The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 August 2021, 08:29 AM   #1
franzumb
"TRF" Member
 
franzumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
Submariner 5512

Hi, hope this message finds you well. I am new to this forum and I hope you can help me see if this watch is original(or had parts replaced). A watchmaker who used to work for a Rolex AD in my home country bought this watch a long time ago and offered it to me. He has shown me his tools and is very familiar on movements etc. He has this 5512 which he says is all original. The movement is engraved as 1530 and doesn’t have a COSC certification, the serial number is 47XXXX. The main issue I have with it is the lack of eagles beak and ring around minute markers. He replaced the bezel insert and hands for aesthetic purposes but the original are included. Hope you can help me with the pictures I attach, thanks in advance.
Attached Images
           
franzumb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2021, 09:20 AM   #2
alwayshere
"TRF" Member
 
alwayshere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
Others will chime in here but initial view is it doesn't look encouraging.

My thoughts:
- Serial would place it in eagle beak as you say. The case looks aftermarket to me. Serial / engraving doesn't look right
- Dial not gilt / chapter ring style. Can't be certain if its genuine with that picture - could it be just a standard MF dial? can't be sure
- the removed bezel insert might be genuine - the one on the watch is likely aftermarket

Again, others will chime in but I suggest taking extreme caution at this point.
alwayshere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2021, 09:52 AM   #3
franzumb
"TRF" Member
 
franzumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
Thanks for the answer, I guessed it wasn't all original. Maybe the watch was recased at some point? What other pictures would you need to further help me, if its not a big trouble.
franzumb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2021, 11:44 AM   #4
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
The engraving is all upside down I believe. The printing goes above the model number.
The only part i like is that nice long 5 insert that was removed
harry in montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2021, 12:00 PM   #5
Juhuatai
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: 5508 & 9401
Posts: 641
^no for early 5512's the engraving goes beneath the model number if I remember correctly.
Juhuatai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2021, 12:19 PM   #6
alwayshere
"TRF" Member
 
alwayshere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
lets use these ones as an example - also 47XXXXX serial.

Compare against OP's case, dont love:

1) engraving typography
2) no eagle beak

https://www.hqmilton.com/timepieces/...-pcg-case-A761

https://www.hqmilton.com/timepieces/...-bracelet-9436
alwayshere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2021, 12:31 PM   #7
franzumb
"TRF" Member
 
franzumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
The Case back is stamped III.5X (cant read it). The spacing does not correspond with those seen in HQ. The "5512" is stamped much lower, resembling later models. I also just noticed that the lower crown guard is smaller than the one on top.
franzumb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2021, 01:59 PM   #8
baumare
"TRF" Member
 
baumare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
Very suspicious, completely different engraving

Name:  fullsizeoutput_10e1.jpeg
Views: 321
Size:  110.5 KB

Name:  Screen Shot 2021-08-21 at 11.50.21 PM.jpg
Views: 322
Size:  48.8 KB

also the case looks very new on the serial side compare to the reference side
baumare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2021, 04:11 PM   #9
Fredrik
2024 Pledge Member
 
Fredrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,874
Are you sure it's not a 4.7M serial? That would indicate a service replacement case.
Fredrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2021, 06:17 PM   #10
Mark020
"TRF" Member
 
Mark020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,133
Either fake or renumbered IMHO
Mark020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2021, 08:28 PM   #11
alwayshere
"TRF" Member
 
alwayshere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredrik View Post
Are you sure it's not a 4.7M serial? That would indicate a service replacement case.
Replacement cases are in the 4.X millions. This is 47X,XXX. So much earlier.
alwayshere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2021, 11:47 PM   #12
baumare
"TRF" Member
 
baumare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwayshere View Post
Replacement cases are in the 4.X millions. This is 47X,XXX. So much earlier.
For what we know it could be an attempt to a 4.7xx.xxx considering that is not a PCG, no?
baumare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 12:09 AM   #13
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by franzumb View Post
The Case back is stamped III.5X (cant read it). The spacing does not correspond with those seen in HQ. The "5512" is stamped much lower, resembling later models. I also just noticed that the lower crown guard is smaller than the one on top.
Why even consider the watch at this point? Way too many apparent issues. Big pass!
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 12:16 AM   #14
franzumb
"TRF" Member
 
franzumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
Why even consider the watch at this point? Way too many apparent issues. Big pass!
I am considering because it is a very cheap price and it may be a mixture of different parts which might be worth something. The movement etc
franzumb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 01:48 AM   #15
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by franzumb View Post
I am considering because it is a very cheap price and it may be a mixture of different parts which might be worth something. The movement etc
If the price is so cheap, then I guess the seller probably knows that it's a bunch of put-together parts, even though he claimed it was all original.

TBH, it requires a lot of experience to evaluate pieces like this, and to know which parts are legitimate for use or re-sale and which parts are fake and should not be re-sold by an honest seller. Unfortunately, I feel that you may be jumping into the deep end. But good luck to you.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 07:58 AM   #16
Tavli3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jim
Location: miami
Watch: GMT II 16760
Posts: 1,676
According to the HQ Milton link that serial is for a 59 watch which should have a Swiss only dial and not a T Swiss T dial. So it looks like a service dial.
That plus the other concerns equals run Forest run.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tavli3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 08:15 AM   #17
alwayshere
"TRF" Member
 
alwayshere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by baumare View Post
For what we know it could be an attempt to a 4.7xx.xxx considering that is not a PCG, no?
I blame Fredrik for taking us down the wrong path haha

I think you might be getting the digits mixed up here.

Service cases generally are 4,4XX,XXX (and not 4,7XX,XXX anyway)
OP's case is 47X,XXX

So its not trying to be a service case.
alwayshere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 08:22 AM   #18
MrChamfers
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA!!
Watch: ing Warriors ball
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tavli3 View Post
According to the HQ Milton link that serial is for a 59 watch which should have a Swiss only dial and not a T Swiss T dial. So it looks like a service dial.
That plus the other concerns equals run Forest run.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If it is only a couple grand, then why not buy it for the case, movement, dial etc? Well worth it.
MrChamfers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 08:31 AM   #19
franzumb
"TRF" Member
 
franzumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
Thanks for all of the input everyone. Didn't expect that much feedback so quick.
franzumb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 08:57 AM   #20
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: Many
Posts: 3,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrChamfers View Post
If it is only a couple grand, then why not buy it for the case, movement, dial etc? Well worth it.
The case doesn’t make any sense. A case with that serial number should have pointed crown guards. Not to mention the previously-mentioned suspicions re. the engraving (possibly, re-numbered, or fake). And the dial, without the benefit of better pictures to see what’s going on, it may not be legit.
As Swish mentioned earlier, pass.
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 09:46 AM   #21
alwayshere
"TRF" Member
 
alwayshere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
The case doesn’t make any sense. A case with that serial number should have pointed crown guards. Not to mention the previously-mentioned suspicions re. the engraving (possibly, re-numbered, or fake). And the dial, without the benefit of better pictures to see what’s going on, it may not be legit.
As Swish mentioned earlier, pass.
Agree - only the dial (maybe), hands and old bezel insert are worth something just depends on the asking price (and better pics). Then the OP will have to do his own research whether the aforementioned parts are legit or not. Won't have much faith on the seller at this point.
alwayshere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 09:51 AM   #22
baumare
"TRF" Member
 
baumare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwayshere View Post
I blame Fredrik for taking us down the wrong path haha

I think you might be getting the digits mixed up here.

Service cases generally are 4,4XX,XXX (and not 4,7XX,XXX anyway)
OP's case is 47X,XXX

So its not trying to be a service case.
Yes, let's blame him

Yes sure, I know that service cases starts with 4.4XX.XXX, but this is not what I meant, just for discussion let me explain better:

Name:  Screen Shot 2021-08-22 at 7.38.45 PM.jpg
Views: 187
Size:  84.2 KB

Could be an attempt to make it 4.7XX.XXX and not 47X.XXX or there is not enough space?
baumare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 09:53 AM   #23
franzumb
"TRF" Member
 
franzumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwayshere View Post
Agree - only the dial (maybe), hands and old bezel insert are worth something just depends on the asking price (and better pics). Then the OP will have to do his own research whether the aforementioned parts are legit or not. Won't have much faith on the seller at this point.
Here are some better pics.

Engraving in caseback is III.59
Attached Images
     

Last edited by franzumb; 23 August 2021 at 10:00 AM.. Reason: Added another picture
franzumb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 09:55 AM   #24
alwayshere
"TRF" Member
 
alwayshere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by baumare View Post
Yes, let's blame him

Yes sure, I know that service cases starts with 4.4XX.XXX, but this is not what I meant, just for discussion let me explain better:

Attachment 1240079

Could be 4.7XX.XXX and not 47X.XXX or there is not enough space?
I understood what you are asking but the OP specifically stated it was 47X,XXX (assume he was told this or he has seen it in the flesh). Also the service case 4 digit engraving doesn't look like this.

alwayshere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 09:57 AM   #25
alwayshere
"TRF" Member
 
alwayshere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by franzumb View Post
Here are some better pics
you'll have to do your own research now.

There is a good site that covers the 5512/5513 dial variations if you google it.

Good luck.
alwayshere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2021, 10:09 AM   #26
franzumb
"TRF" Member
 
franzumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 124270
Posts: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwayshere View Post
you'll have to do your own research now.

There is a good site that covers the 5512/5513 dial variations if you google it.

Good luck.
Yup, from what I gather it is most likely a matte MF dial. Nothing jumps at me as fake initially.

Thanks.
franzumb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2021, 04:47 AM   #27
Fredrik
2024 Pledge Member
 
Fredrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwayshere View Post
I blame Fredrik for taking us down the wrong path haha

I think you might be getting the digits mixed up here.

Service cases generally are 4,4XX,XXX (and not 4,7XX,XXX anyway)
OP's case is 47X,XXX

So its not trying to be a service case.
Oh, crap, sorry about that. I had a vague recollection of service cases having _both_ 4.4M and 4.7M serials and just wanted to be sure that the seller didn't misread it for being six digits when it could have been seven digits...

The font on late service cases is definitely different, but early service cases could have a 70s font. Anyway, looking closer at the pictures it is probably six digits.
Fredrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2021, 05:49 AM   #28
1675-David
"TRF" Member
 
1675-David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,061
this is not a service case, it's a fake case. Dial is unattractive but looks OK from these images.
1675-David is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.