ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jtvision · 24 March 2009, 05:46 PM

http://www.chronometrie.com/rolex3135/rolex3135.html

Best breakdown of the movement I have found. Much thanks to the author!

joeRolexer · 25 March 2009, 06:48 AM

great info...Thanks

rogerrabbit168 · 25 March 2009, 01:25 PM

wow

mixedccr · 25 March 2009, 08:56 PM

Perfect! Thank you.

Valing · 14 October 2009, 11:21 PM

Great!!
Now I can open my watch and do a thorough sevicing:-)!
I wish:-(

zidaneong · 15 October 2009, 09:40 PM

thanks for sharing. :)

ersnyder · 16 October 2009, 03:23 AM

The time piece becomes even more fascinating with "inside" information! Thanks for posting this.

JJ Irani · 16 October 2009, 03:26 AM

Thanks, great stuff......added that link to my favourites.

JJ

R1@160@alltimes · 16 October 2009, 04:00 AM

Top shelf write up

jatco · 25 April 2010, 04:56 AM

I know this is an old thread..with excellent info..but I was wondering if it worth getting a 1979ìsh Rolex with the 3035 (I believer) vs a newer watch with the 3135 movement.
I saw a 1979 DT with 18k President bracelet that Im considering.
What do you think.
tia

wildsidemtb · 28 April 2010, 07:33 PM

Fantastic info I read it from top to bottom

cujo · 29 April 2010, 12:32 AM

Exceptional Read Thanks for sharing.

escapizm · 14 August 2010, 05:51 PM

Awesome read...

yong5 · 1 December 2010, 04:35 PM

Awesome. it's really informative.
Another level of appreciation toward workhouse '3135'!!

rxonmymind · 1 December 2010, 06:20 PM

I'll definately red it when it's not 12:20 m. Looks good though/ Thank you!

ferdelance · 1 December 2010, 06:23 PM

very interesting

Trailblazer · 7 December 2010, 03:08 PM

That made me love Rolex even more

Rolex_Luther07 · 11 August 2017, 11:33 PM

Interesting that he still preferred the ETA movement. I think the 3135 has stood the test of time now, I wonder when this article was written and if he still sticks to his conclusions. Also, it's well known by now that every Rolex goes through rigorous testing before leaving the factory, so I am surprised that he was somewhat skeptical of the shock absorbers. If the brand new Sea Dweller was $5K when the article was written, I assume the article is pretty old. Great pics and detailed information, thanks for posting even if it was a longn time ago.

tehclaw14 · 10 September 2017, 05:39 PM

I never seen info like this

padi56 · 10 September 2017, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rolex_Luther07

Interesting that he still preferred the ETA movement. I think the 3135 has stood the test of time now, I wonder when this article was written and if he still sticks to his conclusions. Also, it's well known by now that every Rolex goes through rigorous testing before leaving the factory, so I am surprised that he was somewhat skeptical of the shock absorbers. If the brand new Sea Dweller was $5K when the article was written, I assume the article is pretty old. Great pics and detailed information, thanks for posting even if it was a longn time ago.

Well if you did look and read the thread it was first posted in 2009, read these old threads but please do not reply to them.

24 March 2009, 05:46 PM	#1
jtvision Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Vancouver Watch: Seiko to Rolex Posts: 225	Rolex cal. 3135 http://www.chronometrie.com/rolex3135/rolex3135.html Best breakdown of the movement I have found. Much thanks to the author!

15 October 2009, 09:40 PM	#6
zidaneong "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Singapore Watch: Rolex YG Datejust Posts: 274	thanks for sharing. :) __________________ [1] Rolex TT Blue Dial Submariner 16613 (M serial) [2] Rolex YG Datejust 16018 (8 mil Serial) [3] Rolex YG Datejust 16238 (L Serial) [4] Rolex YG Gold Crystal Daytona 116518 [5] Patek Philippe SS Aquanaut 5065

16 October 2009, 03:26 AM	#8
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Thanks, great stuff......added that link to my favourites. JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

16 October 2009, 04:00 AM	#9
R1@160@alltimes "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: USA Watch: ♛ Posts: 4,408	Top shelf write up __________________

25 April 2010, 04:56 AM	#10
jatco 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Thomas Location: YVR Watch: 116233/79190 Posts: 50,525	I know this is an old thread..with excellent info..but I was wondering if it worth getting a 1979ìsh Rolex with the 3035 (I believer) vs a newer watch with the 3135 movement. I saw a 1979 DT with 18k President bracelet that Im considering. What do you think. tia __________________ . ..- ' A Crown for every achievement '

25 March 2009, 06:48 AM	#2
joeRolexer "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Rialto.California Posts: 25	great info...Thanks

25 March 2009, 01:25 PM	#3
rogerrabbit168 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Toronto Posts: 413	wow

25 March 2009, 08:56 PM	#4
mixedccr Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: omar Location: singapore Watch: deepsea Posts: 192	Perfect! Thank you.

14 October 2009, 11:21 PM	#5
Valing "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: NO.VA, USA Posts: 3	Great!! Now I can open my watch and do a thorough sevicing:-)! I wish:-(

16 October 2009, 03:23 AM	#7
ersnyder 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Eric Location: Long Beach CA USA Watch: Rolex Explorer II Posts: 4,102	The time piece becomes even more fascinating with "inside" information! Thanks for posting this.

28 April 2010, 07:33 PM	#11
wildsidemtb Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Australia Watch: Sea Dweller, 5512 Posts: 602	Fantastic info I read it from top to bottom

29 April 2010, 12:32 AM	#12
cujo Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Florida, USA Watch: Pepsi GMT... Posts: 211	Exceptional Read Thanks for sharing.

14 August 2010, 05:51 PM	#13
escapizm "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: England Posts: 17	Awesome read...

1 December 2010, 04:35 PM	#14
yong5 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Singapore Posts: 12	Awesome. it's really informative. Another level of appreciation toward workhouse '3135'!!

1 December 2010, 06:20 PM	#15
rxonmymind "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Brandon Location: Sacramento Watch: Rolex woot! woot! Posts: 824	I'll definately red it when it's not 12:20 m. Looks good though/ Thank you! __________________ Be yourself; Everyone else is taken! Oscar Wilde

1 December 2010, 06:23 PM	#16
ferdelance "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: france Posts: 37	very interesting

7 December 2010, 03:08 PM	#17
Trailblazer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Cab Location: A small world Watch: es Posts: 776	That made me love Rolex even more

11 August 2017, 11:33 PM	#18
Rolex_Luther07 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2017 Location: New York Posts: 29	Interesting that he still preferred the ETA movement. I think the 3135 has stood the test of time now, I wonder when this article was written and if he still sticks to his conclusions. Also, it's well known by now that every Rolex goes through rigorous testing before leaving the factory, so I am surprised that he was somewhat skeptical of the shock absorbers. If the brand new Sea Dweller was $5K when the article was written, I assume the article is pretty old. Great pics and detailed information, thanks for posting even if it was a longn time ago.

10 September 2017, 05:39 PM	#19
tehclaw14 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Patrick Location: Alexandria, VA Watch: Rolex Datejust SS Posts: 40	I never seen info like this

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)