The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 September 2020, 11:52 PM   #1
JRell
"TRF" Member
 
JRell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 7,076
Sub - was this a refresh or redesign?

So I was thinking. We had the super case for 12 years, and now they slimmed the look of the lugs, widened the bracelet. To some it was a dramatic change, but to me and many watch reviews, it was a subtle change with gradual move away from the super case. Would it be safe to say this is another 10-12 years with the new case? If so, what is next? Probably going back more to the original design. It is all cyclical.

If so, and knowing they they will eventually move completely away from the larger case, I don’t know other that the 70 hour power reserve, how much of an improvement this really was. The change from the previous to the current was minimal, but then the next change will be even more different than the previous 6 digits, so probably worth hanging on to the current subs and seeing where this is really all going in the future.

Not to say I won’t look to get the new bluesy, but I am not sure it makes sense to trade up my 114060. The new will be the old someday! Maybe holding on to the current subs if you have it, and trade when there is a drastic change makes more sense. Both the previous and the current could look much more dated if there is a real redesign. Who knows maybe Rolex won’t wait 12 years. Maybe this was more like a mid-model refresh like they do with cars, before the complete redesign.
JRell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2020, 11:59 PM   #2
Dsmith1974
"TRF" Member
 
Dsmith1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,263
It was a return to form.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dsmith1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2020, 11:59 PM   #3
mykii
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: East
Watch: AP+FPJ+ PP+Rolex
Posts: 1,776
It was a bad refresh. Can't forgive the abandonment of 65+ years of history to become 41mm.
__________________
mykii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:00 AM   #4
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Rolex is not like a car company nor any other. They only make minor tweaks over the years. If you are expecting some sort of radical re-design this likely won't happen with Rolex. The "new" Sub is hardly a big redesign.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:00 AM   #5
Heady Topper
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 321
Was this thread necessary? There are dozen others... Also, how do you know they'll move away from bugger cases? They literally just made it bigger

Sent from my SM-G973W using Tapatalk
Heady Topper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:02 AM   #6
Ranger67
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Real Name: Gary
Location: London UK
Watch: 116613LB Bluesy
Posts: 1,066
I'd say a refresh as changes are reasonably subtle and you have to look hard to notice any difference, i wont be trading my existing Bluesy for one, but have contacted my AD to view the new range whenever its possible as i would like to add a Black face, either KCermit or whatever its reference is, or a Sub date/non date either one will do.
Ranger67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:04 AM   #7
JRell
"TRF" Member
 
JRell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 7,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heady Topper View Post
Was this thread necessary? There are dozen others... Also, how do you know they'll move away from bugger cases? They literally just made it bigger

Sent from my SM-G973W using Tapatalk
I am overthinking it, I know.
JRell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:09 AM   #8
Ranger67
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Real Name: Gary
Location: London UK
Watch: 116613LB Bluesy
Posts: 1,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRell View Post
I am overthinking it, I know.
Doesn't matter, I'm sure most threads are duplicated, just putting your thoughts down is fine, we can all respond or ignore but i have noticed a lot of unnecessary churlish replies.
Ranger67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:10 AM   #9
Seaswirl
"TRF" Member
 
Seaswirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
OP, I think you’re over thinking this. It’s a modest refresh and there will be others. All models eventually get discontinued and replaced with something newer and shinier. The great thing about Rolex is that changes are incremental ensuring that their watches are as relevant today as when they first released it. Accept that there is a newer Sub, but remember that your Sub is still as great a watch as it was last week. Enjoy it!
Seaswirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:10 AM   #10
JRell
"TRF" Member
 
JRell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 7,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger67 View Post
Doesn't matter, I'm sure most threads are duplicated, just putting your thoughts down is fine, we can all respond or ignore but i have noticed a lot of unnecessary churlish replies.
Thanks and I think I will be following your lead with keeping and adding! Appreciate the advice.
JRell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:11 AM   #11
Dsmith1974
"TRF" Member
 
Dsmith1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,263
The next biggest change I would welcome would be cut down the four lines to three or even two.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dsmith1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:11 AM   #12
JRell
"TRF" Member
 
JRell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 7,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaswirl View Post
OP, I think you’re over thinking this. It’s a modest refresh and there will be others. All models eventually get discontinued and replaced with something newer and shinier. The great thing about Rolex is that changes are incremental ensuring that their watches are as relevant today as when they first released it. Accept that there is a newer Sub, but remember that your Sub is still as great a watch as it was last week. Enjoy it!
Thanks man - need this Rolex therapy!
JRell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:12 AM   #13
socalwatchcollector
"TRF" Member
 
socalwatchcollector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: John
Location: newport beach
Watch: Pateks Plural
Posts: 1,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykii View Post
it was a bad refresh. Can't forgive the abandonment of 65+ years of history to become 41mm.
+1
socalwatchcollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:15 AM   #14
zjd168
"TRF" Member
 
zjd168's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykii View Post
It was a bad refresh. Can't forgive the abandonment of 65+ years of history to become 41mm.
it is just name change for marketing, the real difference is about 0.2 mm, and it wasn't 40.00 mm before
zjd168 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:15 AM   #15
just1time
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: toRonTo, oN,
Posts: 595
I swear people going on and on about how the new sub looks better. When to me i almost see no difference. I agree it is a refresh. No significant change in my opinion. Not worth pursuing when I am perfectly ok with the current subs I have.
just1time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:16 AM   #16
just1time
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: toRonTo, oN,
Posts: 595
hey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaswirl View Post
OP, I think you’re over thinking this. It’s a modest refresh and there will be others. All models eventually get discontinued and replaced with something newer and shinier. The great thing about Rolex is that changes are incremental ensuring that their watches are as relevant today as when they first released it. Accept that there is a newer Sub, but remember that your Sub is still as great a watch as it was last week. Enjoy it!
Exactly...well said
just1time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:18 AM   #17
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykii View Post
It was a bad refresh. Can't forgive the abandonment of 65+ years of history to become 41mm.
Depends on what you measuring. The bezel is now 41mm, the case is pretty much same as previous.

Besides, Rolex was NOT always 40mm. It started ay 37mm, then 38mm and so on.
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:23 AM   #18
zjd168
"TRF" Member
 
zjd168's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
most people can't tell the difference so the change is subtle.

I guess the next biggest change people yelling for will be the re-introduce of the RED submarine text line, people will go crazy again, same for the products, both old and new.
zjd168 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:31 AM   #19
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,502
I think that it was genius.

Rolex learned early that their boxy design was not considered aesthetically pleasing to many, myself included.

They have looked at the problem, and come up with a solution that brings back a more pleasing proportion to the human eye.

In art there are rules and guidelines, such as the Golden Proportion, and Rule of Thirds, and so on. The previous ratios of the case to bracelet and dial were not well though out - this has been corrected.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:35 AM   #20
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
A bit of both IMO. I see as an update. A welcome update because now I have two new watches I can plan for the future even though I already own both 11 series.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:46 AM   #21
GBD
"TRF" Member
 
GBD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 442
Small changes, but all together make for a significant improvement. New sub looks way more congruent and harmonious, imo.
GBD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:51 AM   #22
watchmaker
TechXpert
 
watchmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykii View Post
It was a bad refresh. Can't forgive the abandonment of 65+ years of history to become 41mm.
Abandonment of 65+ years of history??

The Submariner wasn't 40mm to start with
watchmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 12:53 AM   #23
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmaker View Post
Abandonment of 65+ years of history??

The Submariner wasn't 40mm to start with
Certainly you must admit an odd # like 41mm is just that....odd.
40mm just works better.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 01:00 AM   #24
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
I think that it was genius.

Rolex learned early that their boxy design was not considered aesthetically pleasing to many, myself included.

They have looked at the problem, and come up with a solution that brings back a more pleasing proportion to the human eye.

In art there are rules and guidelines, such as the Golden Proportion, and Rule of Thirds, and so on. The previous ratios of the case to bracelet and dial were not well though out - this has been corrected.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 01:05 AM   #25
watchmaker
TechXpert
 
watchmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigblu10 View Post
Certainly you must admit an odd # like 41mm is just that....odd.
40mm just works better.
I'll grant you, odd is odd

But I also think it was odd having the de facto 'mens' Datejust be larger than Submariner. So I think it makes sense.
watchmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 01:35 AM   #26
JRell
"TRF" Member
 
JRell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 7,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmaker View Post
I'll grant you, odd is odd

But I also think it was odd having the de facto 'mens' Datejust be larger than Submariner. So I think it makes sense.
I have both the 114060 and datejust 41. The sub looks and feels bigger than the datejust with the super case.
JRell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 01:38 AM   #27
watchmaker
TechXpert
 
watchmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRell View Post
I have both the 114060 and datejust 41. The sub looks and feels bigger than the datejust with the super case.
I know it does, further highlighting the unnecessary use of case diameter as a metric to judge the watch. The number tells you nothing on it's own.

I wear a SD43 as my daily and it does not feel 'huge' as the number might suggest. Case geometry is far more important imo.
watchmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 01:57 AM   #28
Dr. Robert
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,120
Bah humbug, I want a 124060!
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 02:09 AM   #29
Rokoru
"TRF" Member
 
Rokoru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 764
IMHO these changes are really big. New case design, new movement, bigger hands, 41 mm case, wider bracelet. I think this case will be loved by many once we find out that it wears the same or even smaller than the previous 6 digits... I hope to get mine this weekend!
Rokoru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 02:10 AM   #30
Rexplorer214270
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: New England
Watch: All of them
Posts: 549
Won't the Sub still wear the same with the widening of the bracelet?
Rexplorer214270 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.