The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 February 2019, 05:58 AM   #1
007_Omega
"TRF" Member
 
007_Omega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Galaxy
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 905
Wrist Size: We've been doing this wrong?

Just did a quick experiment as people always go on and on about wrist size, yet sometimes we see people with smaller or larger wrists pulling off a watch worse or better than their wrist size.

As I suspected, wrist circumference is the wrong measurement. I have a 6.5 inch wrist but my wrist real estate (diameter across the top of my wrist where a watch would actually sit without extending off my wrist) is 53mm. I knew I had a flat wrist but I guess this pretty much cements that.

Just measure yourself and then compare the lug-to-lug length of the watch to see if the watch would extend off your wrist. Also, you can measure solid end link to solid end link for a more accurate measure as well as the modern Rolex models wear bigger due to the SELs.

Hope that helps. It's not an exact science as your overall body is going to play a big part in how a watch looks on you but in general I think this works better than just stating your wrist size and arbitrarily determining whether you have a flat or rounded wrist. Generally, the lower body fat %=flatter wrists.
007_Omega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 06:01 AM   #2
WatchNutcase
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: UK / EU & Canada
Watch: Sub 114060
Posts: 1,349
This is a great idea and I totally agree. As someone who suffers from tiny wrists I'll make sure to try out this tip
WatchNutcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 06:03 AM   #3
awol123
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: US
Posts: 111
I agree. Also, how much does wrist size change with weight and aging?
awol123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 06:04 AM   #4
Jmbarrack
"TRF" Member
 
Jmbarrack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Watch: Ever changing!
Posts: 1,150
This is great advice. I have a 6.75 inch wrist and I know my limits in terms of watch sizes. But I agree, the first thing I look at is the lug to lug or end link to end link measurement. That's what takes up the real estate on the wrist.

47.5 lug to lug is my ideal measurement.

Solid end links are really the tricky part. They can take a 48mm lug to lug measurement and make the actual measurement 52mm.

This is why I chose the 14060 over the 16610. It has hollow endlinks and the true measurement is actually lug-to-lug.
Jmbarrack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 06:06 AM   #5
polaris72
2024 Pledge Member
 
polaris72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: U.S./Vienna, AT
Posts: 1,967
I have been saying this over and over, it’s the shape, not just the wrist circumference.
polaris72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 06:21 AM   #6
R G
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by 007_Omega View Post
Just did a quick experiment as people always go on and on about wrist size, yet sometimes we see people with smaller or larger wrists pulling off a watch worse or better than their wrist size.

As I suspected, wrist circumference is the wrong measurement. I have a 6.5 inch wrist but my wrist real estate (diameter across the top of my wrist where a watch would actually sit without extending off my wrist) is 53mm. I knew I had a flat wrist but I guess this pretty much cements that.

Just measure yourself and then compare the lug-to-lug length of the watch to see if the watch would extend off your wrist. Also, you can measure solid end link to solid end link for a more accurate measure as well as the modern Rolex models wear bigger due to the SELs.

Hope that helps. It's not an exact science as your overall body is going to play a big part in how a watch looks on you but in general I think this works better than just stating your wrist size and arbitrarily determining whether you have a flat or rounded wrist. Generally, the lower body fat %=flatter wrists.
Loads and loads of ill fitting watches shown on this site. Lots of users claiming their wrist sizes are larger than what is obviously smaller.

Lug to lug is the most important dimension. More so than case diameter.
R G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 06:46 AM   #7
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,598
Pics
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 06:50 AM   #8
Torque Time
"TRF" Member
 
Torque Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Real Name: Archie
Location: Washington, DC
Watch: TT DJ 1601
Posts: 359
I’d also consider the size of you hand...especially if you wear your watch low on your arm and up against your hand.
Torque Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 08:30 AM   #9
AckAck
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: US
Watch: Patek 5204P
Posts: 485
Lugs shouldn’t extend over your wrist. If so the watch is too big for you.
AckAck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 08:42 AM   #10
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torque Time View Post
I’d also consider the size of you hand...especially if you wear your watch low on your arm and up against your hand.
Yes the size of one's hand is also a major factor depending upon how one likes to wear their watch.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 08:46 AM   #11
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by polaris72 View Post
I have been saying this over and over, it’s the shape, not just the wrist circumference.
Yes, but we need to have a width to thickness ratio in order to quantify.
It seems everything else is quantified and measured to the nth degree these days.

Or we could simply go back to assessing wrist pics if in doubt.
But only the ones taken in the mirror. Mirror wrist pics for the best guide
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 08:56 AM   #12
AckAck
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: US
Watch: Patek 5204P
Posts: 485
I’ve seen so many pictures on here of people with watches way too big for their wrists.
AckAck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 09:05 AM   #13
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,015
This also depends on personal preferences. Some people wear a watch above the junction of the ulna and carpal bones.

Others keep it very loose to let it “drape” below that. And this helps them wear a larger watch than otherwise possible given their wrist size/shape.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 09:44 AM   #14
123Blueface
"TRF" Member
 
123Blueface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: USA
Watch: All
Posts: 5,316
Great idea but more simplified, with my 6.5” wrist, I wear whatever makes me smile.
__________________
Rolex 228235 DD40 Olive, 126710BLRO, 116710BLNR, 116613LB, 116500LN White, 126610LN, 116500LN Black, 126610LV, 116610LV, 126334 Blue Diamond
Breitling Navitimer 01, Cartier Santos Large
123Blueface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 10:27 AM   #15
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by AckAck View Post
Lugs shouldn’t extend over your wrist. If so the watch is too big for you.
This is the most important thing regarding fitment. If the lugs are hanging over each side, watch is too big. Of course there are many variations in wrist shape. I'm lucky, have a nice flat spot on my 7.5 inch wrist and any 40mm fits like a glove. However I am partial to Subs.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 10:34 AM   #16
Dr Watches
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigblu10 View Post
This is the most important thing regarding fitment. If the lugs are hanging over each side, watch is too big. Of course there are many variations in wrist shape. I'm lucky, have a nice flat spot on my 7.5 inch wrist and any 40mm fits like a glove. However I am partial to Subs.
Not just lugs. Modern Rolex endlinks stick out beyond the lug tip. I’ve found that if the bracelet drops straight down the sides of my wrist a watch is too large both visually and from a comfort standpoint.
Dr Watches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 10:38 AM   #17
visualplane
"TRF" Member
 
visualplane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York, NY
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,170
Also, the width looks wider when the palm is facing you. When the palm is facing away from you, the wrist becomes more narrow.
visualplane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 10:40 AM   #18
visualplane
"TRF" Member
 
visualplane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York, NY
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,170
This is why most IWC won't work with me, long lugs as well.

visualplane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 11:23 AM   #19
dkg1616
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by polaris72 View Post
I have been saying this over and over, it’s the shape, not just the wrist circumference.
Agree!
dkg1616 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 11:32 AM   #20
subprimero
"TRF" Member
 
subprimero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Texas
Watch: 14060
Posts: 3,434
Very true!
subprimero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2019, 11:39 AM   #21
mfm22
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Mike
Location: NY
Watch: Explorer 1
Posts: 488
Agree. Lug to lug is a key. The shape of lugs matter as well if lugs curve downward like a Seiko Sumo a 44" case still fits a smaller wrist

Another factor that is Seldom mentioned is body size I have a 6 7/8 wrist plus or minus depending on temps
A 36mm to 40mm will work if lugs are under 50mm. But that said a 36" looks too small on my 6'1" 220lb frame
mfm22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.