ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 April 2009, 06:52 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Ahmed Keraidy
Location: Cairo,Egypt
Watch: Submariner 16610 M
Posts: 816
|
SuperLuminova
Folks,
Depending on the superluminova brightness, for how long can a Submariner -for example- be luminous after being exposed to sun for couple of hours??? Thanks, Ahmed |
4 April 2009, 07:05 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
I think if you expose the SL to sun for 10 sec it'll stay visible for same amount of time as if you let it sit for 2 hr under the sun
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
4 April 2009, 08:15 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Texas on my mind
Watch: Sub Date; SS/WG DJ
Posts: 2,445
|
I don't think it's related to how long it stays in the sun. The radioactive particles (I don't know if this is the scientifically correct way to describe them) become more "agitated" with sunlight than with artificial light, so sunlight will keep it "charged" longer. It continues to emit light energy for like 10 or 12 hours, it just becomes less visible after two or three hours (depending on how old the SL material is).
I can still see mine in the morning, after 7 hours of sleep...but it's dim. It has to be really, really dark in the bedroom for me to tell the time.
__________________
16610 Submariner Date; D Serial 16234 DateJust SS with WG Fluted Bezel & Jubillee, White Roman Dial; F Serial 16570 Explorer II White Dial; M Serial And Hers: 78240 Mid-Size DateJust SS with Domed Bezel & Oyster, White Roman; D Serial |
4 April 2009, 08:20 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
It doesn't matter whether its 10 minutes or 10 hours, the lume brightness dulls to a light glow in about 30 minutes, Rolex is not known for having great lume!
~Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
4 April 2009, 08:22 AM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Axel
Location: Germany
Watch: view my signature
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
Hi Ahmed, There is no differnce between haviing it maybe 30 seconds under a light or a few hours in the sun. Where you have for sure massive differences in between the same models even the same year are the Vintage models.... |
|
4 April 2009, 08:30 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Quote:
My 2 SeaDwellers hold true to this hypothesis. One is 9 years old, the other is less than a year. The SL on them is the same.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
|
4 April 2009, 08:35 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Axel
Location: Germany
Watch: view my signature
Posts: 612
|
Changed SL mid 90s + 16600 + 16660....
Quote:
SL changed its consistence mid 90s, so there is a difference. That is what you can also see on the 16600 and 16660.... |
|
4 April 2009, 09:42 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,937
|
I don't know if I am ansering your question but my Sub LV (when fully charged) lasts about 3-4 good hours. No Rolex has great lume but the LV lume is better than I expected.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.