ticks all the boxes and that would more-or-less retain its value so that if/when i resell, i can "reduce the cost of ownership" since i'd only have paid the difference between from what i bought it to when/if i sold it.

Hope this helps you in your decision. At least whichever way you decide, you won't ever be wrong!!! Sea Dweller for life

[sensui]

I really think the 116600 is the best modern diver on Rolex's side personally. The 16600 is a great watch and I'd own one for sure if not for the 16660 (the matte dial). That to me is the real best mix of functionality and a fine vintage mix. I am really thankful Rolex made this watch actually.....made my decision to let go of my 1665 a little easier....the things I have to do to move onto the next great thing....

[037]

Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR

The 116600 isn't larger.

It is by a small amount. The bezel on a 16600 is 39.5mm and the bezel on a 116600 is 40.2mm. The scallop width in each bezel also plays a role in appearance, as do crystal diameters. The 16600 will look slightly smaller on the wrist. It's slight but worth mentioning for completeness.

Having owned both, I would choose the 16600. I enjoyed the 116600 for about 2.5 years but eventually found it to be sterile in comparison to every SD before it.

[JP.]

Check my review of the 16600.

https://luxurywatches635.wordpress.c...dweller-16600/

I've had many, many Rolexes over the last two decades but the Dweller 16600 is the nicest and best looking. 16610 is my 2nd favorite (and I own that too) but because the Dweller is a bit bulkier and sits a bit higher on the wrist, I prefer the 16600.

[returntorolex]

Impressive watches

[Mik8yu]

Originally Posted by sensui

I really think the 116600 is the best modern diver on Rolex's side personally. The 16600 is a great watch and I'd own one for sure if not for the 16660 (the matte dial). That to me is the real best mix of functionality and a fine vintage mix. I am really thankful Rolex made this watch actually.....made my decision to let go of my 1665 a little easier....the things I have to do to move onto the next great thing....

Can’t speak for the 116600 and I am probably heavily biased coming from a smaller wrist. To summarize and it’s my thoughts as well; try on both if you can. The 16600’s thicker caseback kind of props up the watch on wrist. This makes it appears to have more presence than 16610/ 14060m. And afterAll its last of the 5 digit and the proportions are still considered a classic versus the newer maxi case. Chamfers are something some lust after. And an unpolished unworn sample seems to be available at a reasonable price at the current market. That said a 16660 has the best of both worlds (vintage and modern) sapphire crystal and matte dial.

These are all the reasons what drove me to purchase a m serial unpolished 16600 at the same time thinking of letting it go; get a 16660 when price comes off a bit. Don’t know if I will regret letting go of the 16600 since it’s in such good condition; nor can I be certain that 16660 will come off at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mik8yu]

Originally Posted by sensui

I really think the 116600 is the best modern diver on Rolex's side personally. The 16600 is a great watch and I'd own one for sure if not for the 16660 (the matte dial). That to me is the real best mix of functionality and a fine vintage mix. I am really thankful Rolex made this watch actually.....made my decision to let go of my 1665 a little easier....the things I have to do to move onto the next great thing....

Can’t speak for the 116600 and I am probably heavily biased coming from a smaller wrist. To summarize and it’s my thoughts as well; try on both if you can. The 16600’s thicker caseback kind of props up the watch on wrist. This makes it appears to have more presence than 16610/ 14060m. And afterAll its last of the 5 digit and the proportions are still considered a classic versus the newer maxi case. Chamfers are something some lust after. And an unpolished unworn sample seems to be available at a reasonable price at the current market. That said a 16660 has the best of both worlds (vintage and modern) sapphire crystal and matte dial.

These are all the reasons what drove me to purchase a m serial unpolished 16600 at the same time thinking of letting it go; get a 16660 when price comes off a bit. Don’t know if I will regret letting go of the 16600 since it’s in such good condition; nor can I be certain that 16660 will come off at all.

Again this thread needs more photos !!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[harvey]

Originally Posted by red1108nyc

Both pretty cool and I like the 16600 better.

Fred that's a lovely pic.

I agree the 16600 is the better reference.

I didn't like the 116600 enough when it was still in production and certainly wouldn't pay a premium for it.

[lhanddds]

The 16600 might be the best buy in Rolex watches right now.

[lhanddds]

Originally Posted by red1108nyc

Both pretty cool and I like the 16600 better.

The SD4K does look larger. Thanks for posting

[Devildog]

Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR

The 116600 isn't larger. The 126600 is the larger one and not in the discussion.

On paper, no. However the 16600 is noticeably smaller on the wrist (perhaps even more so than the sizes mentioned above indicate).