The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4 March 2020, 11:38 AM   #1
cemeabeme
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: NL
Location: NYC
Posts: 156
1680 Cyclops Date Appearance Inquiry

Hi, All:

I recently purchased a 1680 and was wondering why the vintage Rolexes dates appear so much larger than Circa 90’s and 2000’s Rolex cyclops dates?

Is it due to acrylic crystals used on vintage rolexes? Or does it have anything to do w/AR coating?

Just wondering. Though I now certainly prefer the look of “enlarged” dates on vintage rolexes.

I’ve attached some basic (and not the best) iPhone photos of 1680 acrylic vs. 16710 sapphire (Y serial on jubilee).

Thanks!
Attached Images
       
cemeabeme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2020, 02:15 PM   #2
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
1680 Cyclops Date Appearance Inquiry

Quote:
Originally Posted by cemeabeme View Post



Is it due to acrylic crystals used on vintage rolexes? Or does it have anything to do w/AR coating?




It is partially due to the acrylic crystal - the greater magnification is due to the height of the cyclops on an acrylic crystal above the plane of the date wheel. This is especially true in the sports models with greater than 3ATM water resistance. The acrylic has to be thicker to withstand the pressure - thus the cyclops is even higher on a Sub than a DJ.

There is no A/R involved on the acrylic crystals. And any A/R under some sapphire crystal cyclops doesn’t affect the magnification on those.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2020, 02:53 PM   #3
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
Some of the sapphire crystals from your photos appear to have aftermarket crystals - they do not appear to have the proper 2 1/2 magnification which factory acrylic and sapphire Rolex crystals will exhibit.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2020, 09:14 PM   #4
cemeabeme
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: NL
Location: NYC
Posts: 156
@77T: Thank you very much for the feedback.

@springer: Rolex performed an overall 5 years ago on the GMT sapphire and it did not note that the crystal was aftermarket. Perhaps it’s the angle of the photo or lighting why the sapphire appears aftermarket in the photos. Also, the gmt II is the same watch in each photo

Thanks for your reply as well. Though I’m curious why the photos appear to show the sapphire as an aftermarket piece. Hmm?
cemeabeme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2020, 04:57 AM   #5
dbhak22
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
Yes, this has been discussed quite a bit here on the forum (you can do a search if you want to do some reading). But essentially, the mag levels have seem to be coming down as time has passed...here's one thread discussing this and a picture I posted in that thread for comparison:

THREAD: https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=457138

__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2020, 10:58 AM   #6
cemeabeme
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: NL
Location: NYC
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbhak22 View Post
Yes, this has been discussed quite a bit here on the forum (you can do a search if you want to do some reading). But essentially, the mag levels have seem to be coming down as time has passed...here's one thread discussing this and a picture I posted in that thread for comparison:

THREAD: https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=457138

@dbhak22: Thank you.
cemeabeme is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.