The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 August 2020, 12:30 AM   #1
cbalster
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Hillsborough
Posts: 744
+2/-2 seconds per day

This is the standard for Rolex timepiece accuracy since 2016. Does any other fully automatic movement come close?
cbalster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 12:59 AM   #2
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbalster View Post
This is the standard for Rolex timepiece accuracy since 2016. Does any other fully automatic movement come close?
Well I have a Chinese made Seagull ST manual wind movement total cost was £60 and with very careful regulation got that running to a consistent +2 seconds a day for many years of wearing.And this new average -2+2 seconds is more marketing than anything.The bare uncased movements are still tested at the Swiss COSC to a AVERAGE of -4+6 seconds to get the Swiss chronometer certification.Rolex now further tests movements in there cases many at a time on a machine in a controlled environment to this new -2+2 spec.But on the wrist there are many variables to overcome so the results while testing on a machine could differ slightly to wearing on the wrist.But for any purely mechanical watch to run within a few seconds or little over the Swiss chronometer spec considering there are 86400 seconds in a day is a mechanical marvel.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 06:43 AM   #3
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Well I have a Chinese made Seagull ST manual wind movement total cost was £60 and with very careful regulation got that running to a consistent +2 seconds a day for many years of wearing.And this new average -2+2 seconds is more marketing than anything.The bare uncased movements are still tested at the Swiss COSC to a AVERAGE of -4+6 seconds to get the Swiss chronometer certification.Rolex now further tests movements in there cases many at a time on a machine in a controlled environment to this new -2+2 spec.But on the wrist there are many variables to overcome so the results while testing on a machine could differ slightly to wearing on the wrist.But for any purely mechanical watch to run within a few seconds or little over the Swiss chronometer spec considering there are 86400 seconds in a day is a mechanical marvel.
A marvel indeed
We can't be dismissive of the achievement around the new Rolex accuracy standard though
It's a logistical far cry requiring a great deal of commitment, going from an uncased movement with a 10 second tolerance to a cased up movement with a 4 second tolerance.
Let alone applying that same tolerance to "on the wrist, day to day" performance with the hope of maintaining that accuracy over the long term
It's also a testament to the older 31xx movements which are held to the same tolerance
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 01:03 AM   #4
m j b
"TRF" Member
 
m j b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,221
Sure, my Omega Seamaster is within that spec. I also have another brand which cannot be mentioned here, which has a modified ETA movement and after a bit of fiddling with the regulation, is now within 2 seconds a day.
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date.


Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds...
m j b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 01:17 AM   #5
Juan Luis
2024 Pledge Member
 
Juan Luis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Juan Luis
Location: Dominican Rep.
Watch: Undecided
Posts: 1,368
Almost any watch can be regulated to high standards. But many will lose the adjustments in a short time.
Juan Luis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 01:55 AM   #6
peterskinner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
We are asking too much of a mechanical watch. Rolex make a great product, and they do achieve high levels of precision. But, on the wrist, in a wide variety of situations, they are unlikely to consistently hit the Rolex claim. That’s achieved in a factory, in artificial conditions. If you read the Rolex claims, they never state a guaranteed level of timekeeping on the wrist.....
For real precision, something like a quartz GS at ten seconds a year gives perspective. And it will be achieved. But it lacks the romance of a mechanical device, with all those springs and gears.
peterskinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 11:16 AM   #7
irate.alien
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 102
the real world is a tougher test than a timegrapher (even in six positions)

Quote:
Originally Posted by peterskinner View Post
We are asking too much of a mechanical watch. Rolex make a great product, and they do achieve high levels of precision. But, on the wrist, in a wide variety of situations, they are unlikely to consistently hit the Rolex claim. That’s achieved in a factory, in artificial conditions. If you read the Rolex claims, they never state a guaranteed level of timekeeping on the wrist.....
For real precision, something like a quartz GS at ten seconds a year gives perspective. And it will be achieved. But it lacks the romance of a mechanical device, with all those springs and gears.
Completely agree. All these tests are done on timegraphers, basically in a laboratory. Even if you average +/- 2 seconds across all six positions, wandering around on your wrist all day is another thing entirely.
__________________
Bell & Ross 123; LeCoultre Master Mariner; NOMOS Metro Datum Gangreserve; Omega 145.022-69, 2234.50.00; Rolex 116500-0002; Sinn 104, 856, U1; Grand Seiko SBGN003.
irate.alien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 02:05 AM   #8
Fred48
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Colorado
Posts: 323
I have 15 watches in my collection, from a $500 seiko to a 1948 birth watch to a $7500 Explorer, and they all run close to or better than +/- 2 spd. Self regulation is a wonderful thing.
Fred48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 02:31 AM   #9
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbalster View Post
This is the standard for Rolex timepiece accuracy since 2016. Does any other fully automatic movement come close?
Yes of course, I have several that run better than that
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 03:07 AM   #10
Rado63
"TRF" Member
 
Rado63's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Alan
Location: Northern, CA
Watch: 116334
Posts: 2,215
I own both Omegas and Tagheurs that easily operate in that range. Nothing new in today's mechanical watch world. Supposedly Zenith Defy Labs makes the worlds most accurate mechanical watch accurate within 0.3 seconds per day.
__________________
Rolex 116334 126600 228235
Rado63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 03:10 AM   #11
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbalster View Post
This is the standard for Rolex timepiece accuracy since 2016. Does any other fully automatic movement come close?
Taking into account the consistancy of the many brands of timepieces here, they virtually all do... or should i say CAN if they were regulated accurately.
__________________
__________________

----> Was Great Seeing Everyone At The TRF December 9 Tampa Meetup <----
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=968133

Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school.
www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 03:13 AM   #12
RyanJ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 1,448
Yep. Don't fall for the marketing hype.

Rolex makes great movements but so do many other manufacturers.
RyanJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 03:49 AM   #13
Likestheshiny
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
Yeah, this is less the movement and more the attention to adjusting and regulating the movement.

Note that Rolex went from -4/+6 to -2/+2 without changing the movement.

That said, Rolex still gets credit for making movements that can be tuned to excellent accuracy, for putting in the effort to perform and verify that tuning, and for backing the higher accuracy up in the warranty. Rolex generally isn't seen as much of a trendsetter in the watch space ("Evolution, not revolution), but their five-year warranties and higher accuracy specs definitely impacted the industry and forced others to follow.
Likestheshiny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 06:52 AM   #14
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Likestheshiny View Post
Yeah, this is less the movement and more the attention to adjusting and regulating the movement.

Note that Rolex went from -4/+6 to -2/+2 without changing the movement.

That said, Rolex still gets credit for making movements that can be tuned to excellent accuracy, for putting in the effort to perform and verify that tuning, and for backing the higher accuracy up in the warranty. Rolex generally isn't seen as much of a trendsetter in the watch space ("Evolution, not revolution), but their five-year warranties and higher accuracy specs definitely impacted the industry and forced others to follow.
True in part
But the real truth of the matter is that Rolex actually followed Omega, both in extending service intervals and applied accuracy standards.
It was virtually the equivalent of an arms race between them where Rolex has upped the anti even more
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 04:00 AM   #15
Xerxes77
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
Yes my Hublot with ETA 7750 movement work + 5 sec per month......
This ETA movement’s it’s good to not undervalued because they pass the time tests....
Xerxes77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 04:05 AM   #16
nachopc
2024 Pledge Member
 
nachopc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Nash
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex Only
Posts: 1,579
My 16520 APH Dial 2016 is +- 0,7 spd

Amazing !!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
nachopc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 04:32 AM   #17
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
As others have said, if they're promising it, hold them too it. But its not a big deal today. Any mech watch can come within cosc which is why many brands are moving away from cosc.

Its the swiss watch industry equivalent of certified organic.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 04:35 AM   #18
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,639
I have an ETA in a Hamilton that runs perfectly fine within that spec, consistent at less that +1 a day.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 08:48 AM   #19
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
My Grand Seiko spring drive seems to be doing better than that, fwiw. It is fully automatic as well!!! So far within +/-1 second!!!

__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 10:15 AM   #20
Oceanblue
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NC
Posts: 44
My Omega Seamaster Pro is well within the +2, whereas my Omega Seamaster 300 runs at +5. My Rolex have always run in the same range. No complaints on either front. I like to own two from each brand, and there's always variance from one to the other. Doesn't bother me.
Oceanblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 11:19 AM   #21
BaliBryan
"TRF" Member
 
BaliBryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1680 RED, OP39,PAM
Posts: 192
I have an OP 39 that is exactly spot on since February 3.


Almost 8 months dead accurate
BaliBryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 12:27 PM   #22
Onequik135i
"TRF" Member
 
Onequik135i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,574
My 16710 is -+1 dial up just about since Ridley had it serviced and regulated earlier this year.
__________________
16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170
Onequik135i is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 02:30 PM   #23
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbalster View Post
This is the standard for Rolex timepiece accuracy since 2016. Does any other fully automatic movement come close?
Yep. Grand Seiko VFA (Very Fine Adjusted) mechanical watches were guaranteed to run +2/-2 per day when introduced around 1970.

https://watchesbysjx.com/2018/03/a-d...onometers.html
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 02:42 PM   #24
SparklesMcgraw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 160
My Explorer is a few weeks old and runs +/- 6 seconds per day slow consistently. Gonna leave it for a few months and see if it improves. Not too bothered as it is in a rotation so not worn daily. I had hoped for better brand new out of the box though.
SparklesMcgraw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 07:23 PM   #25
18078pres
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Ohio
Posts: 248
18078 from 1980 serviced in 2010 running plus one since. Daily watch all about careful regulation .
18078pres is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.