ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 August 2021, 08:29 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
|
Submariner 5512
Hi, hope this message finds you well. I am new to this forum and I hope you can help me see if this watch is original(or had parts replaced). A watchmaker who used to work for a Rolex AD in my home country bought this watch a long time ago and offered it to me. He has shown me his tools and is very familiar on movements etc. He has this 5512 which he says is all original. The movement is engraved as 1530 and doesn’t have a COSC certification, the serial number is 47XXXX. The main issue I have with it is the lack of eagles beak and ring around minute markers. He replaced the bezel insert and hands for aesthetic purposes but the original are included. Hope you can help me with the pictures I attach, thanks in advance.
|
22 August 2021, 09:20 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
|
Others will chime in here but initial view is it doesn't look encouraging.
My thoughts: - Serial would place it in eagle beak as you say. The case looks aftermarket to me. Serial / engraving doesn't look right - Dial not gilt / chapter ring style. Can't be certain if its genuine with that picture - could it be just a standard MF dial? can't be sure - the removed bezel insert might be genuine - the one on the watch is likely aftermarket Again, others will chime in but I suggest taking extreme caution at this point. |
22 August 2021, 09:52 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
|
Thanks for the answer, I guessed it wasn't all original. Maybe the watch was recased at some point? What other pictures would you need to further help me, if its not a big trouble.
|
22 August 2021, 11:44 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
The engraving is all upside down I believe. The printing goes above the model number.
The only part i like is that nice long 5 insert that was removed |
22 August 2021, 12:00 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: 5508 & 9401
Posts: 641
|
^no for early 5512's the engraving goes beneath the model number if I remember correctly.
|
22 August 2021, 12:19 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
|
lets use these ones as an example - also 47XXXXX serial.
Compare against OP's case, dont love: 1) engraving typography 2) no eagle beak https://www.hqmilton.com/timepieces/...-pcg-case-A761 https://www.hqmilton.com/timepieces/...-bracelet-9436 |
22 August 2021, 12:31 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
|
The Case back is stamped III.5X (cant read it). The spacing does not correspond with those seen in HQ. The "5512" is stamped much lower, resembling later models. I also just noticed that the lower crown guard is smaller than the one on top.
|
22 August 2021, 01:59 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
|
Very suspicious, completely different engraving
also the case looks very new on the serial side compare to the reference side |
22 August 2021, 04:11 PM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,874
|
Are you sure it's not a 4.7M serial? That would indicate a service replacement case.
|
22 August 2021, 06:17 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,133
|
Either fake or renumbered IMHO
|
22 August 2021, 08:28 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
|
|
22 August 2021, 11:47 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
|
|
23 August 2021, 12:09 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,999
|
Why even consider the watch at this point? Way too many apparent issues. Big pass!
|
23 August 2021, 12:16 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
|
|
23 August 2021, 01:48 AM | #15 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
|
Quote:
TBH, it requires a lot of experience to evaluate pieces like this, and to know which parts are legitimate for use or re-sale and which parts are fake and should not be re-sold by an honest seller. Unfortunately, I feel that you may be jumping into the deep end. But good luck to you.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
|
23 August 2021, 07:58 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jim
Location: miami
Watch: GMT II 16760
Posts: 1,676
|
According to the HQ Milton link that serial is for a 59 watch which should have a Swiss only dial and not a T Swiss T dial. So it looks like a service dial.
That plus the other concerns equals run Forest run. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
23 August 2021, 08:15 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
|
Quote:
I think you might be getting the digits mixed up here. Service cases generally are 4,4XX,XXX (and not 4,7XX,XXX anyway) OP's case is 47X,XXX So its not trying to be a service case. |
|
23 August 2021, 08:22 AM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA!!
Watch: ing Warriors ball
Posts: 710
|
If it is only a couple grand, then why not buy it for the case, movement, dial etc? Well worth it.
|
23 August 2021, 08:31 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
|
Thanks for all of the input everyone. Didn't expect that much feedback so quick.
|
23 August 2021, 08:57 AM | #20 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: Many
Posts: 3,462
|
Quote:
As Swish mentioned earlier, pass. |
|
23 August 2021, 09:46 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
|
Quote:
|
|
23 August 2021, 09:51 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Yes sure, I know that service cases starts with 4.4XX.XXX, but this is not what I meant, just for discussion let me explain better: Could be an attempt to make it 4.7XX.XXX and not 47X.XXX or there is not enough space? |
|
23 August 2021, 09:53 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
|
Quote:
Engraving in caseback is III.59 Last edited by franzumb; 23 August 2021 at 10:00 AM.. Reason: Added another picture |
|
23 August 2021, 09:55 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
|
Quote:
|
|
23 August 2021, 09:57 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
|
|
23 August 2021, 10:09 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
|
|
24 August 2021, 04:47 AM | #27 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,874
|
Quote:
The font on late service cases is definitely different, but early service cases could have a 70s font. Anyway, looking closer at the pictures it is probably six digits. |
|
24 August 2021, 05:49 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,061
|
this is not a service case, it's a fake case. Dial is unattractive but looks OK from these images.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.