The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 December 2019, 07:26 AM   #1
cerendigit
"TRF" Member
 
cerendigit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Seattle
Watch: f91w
Posts: 1,078
“Inherent value” of precious metals?

In the world of watches I sometimes hear things such as:

“I would never pay such a markup for a steel watch, I’d rather add a bit more and get something made of gold”

“Id rather save up and get the blue dial Pepsi. Because it’s made of gold”

“.... People didn’t feel like spending that much money on a watch that is not made of precious metal .... “

I don’t share these opinions, but maybe I’m missing something.

Do you think that a watch made of gold is “better” (all else being equal of course) and thus justifies a higher price. Whereas a high price for a steel price is “not justified”? If so why?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
cerendigit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 07:34 AM   #2
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
All metals are made of atoms, just rearranged differently. Humans assigned values to each metal. Objectively one does not cost more than another: humans long ago decided which metals they value more. If you value steel more than gold, great. Now you have to convince the rest of civilization to go along with you.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 07:36 AM   #3
Zakalwe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Sal
Location: London
Posts: 2,496
It’s all about how it makes you feel.

Apply logic vigorously enough to this topic and you end up concluding, absolutely correctly, that spending more than a few hundred bucks on a wrist-mounted time-keeping device is not rational period, regardless of what it’s made.
__________________
“Never argue with idiots. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." - Mark Twain
Zakalwe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 07:55 AM   #4
tadbart
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Ken
Location: Snowbirdville
Watch: 14060
Posts: 301
The Plat:Gold ratio would indicate that a gold Daytona should cost more than a Platona.

We all know that's not the case. And I don' think it's strictly because platinum is nore difficult to work, than its yellow, more malleable counterpart.
tadbart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 07:58 AM   #5
Brew
"TRF" Member
 
Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Larry
Location: Finger Lakes
Posts: 6,007
I think gd is better than ss. I think this is how the real world looks at the question. Kitchen utensils are made from stainless steel. Things of value are made from precious metals.
Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 08:00 AM   #6
Boba Fett
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Kamino
Watch: Star Wars
Posts: 382
I feel like the OP is tired and emotional. It is a confusing post with an unclear question further muddied by the fact you can buy a new full PM Daytona cheaper than a new SS Daytona on the secondary market.
Boba Fett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 08:04 AM   #7
MTdweller
"TRF" Member
 
MTdweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Ty
Location: West Coast
Watch: the time fly!
Posts: 1,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zakalwe View Post
It’s all about how it makes you feel.

Apply logic vigorously enough to this topic and you end up concluding, absolutely correctly, that spending more than a few hundred bucks on a wrist-mounted time-keeping device is not rational period, regardless of what it’s made.
Very true.
MTdweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 08:06 AM   #8
Partagas
"TRF" Member
 
Partagas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex DD
Posts: 306
Gold is quite scarce compared to steel. So it costs alot more. I can reconcile that in the cost of a watch. I'm one of those that would never pay $10-15k+ for an all stainless steel watch, but would for one in a precious metal. It just doesn't add up for me in all steel. Many of my watches have a stainless case, and some bracelet. And I love 'em all, but none of them were anywhere close to $10k+ in all stainless.

The premium for platinum is pretty steep, and while I'd love a platinum timepiece, unless I hit the Powerball I'm very unlikely to ever spend $40-50k plus for a modern platinum watch.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Partagas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 08:26 AM   #9
macrowatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,366
So I bought a gold coin for my nephew’s piggy bank. Face value says $50 US. Does the coin have more inherit value than my $50 paper bill?

Tongue and cheek aside, if not had the same market value, paper is much more functional to use for payment and carrying around, but boy that shiny coin sure is pretty. Maybe if they both started out only being worth their face value the allure to that shiny non functional yellow would soon drive up market price and create a spread between the functional paper and less functional gold coin.
macrowatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 08:26 AM   #10
Jabbo84
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2019
Real Name: John
Location: Tyler,Texas
Watch: Rolex/Piaget
Posts: 966
Gold is Gold
Jabbo84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 08:29 AM   #11
UK_
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: London
Posts: 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus49 View Post
All metals are made of atoms, just rearranged differently. Humans assigned values to each metal. Objectively one does not cost more than another: humans long ago decided which metals they value more. If you value steel more than gold, great. Now you have to convince the rest of civilization to go along with you.


‘Cost’ means nothing - the price of something is all a kit supply and demand.

Water is precious for life but we have lots of it, gold is scarce but has a high demand.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
UK_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 08:43 AM   #12
cerendigit
"TRF" Member
 
cerendigit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Seattle
Watch: f91w
Posts: 1,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabbo84 View Post
Gold is Gold


This is exactly the kind of things that triggered me to ask this question.

From reading this thread all I can make is that gold is “valuable” because:
- it’s shiny and pretty
- it’s more rare than steel thus feels “special” and not so common.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
cerendigit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 08:44 AM   #13
Burlington
"TRF" Member
 
Burlington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,643
Gold has long been held in high regard by human civilisation - as jewellery and currency it is better than steel.

As a material for a tool, steel wins out.

Choose the right metal for the job.
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.”

― Winston S. Churchill
Burlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 08:47 AM   #14
aayates
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 914
I agree

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zakalwe View Post
It’s all about how it makes you feel.

Apply logic vigorously enough to this topic and you end up concluding, absolutely correctly, that spending more than a few hundred bucks on a wrist-mounted time-keeping device is not rational period, regardless of what it’s made.
It's a hobby and it's fun, but not a value proposition. It's just great to see a watch you like on your wrist. If you're trying to justify price vs. value you won't get there from here.
aayates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 08:48 AM   #15
Zakalwe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Sal
Location: London
Posts: 2,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by cerendigit View Post
From reading this thread all I can make is that gold is “valuable” because:
- it’s shiny and pretty
- it’s more rare than steel thus feels “special” and not so common.
Yup. End thread.
__________________
“Never argue with idiots. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." - Mark Twain
Zakalwe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 09:52 AM   #16
YGRLX
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: N/A
Posts: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus49 View Post
All metals are made of atoms, just rearranged differently. Humans assigned values to each metal. Objectively one does not cost more than another: humans long ago decided which metals they value more. If you value steel more than gold, great. Now you have to convince the rest of civilization to go along with you.
Congrats! You won the most ignorant comment of the day!
YGRLX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 10:02 AM   #17
4 Aussies
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
4 Aussies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Real Name: Randy
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: Blue Sky
Posts: 3,164
One pound of SS 304 2B grade is $1.58 a pound

One pound of pure 24K gold is valued at $21,000.00

You tell me what metal is worth more????
4 Aussies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 10:05 AM   #18
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by YGRLX View Post
Congrats! You won the most ignorant comment of the day!
And I thought it was one of his more intelligent posts.

__________________
E

Andad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 10:07 AM   #19
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
Rolex is the new gold standard .
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 10:18 AM   #20
jrs146
"TRF" Member
 
jrs146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
I hardly assign a value to the meal at all when buying a watch. I simply buy what I like. I gave steel prices that are more expensive than my gold pieces. And I care not.
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own."
-Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter
jrs146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 10:19 AM   #21
cerendigit
"TRF" Member
 
cerendigit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Seattle
Watch: f91w
Posts: 1,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4 Aussies View Post
One pound of SS 304 2B grade is $1.58 a pound



One pound of pure 24K gold is valued at $21,000.00


:

Interesting. Are you saying that you are more willing to pay a high price for a gold Rolex because you know that the base material costs more _to_ Rolex?

So does that mean that if the wages in certain parts of Switzerland were higher you would be willing to pay more for watches from that region because you know they cost more to make?

(This is a different opinion than “I like gold because it looks good and it’s rare”)



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
cerendigit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 10:22 AM   #22
4 Aussies
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
4 Aussies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Real Name: Randy
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: Blue Sky
Posts: 3,164
Quote:
Originally Posted by cerendigit View Post
Interesting. Are you saying that you are more willing to pay a high price for a gold Rolex because you know that the base material costs more _to_ Rolex?

So does that mean that if the wages in certain parts of Switzerland were higher you would be willing to pay more for watches from that region because you know they cost more to make?

(This is a different opinion than “I like gold because it looks good and it’s rare”)



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes and Yes! Bottom line, you get what you pay for!!
4 Aussies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 10:25 AM   #23
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by cerendigit View Post
. . .

Do you think that a watch made of gold is “better” (all else being equal of course) and thus justifies a higher price. Whereas a high price for a steel price is “not justified”? If so why?
Of course a gold watch is not "better" than any other metal.

In order to prove that something it better, you would need to develop actual qualitative and tangible values. The facts: tensile strength, impact resistance, shear strength, structural thickness; all would actually put stainless steel as the "better" product.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 11:01 AM   #24
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
There are guys paying upwards of 25K+ for a SS Daytona which is the same price I paid for my BNIB YG Submariner. Absolutely nuts!
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 11:03 AM   #25
cerendigit
"TRF" Member
 
cerendigit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Seattle
Watch: f91w
Posts: 1,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigblu10 View Post
There are guys paying upwards of 25K+ for a SS Daytona which is the same price I paid for my BNIB YG Submariner. Absolutely nuts!
lol yeah that's the point, why do you think that's nuts?
cerendigit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 11:05 AM   #26
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
Gee, thanks. I appreciate the insight.

Quote:
Originally Posted by YGRLX View Post
Congrats! You won the most ignorant comment of the day!
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 11:08 AM   #27
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
There was a time when most people would rather buy steel Rolex watches because they held their value better and most people, if they bought PM Rolex watches at all, expected a deep discount.

Now that the price of steel Rolex watches has skyrocketed on the grey and secondary markets, and they are hard to find at MSRP, people have noticed that it's not such a long stretch to move up to PM models.

This is a relatively new phenomenon.

There are, of course, those who prefer PM on the basis of heft and that special glow that PMs have over steel. These people tend to be in the minority, though.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 11:08 AM   #28
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by cerendigit View Post
lol yeah that's the point, why do you think that's nuts?
18K Gold> Steel 24/7/365
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 11:33 AM   #29
RTG
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
RTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Watch: YM42 Ti
Posts: 2,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Of course a gold watch is not "better" than any other metal.

In order to prove that something it better, you would need to develop actual qualitative and tangible values. The facts: tensile strength, impact resistance, shear strength, structural thickness; all would actually put stainless steel as the "better" product.
Poor people carry steel to win the king more gold. Thank you for your sacrifice!
__________________
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019
RTG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2019, 11:42 AM   #30
RTG
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
RTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Watch: YM42 Ti
Posts: 2,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
There are, of course, those who prefer PM on the basis of heft and that special glow that PMs have over steel. These people tend to be in the minority, though.
My friend I’m afraid you’re forgetting the price factor. I believe if an 18 karat gold or platinum Rolex cost the same as stainless steel, then you would see a lot more of them being sold and worn.

Not many would pay $9050 for a SS Sub LV when the same $9050 could buy a WG 116619lb. The fact is most people don’t even consider a gold Rolex because it’s 3 to 4 times the price.

To the entire “SS only” audience. How many of you proposed to your wife with a steel wedding ring? Just tell her it’s better.
__________________
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019
RTG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.