The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 February 2021, 11:38 AM   #1
thsiao
"TRF" Member
 
thsiao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,248
Icon5 At what point is a piece considered “vintage”?

At what point is a piece considered “vintage”?

I have a DJ36 from 2006 which come to think about it is going to be 15 years old this year... looks very modern still and in perfect condition. Not vintage I suppose?
__________________
Instagram @lifeofawis
www.lifeofawis.com
thsiao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 11:48 AM   #2
arcadelt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Monaro, NSW
Posts: 846
At what point is a piece considered “vintage”?

Quote:
Originally Posted by thsiao View Post
At what point is a piece considered “vintage”?
Most things are considered vintage when they are 50 years old, but the general consensus for watches is 20 years...unless it is a Breitling where the Breitling collector community has decided that vintage is anything before 1979.
arcadelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 11:52 AM   #3
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by thsiao View Post
Not vintage I suppose?
Nope. Not yet.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 11:59 AM   #4
watchmavan
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
Agreed. Watches generally it's 20 years. I call my 20 year olds neo-vintage and just vintage at 25.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
watchmavan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 02:04 PM   #5
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: Many
Posts: 3,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcadelt View Post
Most things are considered vintage when they are 50 years old, but the general consensus for watches is 20 years...unless it is a Breitling where the Breitling collector community has decided that vintage is anything before 1979.
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmavan View Post
Agreed. Watches generally it's 20 years. I call my 20 year olds neo-vintage and just vintage at 25.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
No way is a Rolex from 2001 vintage. Nor even one from 1996.

As for the question of when, it’d be best to ask how many times has this question been asked here. There’s a massive collection of threads on the topic that you can search out.
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 03:11 PM   #6
watchmavan
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
No way is a Rolex from 2001 vintage. Nor even one from 1996.



As for the question of when, it’d be best to ask how many times has this question been asked here. There’s a massive collection of threads on the topic that you can search out.


Yes, both here on the forums and on the broader internet. And you'll find many references to 20 years, discontinued models, 5 digit Rolex references etc. Your opinion is different, not necessarily right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
watchmavan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 10:43 PM   #7
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: Many
Posts: 3,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmavan View Post
Yes, both here on the forums and on the broader internet. And you'll find many references to 20 years, discontinued models, 5 digit Rolex references etc. Your opinion is different, not necessarily right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Fair enough. But show me evidence of a consensus that a watch from 2001 (20 years ago) is regarded as “vintage”
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2021, 01:24 AM   #8
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
Fair enough. But show me evidence of a consensus that a watch from 2001 (20 years ago) is regarded as “vintage”
Since vintage has no precise meaning, members are allowed to call their 20 year-old watches vintage if they choose, and the rest of us are allowed to roll our eyes about it.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2021, 08:39 AM   #9
watchmavan
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
Fair enough. But show me evidence of a consensus that a watch from 2001 (20 years ago) is regarded as “vintage”


So in your first post you told someone to go and look in the forums for verification of what vintage is. Ive done that many times over the years as the lack of uniformity is something that annoys me slightly. So I'd say you take your own advice rather than me doing it again for you. Wanting me to provide it for you digests you haven't done it yourself prior to your offsetting of advice, so I will say that there isn't a consensus at this point. There are general views that support 20+ years and those that day 50. There are also many listing supporting the other points I issued.

Personally, I own watches from the 60's through to modern day pieces so this has always been of interest to me. But without consensus, it will also remain my opinion. It is however an opinion shared by many others and documented in the forums, Facebook user groups and the broader internet. I would also say that 20 years on its own is not enough for me though. It would also need to be a discontinued model and have features that are no longer available in current models. My Explorer II fits these criteria on all these and as 2020 I began referring to it as neo-vintage. I'll probably change that to vintage if Rolex bring out another new Explorer this year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
watchmavan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2021, 03:02 AM   #10
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmavan View Post
Yes, both here on the forums and on the broader internet. And you'll find many references to 20 years, discontinued models, 5 digit Rolex references etc. Your opinion is different, not necessarily right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I would disagree with your analysis on what is vintage. Being on the internet is not synonymous with being accurate or correct.

A 20-year-old discontinued model would be considered a classic but not within the parameters of vintage. If you view some previous threads here on TRF concerning the vintage question, there are some good perspectives in many of the responses on what is vintage.

And, a question for the OP, what difference does it make if a watch is called vintage? Nothing magical or mystical happens to a watch because it is considered or called vintage. The only thing mystical about vintage is the desire to call one's watch vintage.

jP
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 12:07 PM   #11
upsidedownbelt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Watch: 116618LB
Posts: 573
25 years for me.
upsidedownbelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 12:11 PM   #12
Aferrariguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 56
I don’t look at it solely based on the year, but mostly the reference. What if it’s the same reference as a 25 year old watch, but the very end of the production?
Aferrariguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 02:08 PM   #13
Stan Cooper
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Stan Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Stan Cooper
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 2,889
As a general rule for Rolexes, I use the switch from acrylic to sapphire crystals as a guide for what's vintage and what's not. That historic reference point will change with time.
__________________
♛16710 GMT-Master II, ♛1915 Rolex WW1 Trench Watch, Zelos Thresher 500m GMT Meteorite, Zelos Swordfish 40 200m Ti Blood Moon Meteorite, Hamilton Pilot Chronograph, Ball Roadmaster Pilot GMT COSC Chronometer, Zelos Mako 300M Traveler GMT Meteorite, Seiko SSC813 quartz solar powered chronograph
It's weird being the same age as old people.

- Stan
Stan Cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 02:10 PM   #14
arcadelt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Monaro, NSW
Posts: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Cooper View Post
As a general rule for Rolexes, I use the switch from acrylic to sapphire crystals as a guide for what's vintage and what's not. That historic reference point will change with time.

When did that happen @Stan Cooper?
arcadelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2021, 12:58 AM   #15
Stan Cooper
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Stan Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Stan Cooper
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 2,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcadelt View Post
When did that happen @Stan Cooper?
Using the GMT Master as an example, the switch to sapphire occurred in 1983 with the introduction of the GMT Master II Ref. 16760 "fat lady." The year of the switch differed with the model, but generally it would have been in the mid-1980s.

I'm 78, so to me 35 years ago is relatively recent.
__________________
♛16710 GMT-Master II, ♛1915 Rolex WW1 Trench Watch, Zelos Thresher 500m GMT Meteorite, Zelos Swordfish 40 200m Ti Blood Moon Meteorite, Hamilton Pilot Chronograph, Ball Roadmaster Pilot GMT COSC Chronometer, Zelos Mako 300M Traveler GMT Meteorite, Seiko SSC813 quartz solar powered chronograph
It's weird being the same age as old people.

- Stan
Stan Cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 03:28 PM   #16
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by thsiao View Post
At what point is a piece considered “vintage”?

I have a DJ36 from 2006 which come to think about it is going to be 15 years old this year... looks very modern still and in perfect condition. Not vintage I suppose?
I would agree with your "I suppose" if it means it is not vintage.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 04:16 PM   #17
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
JP, that looks like an Indian Larry bike!

I’m turning 48 in a couple of days, and I consider myself vintage. I keep poor time, I have a lot of stretch, and my face has plexi.
harry in montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 06:24 PM   #18
swaini3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Mo
Location: Dubai
Watch: 1675 GMT, DRSD
Posts: 1,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry in montreal View Post
JP, that looks like an Indian Larry bike!

I’m turning 48 in a couple of days, and I consider myself vintage. I keep poor time, I have a lot of stretch, and my face has plexi.
swaini3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2021, 03:05 AM   #19
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry in montreal View Post
JP, that looks like an Indian Larry bike!

I’m turning 48 in a couple of days, and I consider myself vintage. I keep poor time, I have a lot of stretch, and my face has plexi.
It was built by Jeff McCann, a very well known chopper builder from Oakland who happened to be a personal friend and painter for Arlen Ness. He passed away about five years ago.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2021, 03:16 AM   #20
watchmavan
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
It was built by Jeff McCann, a very well known chopper builder from Oakland who happened to be a personal friend and painter for Arlen Ness. He passed away about five years ago.


Yes. I can see your view, but like mine and everyone else's, it's just your opinion. As I said, there is no consensus it appears on this and the internet via user groups does lend itself to the most accurate views of users, as you've used to express your own view. This is an area so devoid of consensus that I would challenge anyone to present a correct view. I've been after one for 15 years.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
watchmavan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2021, 02:59 AM   #21
Nickn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: London
Posts: 526
Acrylic = vintage in my opinion
Nickn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2021, 08:41 AM   #22
watchmavan
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
At what point is a piece considered “vintage”?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickn View Post
Acrylic = vintage in my opinion


Current day Speedy Hesalite!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
watchmavan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2021, 08:54 AM   #23
ciceroyeah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmavan View Post
Current day Speedy Hesalite!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I think it's more brand-specific. Each brand made incremental improvements at different times. AP and Patek, for example, were using sapphire long before Rolex started to, while brands like Tudor, Omega and others have contemporary throwback models that harken back to earlier technological limits and specifications and do not represent their cutting edge anymore.
ciceroyeah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2021, 03:20 AM   #24
Nickn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: London
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmavan View Post
Current day Speedy Hesalite!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
That’s a classic not a vintage that only comes with age
Nickn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2021, 04:30 AM   #25
Paulie 50
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie 50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 1,000
4 Digit, plastic glass.
Paulie 50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2021, 08:53 AM   #26
GST15
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: USA
Watch: CHNR/YM/DJ/OP/SUB
Posts: 1,972
Name:  Rolex DJ TT.jpeg
Views: 45
Size:  69.6 KB 1978- Probably Vintage

Name:  Rolex DJ 36 Wrist 2.jpeg
Views: 47
Size:  128.4 KB. 1999- Probably Not

JMHO
GST15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2021, 04:26 AM   #27
ciceroyeah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by thsiao View Post
At what point is a piece considered “vintage”?

I have a DJ36 from 2006 which come to think about it is going to be 15 years old this year... looks very modern still and in perfect condition. Not vintage I suppose?
Personally, I use the tritium boundary to distinguish the "modern" and "neo vintage" eras, and both of which are subsequent to the "painted hour markers" epoch which defines the entirety of the Vintage era when all the coolest shit happened (Bond, legitimate use by military and professional divers, frequent appearances in hollywood movies etc.).

Modern watches use light-absorbing lumen as a dial illuminator rather than radioactive isotopes, and therefore the dial, if in NOS condition, will appear as new indefinitely. Premodern tritium/radium decay will inevitably eliminate dial luminosity and leave the hour markers a shade of cream or orange/brown.

Simplified:

pre 1984 (before the introduction of both solid gold surrounds on SS submariner dials with sapphire crystals) = vintage
1984-1997 tritium = neo-vintage/transitional
1997-2010 = modern aluminum
2010 = modern ceramic

There are some weird outlier transitional pieces that fall into multiple camps.
ciceroyeah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2021, 05:24 AM   #28
MrChamfers
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA!!
Watch: ing Warriors ball
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by ciceroyeah View Post
Personally, I use the tritium boundary to distinguish the "modern" and "neo vintage" eras, and both of which are subsequent to the "painted hour markers" epoch which defines the entirety of the Vintage era when all the coolest shit happened (Bond, legitimate use by military and professional divers, frequent appearances in hollywood movies etc.).

Modern watches use light-absorbing lumen as a dial illuminator rather than radioactive isotopes, and therefore the dial, if in NOS condition, will appear as new indefinitely. Premodern tritium/radium decay will inevitably eliminate dial luminosity and leave the hour markers a shade of cream or orange/brown.

Simplified:

pre 1984 (before the introduction of both solid gold surrounds on SS submariner dials with sapphire crystals) = vintage
1984-1997 tritium = neo-vintage/transitional
1997-2010 = modern aluminum
2010 = modern ceramic

There are some weird outlier transitional pieces that fall into multiple camps.
Very well said.
MrChamfers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2021, 05:19 AM   #29
SunTzu
"TRF" Member
 
SunTzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: NJ
Watch: 5513 116234 79280P
Posts: 2,144
I've always wanted to know the answer to this question.

I'm shocked nobody has ever asked it here before.
__________________
The wristwatch is an intimate accessory. The best watches live in harmony and interact with the wearer, and their functions offer a reassuring and emotionally satisfying bond - Kintaro Hattori
SunTzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2021, 05:34 AM   #30
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,918
It's amazing that the world of Rolex watch collectors has not yet agreed on an accepted defintion for Vintage.
So I better don't ask what the difference between Vintage and Classic is, the latter one also used by Rolex.
Could the used terms be linked with the movement series instead of years?
saxo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.