ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

yousefhammad · 19 January 2020, 07:56 PM

Hello!

Does this look like low magnification?

Thank you

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

padi56 · 19 January 2020, 08:08 PM

No if you can easily read the date you have nothing to worry about.

Bmw1 · 19 January 2020, 08:09 PM

Here’s mine

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yess · 19 January 2020, 08:29 PM

God forbid you'd need your rolex to confirm what the date was.

Dsmith1974 · 19 January 2020, 09:05 PM

Looks about right to me.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rad87gn · 19 January 2020, 09:37 PM

Wasn't there some watches released that had lower than normal mag on the date? Can't remember the time frame.

JayHantz · 19 January 2020, 10:07 PM

Looks fine.

travisb · 19 January 2020, 10:11 PM

Looks good. There was a short run where there was a lot of low mag going out but I think that was resolved. Haven't seen it on a new model in a while.

padi56 · 19 January 2020, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rad87gn

Wasn't there some watches released that had lower than normal mag on the date? Can't remember the time frame.

Yes a few years back now but most were widely exaggerated around the forums at most there was magnification on some 1.5X, and Rolex did change on the web site to being 1.5X instead of around 2.0X.

HogwldFLTR · 19 January 2020, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yousefhammad

Hello!

Does this look like low magnification?

Thank you

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're kidding, right? That looks great!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by padi56

Yes a few years back now but most were widely exaggerated around the forums at most there was magnification on some 1.5X, and Rolex did change on the web site to being 1.5X instead of around 2.0X.

IIRC it turned out to be a supplier issue for Rolex.

904VT · 19 January 2020, 10:58 PM

Looks good to me

yousefhammad · 19 January 2020, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travisb

Looks good. There was a short run where there was a lot of low mag going out but I think that was resolved. Haven't seen it on a new model in a while.

This is a 2014 model actually

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yousefhammad · 19 January 2020, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR

You're kidding, right? That looks great!!!

I had a black submariner 2016 the magnification was higher actually than this

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yousefhammad · 19 January 2020, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yess

God forbid you'd need your rolex to confirm what the date was.

Hahahaha

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Boaters · 19 January 2020, 11:06 PM

It is perfect

mountainjogger · 19 January 2020, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boaters

It is perfect

x2!

1William · 19 January 2020, 11:39 PM

I think it looks good. Enjoy a great watch.

MSchu · 19 January 2020, 11:42 PM

I'd sell it... how much do you want for it?

enjoythemusic · 19 January 2020, 11:46 PM

Good to go, enjoy your time :)

Harry-57 · 19 January 2020, 11:47 PM

My immediate reaction was that it is low magnification.

I just checked my 2018 116610LV. It looks about the same.

Lighting can do funny things.

yousefhammad · 20 January 2020, 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MSchu

I'd sell it... how much do you want for it?

One kidney please

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yousefhammad · 20 January 2020, 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harry-57

My immediate reaction was that it is low magnification.

I just checked my 2018 116610LV. It looks about the same.

Lighting can do funny things.

True

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

NachoNeal · 20 January 2020, 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by enjoythemusic

Good to go, enjoy your time :)

And your date!

watchmework · 20 January 2020, 01:45 AM

Looks appropriate to me.

214270Explorer · 20 January 2020, 03:08 AM

It is absolutely perfect; looks like all other Subs.

GGGMT · 20 January 2020, 03:13 AM

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GovernorsGovernor · 20 January 2020, 03:56 AM

Flip it.

Rori · 20 January 2020, 04:03 AM

Never came to my mind to check mine. Is Rolex not standard on cyclops magnification power they use?

Phil t 32 · 20 January 2020, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mountainjogger

x2!

x1.5 isn’t it?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ArcticMoose · 20 January 2020, 04:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yousefhammad

Does this look like low magnification?

Yes. It does.

I had the crystal replaced on a Sub that looked just like that.

Rolex took care of it under warranty, of course.

Quote:

Originally Posted by yousefhammad

This is a 2014 model actually

As was mine.

19 January 2020, 07:56 PM	#1
yousefhammad "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: Jordan Posts: 55	Is this low magnification? Hello! Does this look like low magnification? Thank you Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

19 January 2020, 08:08 PM	#2
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 53,063	No if you can easily read the date you have nothing to worry about. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

19 January 2020, 09:37 PM	#6
rad87gn "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chad Location: Des Moines, Iowa Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega Posts: 1,607	Wasn't there some watches released that had lower than normal mag on the date? Can't remember the time frame. __________________ Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52

19 January 2020, 11:46 PM	#19
enjoythemusic 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Real Name: Steven Location: Glocal Posts: 21,198	Good to go, enjoy your time :) __________________ __________________ ----> Was Great Seeing Everyone At The TRF December 9 Tampa Meetup <---- https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=968133 Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school. www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/ Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.

20 January 2020, 03:08 AM	#25
214270Explorer "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2018 Location: United States Watch: me buy Watches Posts: 3,955	It is absolutely perfect; looks like all other Subs. __________________ “The display of actual intelligence terrifies much of mankind” Rolex "some" Tudor "some" Damasko "some" Misc Pieces "some" Marathon "some" GS Spring Drive "some" Hamilton "some" Findeisen "some"

19 January 2020, 08:09 PM	#3
Bmw1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2019 Location: Usa Posts: 112	Here’s mine Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

19 January 2020, 08:29 PM	#4
Yess "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2020 Location: Good Hope Watch: 124060 Posts: 1,596	God forbid you'd need your rolex to confirm what the date was.

19 January 2020, 09:05 PM	#5
Dsmith1974 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2018 Real Name: Duncan Location: London Watch: DD 40 Posts: 2,263	Looks about right to me. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

19 January 2020, 10:07 PM	#7
JayHantz 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2018 Real Name: Jonathan Location: Texas Watch: @Escapementt Posts: 9,844	Looks fine.

19 January 2020, 10:11 PM	#8
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,493	Looks good. There was a short run where there was a lot of low mag going out but I think that was resolved. Haven't seen it on a new model in a while.

19 January 2020, 10:58 PM	#11
904VT "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: USA Watch: All Rolex Posts: 7,024	Looks good to me

19 January 2020, 11:06 PM	#15
Boaters 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD Posts: 10,653	It is perfect

19 January 2020, 11:39 PM	#17
1William 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 47,787	I think it looks good. Enjoy a great watch.

19 January 2020, 11:42 PM	#18
MSchu Banned Join Date: May 2019 Real Name: Schumacher Location: Las vegas Posts: 826	I'd sell it... how much do you want for it?

19 January 2020, 11:47 PM	#20
Harry-57 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2018 Real Name: Harry Location: England Posts: 10,681	My immediate reaction was that it is low magnification. I just checked my 2018 116610LV. It looks about the same. Lighting can do funny things.

20 January 2020, 01:45 AM	#24
watchmework "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2017 Location: DC Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600 Posts: 7,869	Looks appropriate to me.

20 January 2020, 03:13 AM	#26
GGGMT 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Itinerant Watch: 79010sg Posts: 8,346	Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

20 January 2020, 03:56 AM	#27
GovernorsGovernor "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2019 Location: Westland, MI Posts: 212	Flip it.

20 January 2020, 04:03 AM	#28
Rori "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2018 Location: Middle East Watch: Rolex / Tudor Posts: 3,592	really Never came to my mind to check mine. Is Rolex not standard on cyclops magnification power they use? __________________ Good watches are made to tell time but some brands are obsessed to tell it in the most beautiful way possible.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)