The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 August 2020, 05:21 PM   #1
cowboy45
"TRF" Member
 
cowboy45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: US
Posts: 57
Hollow link TT sub/GMT question.

I've got my eye on a nice 16713LN right now, ive always been a fan of the 16613LB. Ive passed on a few good ones because of the hollow center links and now im kicking myself. So for those of you who have owned any of the variants, how do they hold up for daily wear?


Im not necessarily hard on my watches but i also dont want to worry about it if swimming or hitting the gym or whatever the day brings. Or should i shell out the extra bucks for the 6 digit models with the solid center links?

Thanks!

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
cowboy45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 05:45 PM   #2
JSolution
"TRF" Member
 
JSolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Jay
Location: England
Watch: SkyD
Posts: 6,398
I have a 16613 black dial. I wore it most days for about two years. Centre links for scuffed up of course. But it’a kinda like the more hairline scratches you have the less you see. Held up absolutely fine.

I would
Recommend getting the newer model though. The glide lock in its self is worth
It.
JSolution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 06:47 PM   #3
18078pres
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Ohio
Posts: 248
no worries go for it
18078pres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 08:33 PM   #4
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,761
I think it’s a myth that hollow links wear faster compared to the newer solid.
The wear surface is equal and one might argue that the new solid bracelet is heavier resulting in faster wear.

Keeping it clean is key.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 08:41 PM   #5
garyk
2024 Pledge Member
 
garyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Gary
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 11,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSolution View Post
I have a 16613 black dial. I wore it most days for about two years. Centre links for scuffed up of course. But it’a kinda like the more hairline scratches you have the less you see. Held up absolutely fine.

I would
Recommend getting the newer model though. The glide lock in its self is worth
It.
+1 on the glidelock
__________________
garyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2020, 01:49 AM   #6
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboy45 View Post
I've got my eye on a nice 16713LN right now, ive always been a fan of the 16613LB. Ive passed on a few good ones because of the hollow center links and now im kicking myself. So for those of you who have owned any of the variants, how do they hold up for daily wear?
They've been around for 50 years. There are extreme wear examples that we see here from time-to-time, but the vast majority of them are just fine. We see just as many worn out stainless bracelets too.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2020, 03:39 AM   #7
dba
2024 Pledge Member
 
dba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: David
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Watch: 16710
Posts: 2,706
I've had a lot of the 5 digit with the hollow links. Including the one you're interested in. Never a problem with them.
__________________
Current: 16710
Previous: 16760 Fat Lady, 16613 Bluesy, 16800, 14060, 16710 Pepsi, 216570 Polar, 116710LN, 16610, 216570 Polar (again), 16713, 216570 Polar (yet again), 16710 Black w/ Pepsi Insert
Hope is not a strategy.
dba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2020, 04:26 AM   #8
cowboy45
"TRF" Member
 
cowboy45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: US
Posts: 57
Awesome thanks for the input everyone, i think ill go for it. The glide lock is a super nice feature but isnt a make it or break it deal for me, it just means ill have to get more of course

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
cowboy45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2020, 04:41 AM   #9
MrMercedes
"TRF" Member
 
MrMercedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Real Name: David
Location: here and there
Watch: too many!
Posts: 3,588
Have a 16113 myself; it is a perfect watch for everything! Don´t worry and wear it in good health!!
MrMercedes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2020, 08:13 AM   #10
Maiden
"TRF" Member
 
Maiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
I’ve owned a six digit 116613lb and a five digit 16713 ln. No problems with either bracelet. Keep it clean and snug and you are good to go for your lifetime and beyond!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex 116613LN
Rolex 16610LN
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm
Omega Geneve
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112
Orient Ray 2
Maiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.