ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 August 2005, 05:57 PM | #1 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
This one's for Dennis (Maverick)!!
Hi Dennis,
As requested by you in your PM to me, here's the list of weights and dimensions of the Rolex sports models. Cheers - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
4 August 2005, 08:14 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Bolton, UK.
Watch: Daytona 116520
Posts: 6,844
|
Why don't you post a copy of the info in the resources forum?
__________________
A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.........Segal's Law Member #10 |
4 August 2005, 08:34 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,045
|
Yes JJ its all useful information
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
4 August 2005, 08:56 PM | #4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes, very useful, especially if you are looking for missing grams.........
|
4 August 2005, 10:44 PM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,955
|
I hate to ask this, but how do these posted measurements compare to the one you currently own, albeit fleetingly?
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular. Tosser Cabinet Member Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
4 August 2005, 10:46 PM | #6 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
4 August 2005, 11:10 PM | #7 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,955
|
Quote:
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular. Tosser Cabinet Member Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
|
5 August 2005, 12:22 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Who Me?
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: out
Posts: 4,616
|
but, in the true balance of it all, what is the differance of a silly mm or gram cracker?
|
5 August 2005, 12:25 AM | #9 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,955
|
Quote:
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular. Tosser Cabinet Member Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
|
5 August 2005, 03:22 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: maverick
Location: Prescott
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,180
|
Rolex Watch Weight
Thanks JJ, My YM and TT Sub both feel much heavier than the GMT II. I was curious as to how much difference there is. The GMT II is a real sleeper, it is getting a lot of wrist time. =) maverick
|
5 August 2005, 04:22 AM | #11 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Okay, I've just got up and gone through this thread. Some of you tossers as usual have had your laughs but I can point out that the above measurements are accurate in most cases.
The SD actually weighs in at 148 grams (but shows up as 147 in the above chart). The biggest discrepancy is in the Exp-II case diameter which is in reality 39 mm and nowhere even close to 40 mm. I've said this before and I've measured it using a very accurate engineer's ruler. The GMT-II does come up to 40 mm as do the other sports Rollies. Weight of SS/Pt. YM is 146 grams which is exactly the same as the TT YM, also 146 grams. What the TT version loses out in hollow centre links, the Pt. version makes up in that department. But then the links in the TT being gold which is heavier than steel, compensates somehow and both versions come up with the same weight. Cheers - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.