The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 November 2019, 01:10 AM   #1
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,514
New 126710BLNR Another great 3285 mainspring test. 72 hours and 40 minutes.

Just wanted to report another great mainspring/power reserve test. I do this with all my watches once a year. New watches I run them for about a month and then test the mainspring. My new 126710BLNR has tested the highest (longest) power reserve of all my new Rolex movement testing the last few years. 72 hours and 40 minutes.. Accuracy along the test was also impressive for a Rolex movement holding 0 second accuracy 48 hours into the power reserve testing. At 70 hours into the power reserve, the movement lost 5 seconds total which is pretty good for a single barrel mainspring. Amplitude had to be really falling off at that point.

As a reference of some of the other new Rolex movements I have tested.
Rolex DSSD JC 126660 movement 3235 total:h70:05
Rolex SD43 126600 movement 3235 total: h70:23
Rolex CHNR 126711CHNR movement 3285 total: h71:44

To do this simple test: Wind the watch fully and set the time to a atomic clock. Set the watch down to where you can see the time but not have to touch the watch. Keep track of the watch daily until it stops. This will give you a mainspring check-up and reference point. Notice where in the power reserve you start to see the accuracy start to fall off.
Why this matters:
Now if you drop or notice issues with your watch, you can do this test again and compare if you may have any mainspring damage. If all of a sudden you are getting 17 hours power reserve, you know your mainspring has broken. Think of it as a EKG of your watch.

Here is a example of testing notes of a CHNR:
Power Reserve Test 11/14/18. Total 71:44 power reserve
11/14/18 wound full +1.0 @ 10:33pm 3UP]
11/15/18 +1.0@ 9am. +1.0@ 9pm
11/16/18 +0.0@ 9am. -2.5@ 8pm
11/17/18 -8.0@ 9:30am. -30.0@ 9:20pm. Stopped 10:17pm
Total 71:44


Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 01:14 AM   #2
Spartacus
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: DC
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 2,745
Very cool. Thanks for sharing!
Spartacus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 01:35 AM   #3
subdateII
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 161
Interesting! Thank you. Did you test Omega watches (or others) with double barrel mainsprings?
subdateII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 01:55 AM   #4
watchmework
"TRF" Member
 
watchmework's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
Honestly, I got distracted in reading your post by the incredible photo

Thanks for sharing mystro!
watchmework is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 02:00 AM   #5
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by subdateII View Post
Interesting! Thank you. Did you test Omega watched (or others) with double barrel mainsprings?

Absolutely. I am a automatic movement fan of all brands. I have a few of the latest top movements from Omega, Panera, etc....
Without exception double mainsprings hold a stronger amplitude throughout their duration. For example my Pam 661 Carbotech with the new in-house 9010 movement with double barrel mainsprings tested to a unbelievable 80 hour and 15 minutes. It also holds its accuracy almost completely through its power reserve. This is due to a stronger amplitude and the way the power is more evenly distributed with the double barrel mainspring design. Omega’s new 9900 master chronometer movement is the most accurate automatic movement I have ever tested in a mainspring test.
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 02:53 AM   #6
CortlandtPT
"TRF" Member
 
CortlandtPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: New York
Watch: all of 'em :))
Posts: 232
Thanks for the informative post.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CortlandtPT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 03:21 AM   #7
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,761
Impressive results. Your pictures are always amazing
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 03:55 AM   #8
exador
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,600
That’s some serious watch nerdery
exador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 03:58 AM   #9
Eatapp
"TRF" Member
 
Eatapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: 114300 Blue
Posts: 480
Awesome! Thanks for sharing.
Eatapp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 04:00 AM   #10
Chiboy
"TRF" Member
 
Chiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,572
I can't believe no one has mentioned how many seconds there are in 72 hours!

Just kidding! I like this stuff, although I've never run such a test.
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016)
Chiboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 04:21 AM   #11
abelxo
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Gerald Genta
Location: UK
Posts: 165
How do you know when it is fully wound? Cool test though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
abelxo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 04:24 AM   #12
Seibei
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,630
At what altitude was your watch tested?
Seibei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 04:31 AM   #13
drmizzou
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Enthusiast!
Location: Midwest
Watch: Collector!
Posts: 1,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by abelxo View Post
How do you know when it is fully wound? Cool test though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks for the informative post OP! I second the quoted question. I don’t have a watch winder and wear my watches in rotation such that every time I pick up a watch to put on, I have to wind it. Usually I just wind turn the crown 15 or 20 times then set the date/time and go! Haven’t really continued to wind it until it stops but presume that’s when the mainspring is fully wound?
__________________
HULK
BLNR
YG Daytona 116515
Pepsi GMT 126710BLRO
White DaytonaC 116500
Omega Seamaster 50th Anniv Bond OHMSS
Omega Seamaster Bond titanium
drmizzou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 04:44 AM   #14
EndlessEight
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
EndlessEight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: NJ, USA
Watch: Hulk, BLRO
Posts: 1,644
Thank you Mystro.

I’ve found my SD43 is incredibly accurate.
EndlessEight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 05:58 AM   #15
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by abelxo View Post
How do you know when it is fully wound? Cool test though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
First, you can’t over wind a Rolex or any quality automatics. There is a clutch system that will slip when it’s fully wound. Every watch has its own clutch slip sound when it’s slipping. I recommend winding the crown 50 times with a running watch and 70 times with a stopped watch to make sure it’s fully wound before doing the power reserve test.

Warning WIS content:: when fully wound, you will hear a slight “tick click, tick click” from a Rolex when the clutch is slipping inside the mainspring housing while you are winding. You also will feel it ever so slightly through the crown. It will feel kinda gritty at the top of a mainspring wind as the clutch slips.

Warning extra WIS content:
With the new 32 series movements, Rolex went a different way than other manufactures and modded their existing single barrel main spring with a thinner and longer mainspring to get its power reserve up to 70+ hours. Most other manufactures use a double barrel mainspring to achieve this but Rolex likes to do its own thing regardless if its not as efficient. This is Rolex being Rolex. Because of the extra long mainsprings, some Rolex owners say winding the new movements feel gritty. This is partially true if they are winding at the top end of the mainspring near the clutch slipping point. A new 32 series movement will wind smooth as glass from a stopped position 70% up though its winding. The last 30% feels a bit gritty. This is Rolex fitting a unusually long and thin mainspring in a small single housing. Rolex also used a more efficient escapement to work with the new mainspring to get a 70+ hr power reserve. Better shock absorbing system and ceramic rotor bearings were also long over due and thank goodness Rolex adopted them like every other premium movements.
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 05:34 PM   #16
maxbelg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Belgium
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
........and ceramic rotor bearings....
Where did you hear/ read this? I haven‘t encountered this information anywhere.
maxbelg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 05:44 PM   #17
abelxo
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Gerald Genta
Location: UK
Posts: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
First, you can’t over wind a Rolex or any quality automatics. There is a clutch system that will slip when it’s fully wound. Every watch has its own clutch slip sound when it’s slipping. I recommend winding the crown 50 times with a running watch and 70 times with a stopped watch to make sure it’s fully wound before doing the power reserve test.

Warning WIS content:: when fully wound, you will hear a slight “tick click, tick click” from a Rolex when the clutch is slipping inside the mainspring housing while you are winding. You also will feel it ever so slightly through the crown. It will feel kinda gritty at the top of a mainspring wind as the clutch slips.

Warning extra WIS content:
With the new 32 series movements, Rolex went a different way than other manufactures and modded their existing single barrel main spring with a thinner and longer mainspring to get its power reserve up to 70+ hours. Most other manufactures use a double barrel mainspring to achieve this but Rolex likes to do its own thing regardless if its not as efficient. This is Rolex being Rolex. Because of the extra long mainsprings, some Rolex owners say winding the new movements feel gritty. This is partially true if they are winding at the top end of the mainspring near the clutch slipping point. A new 32 series movement will wind smooth as glass from a stopped position 70% up though its winding. The last 30% feels a bit gritty. This is Rolex fitting a unusually long and thin mainspring in a small single housing. Rolex also used a more efficient escapement to work with the new mainspring to get a 70+ hr power reserve. Better shock absorbing system and ceramic rotor bearings were also long over due and thank goodness Rolex adopted them like every other premium movements.


Thank you for a very detailed and interesting answer. I’m excited to try this myself on my Rolex watches and see how long they can hold. NANNANANA BATMAN


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
abelxo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 06:42 PM   #18
Rolexxus
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Cali
Posts: 47
Thanks!
Rolexxus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 07:11 PM   #19
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxbelg View Post
Where did you hear/ read this? I haven‘t encountered this information anywhere.
This question was asked back in January and the answer was no, the rotor does not have ceramic bearings.

Has this changed since then Bas?
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 09:13 PM   #20
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
First, you can’t over wind a Rolex or any quality automatics. There is a clutch system that will slip when it’s fully wound. Every watch has its own clutch slip sound when it’s slipping. I recommend winding the crown 50 times with a running watch and 70 times with a stopped watch to make sure it’s fully wound before doing the power reserve test.

Warning WIS content:: when fully wound, you will hear a slight “tick click, tick click” from a Rolex when the clutch is slipping inside the mainspring housing while you are winding. You also will feel it ever so slightly through the crown. It will feel kinda gritty at the top of a mainspring wind as the clutch slips.

Warning extra WIS content:
With the new 32 series movements, Rolex went a different way than other manufactures and modded their existing single barrel main spring with a thinner and longer mainspring to get its power reserve up to 70+ hours. Most other manufactures use a double barrel mainspring to achieve this but Rolex likes to do its own thing regardless if its not as efficient. This is Rolex being Rolex. Because of the extra long mainsprings, some Rolex owners say winding the new movements feel gritty. This is partially true if they are winding at the top end of the mainspring near the clutch slipping point. A new 32 series movement will wind smooth as glass from a stopped position 70% up though its winding. The last 30% feels a bit gritty. This is Rolex fitting a unusually long and thin mainspring in a small single housing. Rolex also used a more efficient escapement to work with the new mainspring to get a 70+ hr power reserve. Better shock absorbing system and ceramic rotor bearings were also long over due and thank goodness Rolex adopted them like every other premium movements.
The spring-barrel is made much thinner in the 32 series over the 31 series to accommodate the longer mainspring, and there is no clutch in the spring-barrel, all that happens when fully wound it just slips in the spring-barrel.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 09:23 PM   #21
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
This question was asked back in January and the answer was no, the rotor does not have ceramic bearings.

Has this changed since then Bas?
The rotor does use ceramic bearings they are sealed in a lubricated enclosure and according to Rolex should last a life time. And doubtful if Rotor will need changing like the old sleeve post rotor.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 09:29 PM   #22
mountainjogger
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,675
Very interesting. Thanks.
__________________
The King of Cool.
mountainjogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2019, 09:34 PM   #23
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
The rotor does use ceramic bearings they are sealed in a lubricated enclosure and according to Rolex should last a life time. And doubtful if Rotor will need changing like the old sleeve post rotor.
Thank for clarifying Peter
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2019, 06:38 AM   #24
othertbone
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Florida, USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/Vin Omega
Posts: 1,972
Batgirl's do have longer stamina
othertbone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2019, 08:48 AM   #25
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
The spring-barrel is made much thinner in the 32 series over the 31 series to accommodate the longer mainspring, and there is no clutch in the spring-barrel, all that happens when fully wound it just slips in the spring-barrel.
. You are absolutely right. Thanks for clarifying this. I use the term “clutch” to simplify what it does to hit the point that no damage can occur from over winding.
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2019, 09:18 AM   #26
SeikoBake
"TRF" Member
 
SeikoBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: location,location
Watch: AP 15500
Posts: 283
Thanks for sharing; good info
SeikoBake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2019, 05:13 PM   #27
maxbelg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Belgium
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
The rotor does use ceramic bearings they are sealed in a lubricated enclosure and according to Rolex should last a life time. And doubtful if Rotor will need changing like the old sleeve post rotor.
Wow, that's great info, thanks! Do the Sky Dweller and Daytona also use ceramic bearings then?
maxbelg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2019, 05:34 PM   #28
1SG MTB
"TRF" Member
 
1SG MTB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: London, England
Posts: 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
Just wanted to report another great mainspring/power reserve test. I do this with all my watches once a year. New watches I run them for about a month and then test the mainspring. My new 126710BLNR has tested the highest (longest) power reserve of all my new Rolex movement testing the last few years. 72 hours and 40 minutes.. Accuracy along the test was also impressive for a Rolex movement holding 0 second accuracy 48 hours into the power reserve testing. At 70 hours into the power reserve, the movement lost 5 seconds total which is pretty good for a single barrel mainspring. Amplitude had to be really falling off at that point.

As a reference of some of the other new Rolex movements I have tested.
Rolex DSSD JC 126660 movement 3235 total:h70:05
Rolex SD43 126600 movement 3235 total: h70:23
Rolex CHNR 126711CHNR movement 3285 total: h71:44

To do this simple test: Wind the watch fully and set the time to a atomic clock. Set the watch down to where you can see the time but not have to touch the watch. Keep track of the watch daily until it stops. This will give you a mainspring check-up and reference point. Notice where in the power reserve you start to see the accuracy start to fall off.
Why this matters:
Now if you drop or notice issues with your watch, you can do this test again and compare if you may have any mainspring damage. If all of a sudden you are getting 17 hours power reserve, you know your mainspring has broken. Think of it as a EKG of your watch.

Here is a example of testing notes of a CHNR:
Power Reserve Test 11/14/18. Total 71:44 power reserve
11/14/18 wound full +1.0 @ 10:33pm 3UP]
11/15/18 +1.0@ 9am. +1.0@ 9pm
11/16/18 +0.0@ 9am. -2.5@ 8pm
11/17/18 -8.0@ 9:30am. -30.0@ 9:20pm. Stopped 10:17pm
Total 71:44


Great info, thanks for sharing. A few years ago my 5 digit Coke had this issue, I wore the watch 24/7 minus workouts and showers but if I had a really solid night of sleep (no tossing and turning) it would die in the middle of the night. Eventually got tired of winding and resetting the watch so got it serviced and it’s been like new ever since. Now I’ll do this test with all my watches to make sure I catch it earlier!
1SG MTB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2019, 10:20 PM   #29
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
Awesome thread Mystro .. Thank you
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2019, 10:38 PM   #30
amh
"TRF" Member
 
amh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: Various
Posts: 5,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmework View Post
Honestly, I got distracted in reading your post by the incredible photo

Thanks for sharing mystro!
Same - wow! Don't know how anyone can hate on the new model, it's beautiful
amh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.