ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 February 2021, 09:08 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
Old 16610 for newer 14060m.. Good swap?
Hi forum members.. First post in a while.. Hope you are all keeping safe in these crazy times..
So a possible offer is on the table.. I have an ageing 16610 from 1991.. In goodish shape.. No certificate.. Just for a change, I would like to swap for a 14060.. This one is on offer.. It has a service replacement case so is in excellent shape.. No cert, no bracelet.. Thought about a head only swap.. Good deal or not? |
13 February 2021, 10:02 PM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
|
|
13 February 2021, 10:09 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 1,000
|
Quote:
|
|
13 February 2021, 10:35 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 243
|
I don't wish OP good luck because getting lucky when making an obviously terrible decision is how poor decision-making gets reinforced. Though in this case I would say there's no chance of getting lucky since he already knows the watch isn't all-original and is therefore a relatively bad deal.
|
13 February 2021, 10:44 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,757
|
You are joking us
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
13 February 2021, 11:13 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: michigan
Posts: 2,343
|
Even if it were an all original 14060m I couldn’t see myself doing the trade.
|
13 February 2021, 11:17 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 1,000
|
Quote:
Stay safe. |
|
13 February 2021, 11:45 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
|
Terrible deal for you IMO.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
13 February 2021, 11:51 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
|
The trader of the 14060M would need to be adding cash to the deal for it to be an even trade.
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
14 February 2021, 12:25 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,999
|
The OP’s key phrase is “just for a change.” I’ve found that can be the worst reason to sell/swap a watch, assuming the watch is a good one to begin with. I’ve done it several times out of boredom and months/years later I regret it.
The 16610 is a classic, especially if it’s all original. The 14060 being considered doesn’t seem to be a good example. My suggestion is if you’re bored with a watch, put it away for six months. Don’t even look at it. Wear something else in the meantime, even if it’s a G-Shock. When you pull that old Sub back out of storage, I bet you’ll be happy you kept it. That’s been my experience anyway. |
14 February 2021, 12:42 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
Thanks for the feedback guys.. Yeah a bit more digging on the 14060 revealed it was a complete frankensub.. So the service case was stamped 14060.. (not M) but dial was a later “ Swiss made” but movement was a cal3000.. Too many anomalies for me..
But seriously though, aren’t good 14060Ms exchanging for same money as 16610s now? |
14 February 2021, 12:49 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: cagliari
Posts: 132
|
I would not do that ...
I am telling you as a Submariner collector ... your Sub is better |
14 February 2021, 12:49 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,398
|
I think you’d have some big regrets with such a deal. I’d certainly miss the date, but that’s another discussion. Tuck it away and come back to it.
|
14 February 2021, 01:51 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk |
|
14 February 2021, 02:11 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
|
|
14 February 2021, 02:30 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
Just to update you guys.. I AM NOT doing the deal for the reasons I listed in my last post..
Thank you for your advice and feedback.. |
14 February 2021, 03:23 AM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
If you feel the need to trade your classic Submariner for a 14060, at least find a 14060 that has the original case, dial/hands, bracelet etc. and not a service parts example. You'll be much happier in the long run - especially when you get ready to trade the 14060 for something else.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
14 February 2021, 03:58 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Luke
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 1972 ref. 1601
Posts: 126
|
What I think has already been said above (service case, mixed bits – OP addressed this, too). Were the 14060M totally kosher, I would perhaps entertain the trade. Pricing is seemingly equivalent right now however one big thing for me would be the loss of the date function. Personally, I use that every day with my 1601 and wouldn't want to lose out on it. I've actually been eyeing 16610s for that very reason after being on the hunt for some nice 14060s and 14060Ms.
|
14 February 2021, 04:19 AM | #19 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Brian
Location: Nashville
Watch: 16750
Posts: 6,618
|
Why not just play with the sub you have rather than trade? It’s your watch to do as you please. Put it on a nato of some sort, remove the cyclops you have what you were looking to trade for basically, and you know the watch already.
__________________
16750 | 6516(wife’s) | 126334 | 16570 | SBGA413 | SRPE33 | 126610LV |
14 February 2021, 04:28 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
Pass, pass, pass...Horrible deal for you.
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
14 February 2021, 06:09 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
I would never do it.
Are 16610 - 14060 - 14060M considered vintage? |
14 February 2021, 09:23 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
|
14 February 2021, 10:16 PM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
|
14 February 2021, 10:24 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 688
|
swaping a 11610 for a 14060 is for me a good idea since I prefer the sub compared to the sub date...but it would have to be a perfect one...
__________________
Rolex ♛ GMT-Master 1675 BLRO | Rolex ♛ Submariner 1680 RED | Rolex ♛ Submariner 5513 MF | Rolex ♛ Submariner 114060 | Omega Ω Speedmaster 105.012 |
14 February 2021, 10:33 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
|
Bad deal IMHO
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
14 February 2021, 11:48 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 700
|
So many have made it clear that this is a terrible trade for you to consider that my thoughts are just piling on at this point. It is a terrible trade for you. You have the better watch by far in your own hands. My advice would be to keep it.
|
15 February 2021, 12:28 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Southeast
Watch: 214270
Posts: 2,749
|
Quote:
|
|
15 February 2021, 12:29 AM | #28 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,212
|
The service case is sort of the watch collecting version of buying a car with a rebuilt title...
|
15 February 2021, 01:18 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 98
|
I'm still a newbie to the Rolex world, and can offer no advice on the trade.
But just curious as to why a service case is so frowned upon? I do understand that most prefer to have the watch as it were from the factory, but on the flip side, I see a lot of posts about over polished cases on the 5 digits, so with a service case, would that not be like having a "brand new" 5 digit watch? |
15 February 2021, 03:38 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,460
|
16610 for 14060 is a good idea. Your 16610 for a franken-14060 is a terrible idea. Keep searching.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.