ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
5 January 2020, 12:14 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 29
|
Help me decide on Day dates
Im interested in adding a vintage Day Date to my collection. I am equally intrigued with the 18038/18238 versus the 19018 DD Oysterquartz. Would greatly appreciate opinions.
Thank you |
5 January 2020, 01:33 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
|
Would love to help, but not sure what your question is. Can you clarify?
|
5 January 2020, 03:37 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 29
|
The watches are both Day Dates with distinctively different looks and function. I was just seeking opinions on how each resonates with the TRF community. I like them both equally but will seek to purchase only one. I was just looking for the communities opinion on which they would prefer. That’s all.
|
30 April 2020, 08:19 AM | #4 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: 33139/95460
Posts: 1,413
|
Quote:
|
|
5 January 2020, 05:23 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: /
Posts: 1,741
|
I can share some thoughts...if you decide to go with your first DD I would definitely opt for the classic automatic one with the classic president bracelet. I own both the white gold and the yellow gold 1803 versions and I love them. I think you can really feel that the president range was more of a flagship range compare to the Datejust series.
The 19018 has more of a 80’s square design feel to its case and not so smooth built. Another down side with 19018 movement is that it’s harder (more expensive) to fix/service once it gets broken or needs service (from what I hear)... |
5 January 2020, 05:40 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: /
Posts: 1,741
|
|
5 January 2020, 01:40 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
|
If you're going vintage Day-Date, go 1803. That's your quality single-malt Scotch in front of the fireplace with friends and family, as opposed to a rum and Coke in some random nightclub.
|
21 January 2020, 07:31 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
|
Beautifully articulated and most definitely correct.
__________________
@imrootbeer7 |
5 January 2020, 02:06 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,659
|
18238 would be my choice out of the two.
__________________
✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron. |
10 January 2020, 08:42 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Oliver Nightin
Location: Northampton
Watch: day date 1803
Posts: 128
|
Just ensure it hasn't been heavily polished and the stretch isn't so bad. I agree with Zapokee with the 1803 Ref. Have you also looked at 1607 datejusts also?
|
10 January 2020, 09:31 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Toronto
Watch: ♕
Posts: 2,125
|
Spent some time looking myself just over a year ago.
Found perfection with an 18238, A serial (1999), silver dial with sticks, had it serviced and the technician said the case had never been opened and it was in pretty much new condition, was fairly certain I'd found a "safe queen". |
10 January 2020, 11:20 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Pete
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: 1016.
Posts: 694
|
Now that's a crisp example of a 20-year-old watch, good for you! Er your post might get the boot though, pretty sure that watch ain't "vintage".
|
10 January 2020, 11:24 AM | #13 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Toronto
Watch: ♕
Posts: 2,125
|
Quote:
Well, I'll let the pic sit in its glory till it's blown away... |
|
10 January 2020, 09:09 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: island
Posts: 99
|
I like the 18038 single set.Over the 1803 Thicker case less gold milled out inside. 100 meters wr so I can wear it in the water. Crystal non plexy sits lower and more durable. !8038 second choice but I like the the thicker 18038 case and double quick makes no difference to me since its worn daily.
|
21 January 2020, 07:25 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: DOUBLE RY
Location: NYC
Watch: and learn.
Posts: 289
|
I don't have a perpetual DD but I absolutely love my OQ DD. The bracelet is super comfortable, and the burlwood dial is mesmerizing. I do want to add an 1803 to my rotation. One day.
|
21 January 2020, 07:48 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 146
|
Just try them on and buy what you like the best, instead of buying what others tell you to buy
|
26 April 2020, 04:29 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Texas
Posts: 97
|
I’m lovin my 18238.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 April 2020, 06:18 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: /
Posts: 1,741
|
|
30 April 2020, 02:17 AM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: PRJ
Posts: 1,732
|
By all means, try them on! I love both, the OQ has a great feel to it, substantial and streamlined, and they are a relative bargain in the secondary market. Resale-wise, the 1803 is more recognized and easier to sell than the OQ, definitely check out the Wide-Boy dials and hands as a preferred option (they're very sexy!).
__________________
"Do you like Breitling?" "I don't know, really, I've never been Breitled" |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.