The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 February 2021, 09:08 PM   #1
Tri-National-Man
"TRF" Member
 
Tri-National-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
Old 16610 for newer 14060m.. Good swap?

Hi forum members.. First post in a while.. Hope you are all keeping safe in these crazy times..
So a possible offer is on the table.. I have an ageing 16610 from 1991.. In goodish shape.. No certificate.. Just for a change, I would like to swap for a 14060.. This one is on offer.. It has a service replacement case so is in excellent shape.. No cert, no bracelet.. Thought about a head only swap.. Good deal or not?
Attached Images
   
Tri-National-Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2021, 10:02 PM   #2
ciceroyeah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tri-National-Man View Post
Hi forum members.. First post in a while.. Hope you are all keeping safe in these crazy times..
So a possible offer is on the table.. I have an ageing 16610 from 1991.. In goodish shape.. No certificate.. Just for a change, I would like to swap for a 14060.. This one is on offer.. It has a service replacement case so is in excellent shape.. No cert, no bracelet.. Thought about a head only swap.. Good deal or not?
Well let's look at what you have and what you'd be getting. You have what is likely an all-original neo-vintage submariner date with original bracelet. You'd be trading it for a possible franken with "service replacement" case which will have mismatched serial and non-original bracelet. IMO terrible idea.
ciceroyeah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2021, 10:09 PM   #3
Paulie 50
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie 50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by ciceroyeah View Post
Well let's look at what you have and what you'd be getting. You have what is likely an all-original neo-vintage submariner date with original bracelet. You'd be trading it for a possible franken with "service replacement" case which will have mismatched serial and non-original bracelet. IMO terrible idea.
Totally agree. To me it's a no brainer; but, it's the OPs decision. Good luck to him and indeed all the members of this fantastic forum. Stay safe.
Paulie 50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2021, 10:35 PM   #4
ciceroyeah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie 50 View Post
Totally agree. To me it's a no brainer; but, it's the OPs decision. Good luck to him and indeed all the members of this fantastic forum. Stay safe.
I don't wish OP good luck because getting lucky when making an obviously terrible decision is how poor decision-making gets reinforced. Though in this case I would say there's no chance of getting lucky since he already knows the watch isn't all-original and is therefore a relatively bad deal.
ciceroyeah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2021, 10:44 PM   #5
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,757
You are joking us
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2021, 11:13 PM   #6
330ci
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: michigan
Posts: 2,343
Even if it were an all original 14060m I couldn’t see myself doing the trade.
330ci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2021, 11:17 PM   #7
Paulie 50
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie 50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by ciceroyeah View Post
I don't wish OP good luck because getting lucky when making an obviously terrible decision is how poor decision-making gets reinforced. Though in this case I would say there's no chance of getting lucky since he already knows the watch isn't all-original and is therefore a relatively bad deal.
I wasn't wishing him good luck regarding this deal, but rather hoping he has better luck in any further search. The man who hasn't made a poor decision once or twice in his life is indeed rare; probably as rare as Rocking Horse Sh..
Stay safe.
Paulie 50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2021, 11:45 PM   #8
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
Terrible deal for you IMO.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2021, 11:51 PM   #9
offrdmania
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
The trader of the 14060M would need to be adding cash to the deal for it to be an even trade.
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 12:25 AM   #10
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,999
The OP’s key phrase is “just for a change.” I’ve found that can be the worst reason to sell/swap a watch, assuming the watch is a good one to begin with. I’ve done it several times out of boredom and months/years later I regret it.

The 16610 is a classic, especially if it’s all original. The 14060 being considered doesn’t seem to be a good example. My suggestion is if you’re bored with a watch, put it away for six months. Don’t even look at it. Wear something else in the meantime, even if it’s a G-Shock. When you pull that old Sub back out of storage, I bet you’ll be happy you kept it. That’s been my experience anyway.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 12:42 AM   #11
Tri-National-Man
"TRF" Member
 
Tri-National-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
Thanks for the feedback guys.. Yeah a bit more digging on the 14060 revealed it was a complete frankensub.. So the service case was stamped 14060.. (not M) but dial was a later “ Swiss made” but movement was a cal3000.. Too many anomalies for me..
But seriously though, aren’t good 14060Ms exchanging for same money as 16610s now?
Tri-National-Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 12:49 AM   #12
cm70
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: cagliari
Posts: 132
I would not do that ...
I am telling you as a Submariner collector ... your Sub is better
cm70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 12:49 AM   #13
Styles Bitchley
"TRF" Member
 
Styles Bitchley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,398
I think you’d have some big regrets with such a deal. I’d certainly miss the date, but that’s another discussion. Tuck it away and come back to it.
Styles Bitchley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 01:51 AM   #14
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by ciceroyeah View Post
Well let's look at what you have and what you'd be getting. You have what is likely an all-original neo-vintage submariner date with original bracelet. You'd be trading it for a possible franken with "service replacement" case which will have mismatched serial and non-original bracelet. IMO terrible idea.
X2.. good idea, at least I prefer a no date but not for this one..

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 02:11 AM   #15
ciceroyeah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tri-National-Man View Post
Thanks for the feedback guys.. Yeah a bit more digging on the 14060 revealed it was a complete frankensub.. So the service case was stamped 14060.. (not M) but dial was a later “ Swiss made” but movement was a cal3000.. Too many anomalies for me..
But seriously though, aren’t good 14060Ms exchanging for same money as 16610s now?
I would recommend keeping your date sub and if you like a no-date just buy another one that's intact and with box + papers if possible. You might even make some money if you eventually resell it and prices keep rising. There are a lot of trustworthy vintage dealers on Rolexforums including Recaro18 (Crown in Oyster Case), vintagerlx, craft&tailored, tjbender (Fog City Vintage), b.wayne (Grey and Patina) etc. etc. etc. Their instagram accounts and websites typically feature the most up-to-date stock.
ciceroyeah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 02:30 AM   #16
Tri-National-Man
"TRF" Member
 
Tri-National-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
Just to update you guys.. I AM NOT doing the deal for the reasons I listed in my last post..
Thank you for your advice and feedback..��
Tri-National-Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 03:23 AM   #17
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
If you feel the need to trade your classic Submariner for a 14060, at least find a 14060 that has the original case, dial/hands, bracelet etc. and not a service parts example. You'll be much happier in the long run - especially when you get ready to trade the 14060 for something else.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 03:58 AM   #18
lhendrickson
"TRF" Member
 
lhendrickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Luke
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 1972 ref. 1601
Posts: 126
What I think has already been said above (service case, mixed bits – OP addressed this, too). Were the 14060M totally kosher, I would perhaps entertain the trade. Pricing is seemingly equivalent right now however one big thing for me would be the loss of the date function. Personally, I use that every day with my 1601 and wouldn't want to lose out on it. I've actually been eyeing 16610s for that very reason after being on the hunt for some nice 14060s and 14060Ms.
lhendrickson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 04:19 AM   #19
Jackie Daytona
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Jackie Daytona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Brian
Location: Nashville
Watch: 16750
Posts: 6,618
Why not just play with the sub you have rather than trade? It’s your watch to do as you please. Put it on a nato of some sort, remove the cyclops you have what you were looking to trade for basically, and you know the watch already.
__________________
16750 | 6516(wife’s) | 126334 | 16570 | SBGA413 | SRPE33 | 126610LV
Jackie Daytona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 04:28 AM   #20
SLS
"TRF" Member
 
SLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
Pass, pass, pass...Horrible deal for you.
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin

Member No. 922
SLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 06:09 AM   #21
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
I would never do it.
Are 16610 - 14060 - 14060M considered vintage?
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 09:23 PM   #22
Tri-National-Man
"TRF" Member
 
Tri-National-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by doramas View Post
I would never do it.
Are 16610 - 14060 - 14060M considered vintage?
“Neo vintage” I think is the term for these sapphire/aluminium bezel models now
Tri-National-Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 10:16 PM   #23
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tri-National-Man View Post
“Neo vintage” I think is the term for these sapphire/aluminium bezel models now
I like the new term.
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 10:24 PM   #24
athom
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 688
swaping a 11610 for a 14060 is for me a good idea since I prefer the sub compared to the sub date...but it would have to be a perfect one...
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master 1675 BLRO | Rolex Submariner 1680 RED | Rolex Submariner 5513 MF | Rolex Submariner 114060 | Omega Ω Speedmaster 105.012
athom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 10:33 PM   #25
Gerardus
"TRF" Member
 
Gerardus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
Bad deal IMHO
__________________

♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300
Gerardus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 11:48 PM   #26
Golfbone
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 700
So many have made it clear that this is a terrible trade for you to consider that my thoughts are just piling on at this point. It is a terrible trade for you. You have the better watch by far in your own hands. My advice would be to keep it.
Golfbone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2021, 12:28 AM   #27
Marcjvr
"TRF" Member
 
Marcjvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Southeast
Watch: 214270
Posts: 2,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tri-National-Man View Post
Hi forum members.. First post in a while.. Hope you are all keeping safe in these crazy times..
So a possible offer is on the table.. I have an ageing 16610 from 1991.. In goodish shape.. No certificate.. Just for a change, I would like to swap for a 14060.. This one is on offer.. It has a service replacement case so is in excellent shape.. No cert, no bracelet.. Thought about a head only swap.. Good deal or not?
Just so I am clear, what is this “certificate” you keep mentioning?
Marcjvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2021, 12:29 AM   #28
PepsiBezel
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
PepsiBezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,212
The service case is sort of the watch collecting version of buying a car with a rebuilt title...
PepsiBezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2021, 01:18 AM   #29
scousejames
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 98
I'm still a newbie to the Rolex world, and can offer no advice on the trade.
But just curious as to why a service case is so frowned upon?
I do understand that most prefer to have the watch as it were from the factory, but on the flip side, I see a lot of posts about over polished cases on the 5 digits, so with a service case, would that not be like having a "brand new" 5 digit watch?
scousejames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2021, 03:38 AM   #30
Brny11
"TRF" Member
 
Brny11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,460
16610 for 14060 is a good idea. Your 16610 for a franken-14060 is a terrible idea. Keep searching.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Brny11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.