ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 September 2019, 02:56 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Ian
Location: Hamburg
Watch: Sub 14060
Posts: 1,161
|
When is a Rolex considered "vintage"?
I´m new here, so sorry if this silly question has been asked before! I would be interested to know when a Rolex can be considered "vintage". I have a 1996 14060 Sub I bought new, my daily watch all these years, and personally I just think of it as an older model. But opinions seem to vary, so thanks for any enlightenment! Here's my only, treasured Rolex, been all round the world with me...
IMG_1725a.jpg |
18 September 2019, 03:01 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 1,420
|
That’s a beautiful piece.
I would guess with Rolex, somewhere between 25-30 years to be vintage. |
18 September 2019, 03:04 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,745
|
plexiglass crystal imho
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
18 September 2019, 03:04 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,212
|
When is a Rolex considered "vintage"?
Hmmm....2003LV
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
18 September 2019, 03:23 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Ian
Location: Hamburg
Watch: Sub 14060
Posts: 1,161
|
|
18 September 2019, 03:35 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New York
Watch: 16660, 116660
Posts: 139
|
There isn't one consistent definition of "vintage"-- the strictest definition I've heard is 4-digit reference only (and therefore defined as a fixed quantity), with more lenient definitions ranging to watches manufactured a certain number of years before present, for example, "at least 25 years old" (and the quantity would therefore increase every year). I generally go with "I know it when I see it."
|
18 September 2019, 03:44 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 126333
Posts: 10,664
|
When your name comes up on the wait list
|
18 September 2019, 03:49 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,959
|
The moment you’re told that the watch you’re wearing is “an old man’s watch”.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
18 September 2019, 04:02 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Around
Posts: 1,124
|
Anything which can be proven to be manufactured pre 8.17:44pm Tuesday 17 September 1991. Anything post 8.17:45pm is neo vintage up to and including 9.27:31am 18 February 2003. And then everything since is post vintage modern
__________________
That's what watches are for; not just for recording the time; but our own travel through that time. - Explorer Steve |
18 September 2019, 04:20 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,660
|
|
18 September 2019, 06:24 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Real Name: Ben
Location: Utah
Watch: Sub date
Posts: 157
|
|
18 September 2019, 06:39 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,444
|
Like a Supreme Court Justice, I know it when I see it.
|
18 September 2019, 06:50 AM | #13 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,309
|
Quote:
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
18 September 2019, 06:56 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy EU
Watch: Rolex Panerai
Posts: 7,499
|
|
18 September 2019, 06:56 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,764
|
So how old does a watch have to be to vintage? Would a 16800 (5 digit with sapphire crystal) from 1984 classify as such?
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex. Ian Fleming |
18 September 2019, 07:31 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northants, UK
Posts: 1,058
|
Quote:
its a transitional piece and classic (with WG surrounds), but not vintage ... again imho
__________________
insta : NigelUK |
|
18 September 2019, 07:47 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
There is no single consistent line where one side is vintage and one side isn't.
If you want to call it vintage go ahead. Some will agree, some won't. |
18 September 2019, 10:28 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Australia
Watch: YachtMaster 116621
Posts: 290
|
After your Rolex gets its first scratch
|
18 September 2019, 11:03 AM | #19 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2019
Location: AWOL
Watch: Submariner 16803
Posts: 487
|
Quote:
|
|
18 September 2019, 12:16 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Around
Posts: 1,124
|
Please refer to the ‘official’ timeline I posted above
__________________
That's what watches are for; not just for recording the time; but our own travel through that time. - Explorer Steve |
18 September 2019, 03:10 PM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
|
This topic is so old it's now vintage.
This joke is newer but it's a classic. |
18 September 2019, 03:15 PM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2019
Location: AWOL
Watch: Submariner 16803
Posts: 487
|
|
18 September 2019, 05:02 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex 1665
Posts: 295
|
We need a sticky for new members and links to all these topics that get re-posted almost daily!!
|
18 September 2019, 09:53 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Collin
Location: Raleigh, NC
Watch: 16014, 16600
Posts: 344
|
|
18 September 2019, 10:22 PM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,510
|
When you buy it new and you are 71 years old?
__________________
E |
19 September 2019, 01:18 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
It’s kind of fun how people bought modern watches and when they are just old new watches they want to call them vintage. I think very few people buy a 16610 today and consider it being a vintage watch.
Don’t really understand why it is even a question. It’s not like things get worth more just because someone considers it being a vintage watch.
__________________
Instagram: @perj123 |
19 September 2019, 02:03 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,174
|
When does a joke become vintage...I like that especially in the context of this over asked and annoying question.
Everyone has their own barometer as to what vintage is and there is absolutely no consensus. I personally feel that 5 digit and earlier are vintage, but some (many) people do not agree with that and contend the 4 digits are vintage, c'est la vie, it does not matter anyway. |
19 September 2019, 02:15 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,859
|
if you have to ask the question it probably isn't
In my book 3 of the following 4 make vintage: plexi, lug holes, tritium and matt dial
__________________
1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013 Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016 16234 |
19 September 2019, 02:28 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 20
|
Personally, I'd say as soon as it's discontinued
|
19 September 2019, 04:09 AM | #30 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,454
|
My oldest Rolex is 11 years old and I have three others that are newer, the last one having been bought in 2014.
They have been superceded in the line-up, so I guess they can be called vintage in one sense, but not necessarily antique. I have three other Rolex watches that were produced between ca. 1971 and ca. 1989. I definitely consider those to be vintage, and were already at least 30 years old when I bought them, which I think qualifies them as antiques. I don't really consider the newer ones to be vintage, though, even if some might. Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.