ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

spare · 7 April 2020, 07:51 PM

Thought some of you may like this. Cool to see these watches put to action.
I assume risk should be limited if they did pressure test them, but nice pics nonetheless.

https://gearpatrol.com/2020/04/06/de...x-submariners/

42itus · 7 April 2020, 08:02 PM

Very cool. I would never but love to see this.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dirt · 7 April 2020, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spare

Thought some of you may like this. Cool to see these watches put to action.
I assume risk should be limited if they did pressure test them, but nice pics nonetheless.

https://gearpatrol.com/2020/04/06/de...x-submariners/

I believe your assumption is correct and the risk would be the same as any other watch that is properly maintained.

Thanks for sharing

AJMarcus · 7 April 2020, 10:06 PM

The risk certainly outweighs any benefit. Just like driving an antique car on a big road trip there are too many mechanical risks. In this case, waterproofness. His watch his money.

swaini3 · 8 April 2020, 03:33 AM

so nice to see how tough these watches are.... but I would never do it

RyanPrasad · 8 April 2020, 03:54 AM

SEXY PICS! I was in Australia over the Christmas holiday and went scuba diving in the Great Barrier Reef, hit the Undine Reef. Wore my 16800 down there and couldn't help but sneak peaks at it during the dive. Felt SO satisfying to see the thing in it's natural habitat. Granted we didn't go below 15m :P

EDIT: I did have 16800 recently serviced by Rolex RSC in Sydney so felt OK about taking it down there........granted this is still debatable.

Styles Bitchley · 8 April 2020, 12:48 PM

I’ve been down with my red sub. Albeit, not in the past decade. Something so special about it. Thanks for posting.

zapokee · 8 April 2020, 12:57 PM

Cool pics, but a very unnecessary risk. There are much cheaper and more appropriate watches for diving.

RJG · 8 April 2020, 01:13 PM

Nobody dives with a dive watch. A Uwatec bottom timer on a bungee strap, yes. Or a Shearwater Perdix ( or Petrel ) just never a dive watch.

phillip ridley · 8 April 2020, 01:38 PM

Yes, this is great!! I tell my clients this all the time and how durable these really are as long as they get pressure tested and preventive maintenance...Get it serviced...worry not.

Also, the watch passing the pressure test has nothing to do with the mechanics, it is strictly the external components - care for those and you are golden.

7 April 2020, 07:51 PM	#1
spare "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2019 Location: Europe Watch: 5513 Posts: 167	Scuba diving with vintage 1680 & 5513 Thought some of you may like this. Cool to see these watches put to action. I assume risk should be limited if they did pressure test them, but nice pics nonetheless. https://gearpatrol.com/2020/04/06/de...x-submariners/

8 April 2020, 03:54 AM	#6
RyanPrasad "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Real Name: NotRyan? Location: Chicago Watch: Daytona 16520 Posts: 114	SEXY PICS! I was in Australia over the Christmas holiday and went scuba diving in the Great Barrier Reef, hit the Undine Reef. Wore my 16800 down there and couldn't help but sneak peaks at it during the dive. Felt SO satisfying to see the thing in it's natural habitat. Granted we didn't go below 15m :P EDIT: I did have 16800 recently serviced by Rolex RSC in Sydney so felt OK about taking it down there........granted this is still debatable. __________________ 16800 Matte \| 16750 No-Date \| 16550 Polar \| 16520 White Inverted 6 \| 1601 Linen Sigma

8 April 2020, 01:38 PM	#10
phillip ridley 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: Mesa, Arizona Watch: 1971 Rolex Red Sub Posts: 555	Yes, this is great!! I tell my clients this all the time and how durable these really are as long as they get pressure tested and preventive maintenance...Get it serviced...worry not. Also, the watch passing the pressure test has nothing to do with the mechanics, it is strictly the external components - care for those and you are golden. __________________ [email protected]

7 April 2020, 08:02 PM	#2
42itus "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2018 Real Name: Tom Location: Honolulu Watch: 116519LN Posts: 3,828	Very cool. I would never but love to see this. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

7 April 2020, 10:06 PM	#4
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,238	The risk certainly outweighs any benefit. Just like driving an antique car on a big road trip there are too many mechanical risks. In this case, waterproofness. His watch his money.

8 April 2020, 03:33 AM	#5
swaini3 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Real Name: Mo Location: Dubai Watch: 1675 GMT, DRSD Posts: 1,459	so nice to see how tough these watches are.... but I would never do it

8 April 2020, 12:48 PM	#7
Styles Bitchley "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2017 Location: Canada Watch: 1680 Posts: 1,398	I’ve been down with my red sub. Albeit, not in the past decade. Something so special about it. Thanks for posting.

8 April 2020, 12:57 PM	#8
zapokee "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Japan Posts: 4,367	Cool pics, but a very unnecessary risk. There are much cheaper and more appropriate watches for diving.

8 April 2020, 01:13 PM	#9
RJG "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2020 Real Name: Jim Location: Seattle Watch: 116610LN Posts: 404	Nobody dives with a dive watch. A Uwatec bottom timer on a bungee strap, yes. Or a Shearwater Perdix ( or Petrel ) just never a dive watch.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)