ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 July 2020, 03:32 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
Datejust for girl
What size do you think is more suitable for a girl who can't reach 14.5 mm of wrist? Which is more elegant?
Enviado desde mi SM-G973F mediante Tapatalk |
28 July 2020, 03:33 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 435
|
Both look great to me, but left is more elegant IMO.
__________________
Rolex: SD 116600 | Submariner 114060 | GMT 126710BLNR | GMT 116710LN | Explorer II 216570 | Explorer 214270 Other: Vacheron Constantin | Panerai | Omega | Grand Seiko | Breitling |
28 July 2020, 03:37 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Maryland
Posts: 323
|
It’s hard to tell because the one on the right isn’t fitted properly on the wrist. The left one looks better, but that could just be since it’s where the watch should be on the wrist. Pictures of the watches on the wrist proper instead of side by side, might give a more conclusive consensus. The left looks more elegant, the right more modern.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
28 July 2020, 03:37 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lower Hudon River
Posts: 112
|
I agree, both look fantastic on a woman's wrist but the smaller one is more refined and elegant.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
28 July 2020, 03:39 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Novato, Ca
Watch: Bluesy Submariner
Posts: 175
|
Smaller one
|
28 July 2020, 03:39 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Jay
Location: England
Watch: SkyD
Posts: 6,398
|
left. even as a heavily set man i feel smaller is smarter. i wear mainly 40's but prefer a 36 with a suit
|
28 July 2020, 03:47 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Simon
Location: Wales
Watch: whichever I wear
Posts: 830
|
__________________
Timing Is Everything Submariner 114060/ Submariner 116613LB/ Daytona 116523/ Omega Seamaster/ Omega De Ville |
28 July 2020, 03:52 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,665
|
Larger one on the right
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”. |
28 July 2020, 03:54 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 847
|
Try a 31mm
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk |
28 July 2020, 04:08 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Gary
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 11,714
|
My petite wife says larger. She wears a new Tudor S&G Chrono on Bund. Also, she finds calling a small watch a “Girls” version insulting. Just the messenger here don’t shoot me
__________________
|
28 July 2020, 04:09 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 63
|
How about this Lady-DateJust (28mm)?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
28 July 2020, 04:22 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,665
|
This is what I’ve heard from lady enthusiast.
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”. |
28 July 2020, 04:43 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 7,076
|
36
|
28 July 2020, 04:47 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Detroit
Watch: 16233
Posts: 790
|
To be fair to OP, he didn't call it a "girl's" version. He said it was a watch for a girl. Who knows, maybe it is for his teenage daughter?
__________________
“Better to have thunk wrong than not thunk at all.” |
28 July 2020, 04:49 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Gary
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 11,714
|
Thanks mate lol, I almost hated to put that out there so fantastic!!
__________________
|
28 July 2020, 04:52 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 7,076
|
I say 36 - keep in mind apple watches or similar start at 38. I know that is needed for the sceen size, but people get used to wearing/seeing that size watch. I think for that reason alone, unless you have very very small arms/wrists, I wouldn’t go lower than 36.
|
28 July 2020, 04:52 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Real Name: Gary
Location: London UK
Watch: 116613LB Bluesy
Posts: 1,066
|
You posted about watch size on your wrist on the 25th what is the fixation with wrist/watch size.
|
28 July 2020, 04:53 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: California
Posts: 1,472
|
Definitely go with the smaller one if you're looking for a more streamlined and elegant look.
|
28 July 2020, 06:52 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,715
|
My petite wife loves her 41mm Tudor Ranger, wears my 42mm Breitling and would rock my Sub and Batman if the bracelet fit. The "dainty" Omega women's watch I bought her 15 years ago hasn't been worn in years. Most of the women at my AD wear men's Rolex.
|
28 July 2020, 07:02 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: US
Watch: Two Tone DJ
Posts: 339
|
Smaller
|
28 July 2020, 07:31 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Georgia
Posts: 6,305
|
I like the bigger one here better. But both look nice.
|
28 July 2020, 08:34 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Gary
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 11,714
|
Good point! When it comes to women, girls, my wife, I’ll just stay out of it...
__________________
|
28 July 2020, 08:54 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Uranus
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 4,789
|
Left
|
28 July 2020, 12:14 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Neal
Location: Point Loma
Watch: ing the river flow
Posts: 2,856
|
Personally I like bigger on women.
__________________
. Sub No Date (14060); Tudor Ranger; Explorer (124270); Day Date (18238) stolen by wife; CasiOak. |
28 July 2020, 12:21 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,543
|
I think right looks slightly larger but not too large and is perfect. Don't go any larger than that. It's a 28 vs 31 right? If so, don't even try go for 36. It'll be way too big.
|
28 July 2020, 12:22 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Katie
Location: Chicago
Watch: DJ 126200
Posts: 42
|
Ii wear a DJ36, Tudor BB58 and a Cartier Tank L. All of my women friends wear similar sized watches with some wearing larger references. The smallest I would consider is 34
|
28 July 2020, 12:30 PM | #27 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,454
|
I like the smaller one, but of course, that would up to the lady in question.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
28 July 2020, 03:04 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
14.5 mm? I think the OP meant cm, which would be about 5.7 inches.
Anyway, up to the girl/lady in question.
__________________
|
28 July 2020, 04:34 PM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
|
Get her the 36mm.
I know heaps of petite women that wear a 36mm and its perfect for them. Any smaller it looks too small even for smaller women. |
28 July 2020, 09:15 PM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,081
|
The bigger one. The smaller one looks outdated IMO.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.