The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 March 2019, 03:00 AM   #1
deansot53
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 260
Explorer 1 declined

I had the opportunity to purchase an Explorer 1 today and decided to not buy it.
It could have been added to my collection of a Bluesy etc however seeing it and trying on it was very underwhelming in my view. A great entry level professional model but not for me so I will move on.
deansot53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 03:02 AM   #2
NWNL
"TRF" Member
 
NWNL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 228235 ROMAN WHITE
Posts: 243
I saw one available in our local AD. Liked it but didn't love it.
NWNL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 03:09 AM   #3
Vamp
"TRF" Member
 
Vamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: States
Watch: and learn!
Posts: 733
Gotta buy what you like that’s for sure. But the Explorer is without a doubt one of Rolex’s most iconic watches. Simple yes, but also elegant and like you said “sporty”. Its a watch guys watch and flys way under the radar..
__________________
Instagram: vampin_
126720BLRO
116710LN
126600
215670
Vamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 03:14 AM   #4
carlhaluss
"TRF" Member
 
carlhaluss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Carl
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Watch: Rolex Explorer 1
Posts: 1,780
It is a wonderful watch, but you were right not to get it just because it is available. If it is not what you really want. I bought mine a few months ago, as I wanted it to replace the previous 36mm model that I regret selling. While the new one is a wonderful watch, it simply doesn't replace my old one.

Anyway, as you say, move on and find one that you really like. I got my first Sub the other day, a 114060, and it will likely get way more wrist time than my Explorer 1.

Happy hunting for your next watch!

Cheers,
Carl
__________________
Those who possess a sense of entitlement are seldom satisfied.
carlhaluss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 03:17 AM   #5
JayHantz
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
JayHantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Texas
Watch: @Escapementt
Posts: 9,844
Buy what you like and not because of the hype. Hopefully it will go to an enthusiast!
JayHantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 03:30 AM   #6
Frits1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: N/A
Posts: 600
The Exp1 might be a bit underwhelming/boring at first glance. The Exp1 needs time to grow. Its my 10th Rolex and Always overlooked it because i thought it was to generic had no place in a large collection. Now its my favorite Rolex watch. Again you realy need to wear it for a couple of weeks to understand its beauty.
Frits1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 03:36 AM   #7
jon_jon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,350
Explorer 1 is an understated Rolex and overlooked by many. But you definitely have to buy a watch because you love it.

I have been offered "popular" watches like BLNR and Green Sub at ADs and passed on them because I did not love them. I felt it was better to leave them for others to buy and enjoy!
jon_jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 03:37 AM   #8
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
My 114270 is a dream watch in my humble judgement.

I did try on the 214270 when it first came out and although I liked it, I still prefer my 114270.

__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 05:55 AM   #9
Fat_ninja
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: USA
Watch: P-01
Posts: 11,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
My 114270 is a dream watch in my humble judgement.

I did try on the 214270 when it first came out and although I liked it, I still prefer my 114270.

Isnt the only difference the hands? And maybe the black is matte?
Fat_ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 05:57 AM   #10
Crown & Shield
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: The Alps
Posts: 591
There is no such thing as an Explorer 1
Crown & Shield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 06:21 AM   #11
Colin G
"TRF" Member
 
Colin G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Canada
Watch: 216570, 214270
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown & Shield View Post
There is no such thing as an Explorer 1
Maybe that is why the OP passed on it? It does not exist. Lol.

Colin G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 06:40 AM   #12
nigelUK
"TRF" Member
 
nigelUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northants, UK
Posts: 1,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown & Shield View Post
There is no such thing as an Explorer 1
..this is new thread material
__________________
insta : NigelUK
nigelUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 06:48 AM   #13
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown & Shield View Post
There is no such thing as an Explorer 1
The Explorer 3 has GMT and split seconds chronograph functions....
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 08:11 AM   #14
Colin G
"TRF" Member
 
Colin G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Canada
Watch: 216570, 214270
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by 904VT View Post
The Explorer 3 has GMT and split seconds chronograph functions....
I'm holding out for the EXP IV.
Colin G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 06:01 AM   #15
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat_ninja View Post
Isnt the only difference the hands? And maybe the black is matte?
I'm not sure what you mean, but the 114270 is 36mm and the 214270 is 39mm, with there being some variation in hand length on the 214270. There may be a difference in the dials, but I'm not sure.

I could be mistaken, though.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 06:06 AM   #16
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
I'm not sure what you mean, but the 114270 is 36mm and the 214270 is 39mm, with there being some variation in hand length on the 214270. There may be a difference in the dials, but I'm not sure.

I could be mistaken, though.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
i see the vintage 36mm explorers at burlington arcade a lot. I do have to say they look much nicer to my eye than the newer versions. Still not comfortable with a watch that size on me, but they do look better for sure. Not sure why, but they do.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 06:58 AM   #17
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
i see the vintage 36mm explorers at burlington arcade a lot. I do have to say they look much nicer to my eye than the newer versions. Still not comfortable with a watch that size on me, but they do look better for sure. Not sure why, but they do.
Proportionality.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 06:22 AM   #18
blufinz52
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
blufinz52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: NH
Watch: 116400GV 124060
Posts: 1,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
I'm not sure what you mean, but the 114270 is 36mm and the 214270 is 39mm, with there being some variation in hand length on the 214270. There may be a difference in the dials, but I'm not sure.

I could be mistaken, though.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
The 214270 comes in 2 dials, Mk1 has no lume on the 3, 6, 9, while the Mk2 does have lume on the numbers
blufinz52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 07:48 AM   #19
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by blufinz52 View Post
The 214270 comes in 2 dials, Mk1 has no lume on the 3, 6, 9, while the Mk2 does have lume on the numbers


Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 08:19 AM   #20
Fat_ninja
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: USA
Watch: P-01
Posts: 11,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
I'm not sure what you mean, but the 114270 is 36mm and the 214270 is 39mm, with there being some variation in hand length on the 214270. There may be a difference in the dials, but I'm not sure.

I could be mistaken, though.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Oh my mistake. For somee reason i thought it was 39mm.


Thanks for clarifying. :)
Fat_ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 08:53 AM   #21
F83
"TRF" Member
 
F83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Seattle
Posts: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat_ninja View Post
Isnt the only difference the hands? And maybe the black is matte?
That's a damn nice watch. I don't have one yet but I do plan to add one. I suspect it will get a lot of wrist time.
F83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 05:33 AM   #22
Soarer
"TRF" Member
 
Soarer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Albert
Location: Toronto
Watch: Submariner LV
Posts: 1,083
Well, the next person who gets to pick it up is gonna thank you! So long.
__________________
What you gotta do, you gotta do!
Soarer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 05:45 AM   #23
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
i like it on OF that looks awesome, i would pass the oficiall version too. If it came on rubber from the factory, i would be all over it.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 05:52 AM   #24
Brew
"TRF" Member
 
Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Larry
Location: Finger Lakes
Posts: 6,007
I tried one on a couple of weekends ago. Great watch, but my OP39 has all the same bases covered, for the most part. So I too passed.
Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 05:57 AM   #25
Finslayer83
"TRF" Member
 
Finslayer83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
Did the same this weekend.

Even was stoked about it being a birthday present.

I think its flashier than my 14060M which was unexpected, hoped it would be more under the radar.
Finslayer83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 06:03 AM   #26
Juan Luis
2024 Pledge Member
 
Juan Luis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Juan Luis
Location: Dominican Rep.
Watch: Undecided
Posts: 1,368
That's one Rolex that in my opinion, looks great on a NATO strap. Or any other strap for that matter. The Explorer II (40mm version), as well for me.
Juan Luis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 06:04 AM   #27
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
There's no decline, its just postpone!
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 06:05 AM   #28
peterpl
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
Does absolutely nothing for me. Explorer II polar dial on the other hand is very very nice.
peterpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 06:27 AM   #29
Jerrocop
2024 Pledge Member
 
Jerrocop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: West Coast
Watch: EXP 39, GRNR, SeaQ
Posts: 961
Quote:
Originally Posted by deansot53 View Post
I had the opportunity to purchase an Explorer 1 today and decided to not buy it.
It could have been added to my collection of a Bluesy etc however seeing it and trying on it was very underwhelming in my view. A great entry level professional model but not for me so I will move on.
Entry level?
Jerrocop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2019, 06:58 AM   #30
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerrocop View Post
Entry level?


There's no such thing.



Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.