ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 May 2019, 07:37 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London
Posts: 117
|
16610 LV - which is the better buy?
Hi
I’m looking to get a 16610LV - I just prefer the bezel colour to the flat green on the new version. There are 2 I am looking at - one is NOS and the other has been worn but recently serviced and has new bezel and glass. They are pretty much the same price and I’ll be buying to wear rather than store. Is the pre-owned a better buy? I like the idea of new but i assume it will need a service to reseal etc and as soon as I’ve worn it it loses the NOS cachet anyway? Btw, the NOS is 2008 and the used is 2011. Does that make a difference? Thanks |
26 May 2019, 07:44 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
|
If you buy to wear - and the NOS is pretty much the same price as the used one - why not buy the NOS then?
|
26 May 2019, 07:48 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London
Posts: 117
|
Just wondering if I’ll need to service it right away?
|
26 May 2019, 07:59 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: East
Watch: ...
Posts: 1,171
|
I’d much prefer the NOS. The fact that the other one has has new glass and bezel suggests it’s had some trauma? Tho RSC would make it new again. At similar price NOS seems a better deal and may not need a service immediately unless you actually want to dive with it. NOS, great find imo
__________________
Yacht-Master 126622, GMT-Master II 16710, Submariner 114060, Sea-Dweller 16600, Panerai Luminor PAM111 Lange Saxonia Moon Phase 384.029, Tudor Black Bay Harrods M79230G. |
26 May 2019, 08:26 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,263
|
Quote:
|
|
26 May 2019, 08:58 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,089
|
NOS by a mile if they are comparable price. You won't need to service anything.
|
26 May 2019, 09:21 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
|
|
26 May 2019, 09:48 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,764
|
If the price is similar then the NOS. Have it pressure tested and put on the timer and make a decision on service based on the results.
|
26 May 2019, 09:56 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Watch: explorer
Posts: 2,291
|
NOS all day at similar pricing. Plus what’s another $800 at this point, if it did need to be serviced.
|
26 May 2019, 09:57 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,263
|
|
26 May 2019, 09:59 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,263
|
Quote:
At least if you want to have any faith in them beyond working for today/this week/month etc. It’s a pretty big risk to rely on ten year seals. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
26 May 2019, 10:19 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
|
Of course NOS if the price is close. However I wouldn’t pay crazy money for NOS if I fouled find another example used and better priced.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
26 May 2019, 10:31 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,263
|
I’m not sure how big a risk it is but I was told it’s a risk. I’ve got a sub with seals of unknown age. I had it pressure tested and wore it in the shower and it was ok. But for how long, who knows..?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.