The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 January 2019, 12:43 PM   #1
El Cascarrabias
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: USA
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 1,006
16610M? Hmm?

It's my understanding that the later 14060's (Submariner) had some subtle changes and the reference was designated 14060M.

What about the 16610 (Sub/date)? Did the latter models include any refinements? I've never heard of a 16610M.
__________________
_________
<=>

You really need to be, not seem to be.

El Cascarrabias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2019, 12:54 PM   #2
Hub6152
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 893
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Cascarrabias View Post
It's my understanding that the later 14060's (Submariner) had some subtle changes and the reference was designated 14060M.



What about the 16610 (Sub/date)? Did the latter models include any refinements? I've never heard of a 16610M.


The 14060 movement changed from the older simple balance cock type 3000 series to the newer balance bridge type 3130, and the M designation stands for “Modified”.
Hub6152 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2019, 12:57 PM   #3
importstunna
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: World
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hub6152 View Post
the M designation stands for “Modified”.
Did not know that!
importstunna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2019, 01:03 PM   #4
Hub6152
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 893
AFAIK the 16610 came with the 3135 (same as the 3130 but with the date) movement from the start so wasn’t modified as such - hence why no 16610M.
Hub6152 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2019, 02:51 PM   #5
Glidelock
"TRF" Member
 
Glidelock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Will Zdorf
Location: So. Cal.
Watch: SDC4000, Sub LVC
Posts: 1,947
A 16610 M, would only be referring to the serial #, and not have anything whatsoever to do with the 3135 movement!
Glidelock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 08:48 AM   #6
El Cascarrabias
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: USA
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hub6152 View Post
AFAIK the 16610 came with the 3135 (same as the 3130 but with the date) movement from the start so wasn’t modified as such - hence why no 16610M.
So, the 3135 did not benefit from any modifications that were added to the 3130?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glidelock View Post
A 16610 M, would only be referring to the serial #, and not have anything whatsoever to do with the 3135 movement!
In what way would it refer to the serial number?

How does the 14060M refer to the serial number?

Just curious . . .

__________________
_________
<=>

You really need to be, not seem to be.

El Cascarrabias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 09:07 AM   #7
Chilly Coconut
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: South
Posts: 558
.
Chilly Coconut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 09:24 AM   #8
Glidelock
"TRF" Member
 
Glidelock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Will Zdorf
Location: So. Cal.
Watch: SDC4000, Sub LVC
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Cascarrabias View Post
So, the 3135 did not benefit from any modifications that were added to the 3130?

In what way would it refer to the serial number?

How does the 14060M refer to the serial number?

Just curious . . .

No, the 3135 movement in the Sub Date model 16610 (or any model containing a 3135 for that matter) did not have any reason to benefit from a modification that was made to an entirely different movement!

Please re-read my post, as I never indicated the M in a 14060M had anything to do with a serial #. However, as pointed out previously, the M on a 14060M stands for Modified...as Rolex made an improvement to the 14060 movement!

You will see many threads over the years though referring to an 16610 M (which have a 3135 movement),but again...that would only be referring to an M serial #, not the 3135 movement!

That said, around the 2008 time frame, you could have purchased an M serial # 14060M as well...which clearly is an 14060M movement on an M serial no date Sub!
Glidelock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 09:37 AM   #9
El Cascarrabias
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: USA
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 1,006
Got it, Will!

__________________
_________
<=>

You really need to be, not seem to be.

El Cascarrabias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 09:38 AM   #10
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Cascarrabias View Post
So, the 3135 did not benefit from any modifications that were added to the 3130?
. . .

No, no, no...…

The Rolex 3000 movement was Modified with a full balance bridge, larger balance and a couple of other minor changes.

All Oyster Perpetuals with the 3000 movement that got the Modified movement, re-numbered 3130, have the M stamped case.

That goes for Air Kings, OP's, and Subs.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 09:39 AM   #11
thesharkfactor
"TRF" Member
 
thesharkfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
I have always wondered why the non date sub starts with 14.. why not 16 like the rest of the tool range?
thesharkfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 10:51 AM   #12
Hub6152
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 893
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesharkfactor View Post
I have always wondered why the non date sub starts with 14.. why not 16 like the rest of the tool range?


The refs with 16 all have a date. Refs with 14 don’t.
Hub6152 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 12:17 PM   #13
Amochosto
"TRF" Member
 
Amochosto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Me
Posts: 1,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hub6152 View Post
The refs with 16 all have a date. Refs with 14 don’t.
I thought the same but my 116500 disagrees with this.
__________________
1771036

Stupidity is doomed, therefore, to cringe at every syllable of wisdom

Heraclitus of Ephesus
Amochosto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 12:32 PM   #14
Brazicano
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Georgia
Watch: 126710blnr
Posts: 108
There is a 16610T
Brazicano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 12:35 PM   #15
Brazicano
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Georgia
Watch: 126710blnr
Posts: 108
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=184161
Brazicano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 12:41 PM   #16
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brazicano View Post
There is a 16610T
It's not a 16610T. It is a 16610 and the T is a separate stamp.

The T (for Trou) is stamped on all cases that had pierced lug holes, then changed to the non-pierced lugs without releasing a new model.

You will find the T on most of the cases and models in the line until they changed model numbers, such as to the 116610. You must use the later modified bracelet end-links on the T stamped cases or you will not get your bracelet back off.

The 14060/M never got the non-pierced lugs so there are no 14060/M cases stamped with a T.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 12:42 PM   #17
Hub6152
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 893
16610M? Hmm?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amochosto View Post
I thought the same but my 116500 disagrees with this.

In terms of Submariners or non Chronograph sports.
Hub6152 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.