ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 February 2020, 01:46 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 4
|
Opinion on this Sumbariner 14060m
Hi All
I'm interested in buying a Submariner and I like the 14060m. I've not bought a used Rolex before and I was hoping that those with more experience may be able to take a look at the attached photos and let me know if there's anything of concern. They've admitted that it has signs of being polished and I can live with that as long as it's not been done badly. They're asking for £5995. It comes with box but no papers. Any help or opinions on this watch would be appreciated. Thanks Nic |
15 February 2020, 02:02 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 4
|
Oh and it's 2004
|
15 February 2020, 02:10 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
Looks alright to me.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
15 February 2020, 10:02 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 4
|
Would appreciate anyone else’s opinion. Anything that you can see that would cause alarm?
Thanks |
15 February 2020, 10:07 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: United States
Watch: me buy Watches
Posts: 3,955
|
Comparing it closely to mine, I only see one issue(?) and that is that the bezel insert numbers appear a bit "shorter" (less tall) than mine.
My numbers go "almost" to both edges of the bezel insert. But what you have may be perfectly normal for your year of production? And it has only been lightly polished. My 14060M is factory-issue (non-modified) from year 2010. Others need to chime in about their year 2004 Sub.
__________________
“The display of actual intelligence terrifies much of mankind” Rolex "some" Tudor "some" Damasko "some" Misc Pieces "some" Marathon "some" GS Spring Drive "some" Hamilton "some" Findeisen "some" |
15 February 2020, 10:10 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Newport Beach
Posts: 10
|
I looks good to me. Doesn’t look like it’s had too much polishing, which is a good thing.
|
15 February 2020, 07:35 PM | #7 |
SCUMBAG
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: uk
Posts: 341
|
Looks fine
|
16 February 2020, 12:36 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Mick
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,524
|
Can't go wrong with a two line 14060m.
A true classic. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
16 February 2020, 01:34 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
|
The nails are ok also, not too long, not dirty......
|
16 February 2020, 04:56 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
|
Impossible to 100% authenticate a watch those photos.
One can say "no red flags" but thats not authenticating At least get some photos of engraving beteen the lugs
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill "We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done." |
17 February 2020, 05:32 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 4
|
Thanks everyone
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.